cases Flashcards

1
Q

(intro) what does the case of Evans say?

A

judicial review is concerned with decision-making processes unlike appeal which is concerned with the correctness of a decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does the CCSU case say?

A

lord Diplock identified 3 grounds of judicial review; illegality, unreasonableness and procedural impropriety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

(policy) what does the case of Pub Charity say?

A

adopting a fixed rule of policy must promote the statutory purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

(illegality - policy) why did the case fail in Findlay?

A

minister had to have regard to public interest (prisoners)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what ground is abdicating a statutory discretionary power under?

A

illegality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what ground is abuse of discretionary power under?

A

illegality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(purpose) what does the case of Padfield say?

A

discretions always controlled by statutory purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

municipal council of sydney is under what ground?

A

improper purpose - abuse of discretionary power - illegality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(purpose) what did the case of Ireland say?

A

ulterior purposes permitted if they do not frustrate the policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

adopted policy did not promote statutory purpose in what case?

A

pub charity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what does the case of Greyhound say in regard to right to legal rep?

A

there is a general right of legal rep if livelihood or reputation at stake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does ex parte Tarrant say in regard to right to legal rep?

A

5 matters decision-makers should have regard to when determining whether or not someone should have legal representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the case on disclosure of relevant material?

A

daganayasi - relevant material must be disclosed so the other party is given opportunity to correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what does the case of Awatare say in regard to reasons for adverse decisions?

A

there is no general duty to give reasons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

“the giving of reasons is one of the fundamentals of good administration” is from what case?

A

Breen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lewis v Wilson and Hortons said?

A

3 reasons why judges should give reasons =
1. uphold justice
2. protect against judges giving wrong decisions
3. need to retain basis in which to test lawfulness of decision.

17
Q

what did the case of Jones say in regard to reasons?

A

reasons must be given if personal liberty or basic rights are at stake

18
Q

what case says the duty to give reasons is flexible?

A

Baker

19
Q

what is the rule on prior notice?

A

must be a good notice of hearing

20
Q

what is a case on prior notice?

A

D v M

21
Q

what does the case of Osborn say in regard to a right to a hearing?

A

may not dispense with an oral hearing simply to save time