Cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Yes Spending

A

Dole
- 19 yr old can buy beer
- Congress pass act to withhold federal money for highways for states not in compliance with 21st Am.
- Gives us limitations
> pursuit of general welfare
> condition must be unambiguous and transparent
> must be related to federal interest of law
> other constitutional provisions may bar the condition as well
> cannot be too coercive

  • also a question of 10th Am.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

No Spending

A

Sebelius

  • Medicaid expansion provision
  • Receipt of federal Medicaid based on states expanding their eligibility reqs
  • No choice for states because risk losing all Medicaid funding (10-50% total)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Executive and Separation of Powers

A

Chadha

  • INA - Deferred Deportation
  • Writes a one-house legislative veto into the act
  • Congress has Article I - Naturalization
  • Double dip by pass act, now try to veto
  • Violation of Exec Power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Executive Power in general

A

Chadha
+
Youngstown
- time of war, emergency (court says pre-war tho)
- domestic labor issue - steel mill strikes
- seizing private property
- says in Taft-Hartley, will not give pres power to seize production during labor dispute (questionable color light)
- Tripartite (Jackson concurr)
* Highest Ebb (own power, del power, deference by court)
* Twilight (if silent, Court will look to see if Congress gave green light where Pres and Leg have concurrent authority)
* Lowest Ebb (Pres can still act if enumerated power but rare)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Exec Authority re Major Foreign Policy Dispute

A

Dames and Moore

  • Iran hostage crisis
  • P has economic interest in Iran
  • Congress agrees
  • Do not need ratification for an Executive Agreement with another country
  • This executive power is all good
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Exec Authority re Stopping Sales to foreign country

A

Curtiss-Wright

  • Congress passed reso authorizing pres to stop sale of arms to Chaco border dispute
  • Pres issued EO doing same
  • P sold munitions and penalized
  • Sole Organ of foreign affairs***
  • Exec is clear here
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Exec Authority and Travel

A

Trump v. Hawaii

  • Limit entry from counties because not meeting security standards
  • Not all countries Muslim, and no mention of Muslim
  • Applies Rational Basis Review thru a national security lens
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Exec Authority and Legislating

A

Clinton v. NY

  • Line item veto
  • Veto changes law adopted by Congress
  • Not how presentment should work
  • Pres has some lawmaking, but not all
  • This action is no good
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Exec Authority and Foreign Recognition

A

Zivotofsky

  • Exec refusing to put Jerusalem, Israel
  • Reception Clause “shall receive Ambassadors and other public ministers”
  • Treaties - both express and implied
  • Lowest ebb but still okay
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Constitutional Standing Broad C

A

Allen

Lujan - ICR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Injury Cases

A

Yes - Duke Power

  • Nuclear reactors
  • Injury is clear because building a nuclear reactor can lead to exposure, pollution, accident

No - City of LA v. Lyons

  • Illegal chokehold case
  • No injury b/c it is not likely to suffer from same future injury in the future
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Causation Cases

A

Yes - Duke Power
- But for the law, the reactor would not be built and Ps would not suffer harms

No - Allen v. Wright

  • Class action against RS for funding segregated schools
  • No evidence that if IRS withheld tax-exempt status that the segregation would change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Redressability Cases

A

Duke Power
- If law struck down, reactors will go away

No - Linda v. Richard

  • TX child support case
  • If win, dad will go to jail and she would not get child support money

No - Warth v. Seldin

  • Challenge to zoning practices
  • P did not demonstrate exclusionary housing would be constructed without zoning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Third Party Standing

A

Yes - Singleton v. Wulff

  • Doctors challenge statute that affects the funding of Medicaid to needy persons needing abortions
  • 2 factors
  • relationship of litigation to person whose right litigant seeks to assert
  • ability of 3rd party to assert own right

No - Gilmore v. Utah

  • Mom asking for stay of execution even though he waived his own right to appeal
  • Close relationship, but son knew his right and waived it. So no.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

General Grievance

A

No case - US v. Richardson

  • Taxpayer challenged Congress failure to get more detailed reports of CIA expenditures
  • No logical nexus b/w taxpayer and injury . No general grievance.

Yes case - Flast v. Cohen

  • Taxpayers can bring general grievance if
  • must be a spending clause power
  • must be an establishment clause
  • EC dont have personal injury - so case can be brought
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ripeness Cases

A

Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner = Ripe. Pure legal question, which meets the first factor. Costly to pay for rebranding. Can risk severe civil and criminal penalties from statutory noncompliance. More direct injury to company vs. doctors from Poe.

Poe v. Ullman = Not ripe. Prohibiting physicians from giving out contraceptive advice to patients. Seeking an injunction before you can be prosecuted. There is no immediate or certain threat of prosecution. No case or controversy.

17
Q

Mootness Cases

A

Moore v. Ogilvie = Not moot. Illinois law required that a petition to nominate candidates for the general election for a new political party be signed by at least 35k voters, including 200 qualified voters from each of at least 50 counties…plaintiffs immediately filed suit, but election was over by the time the supreme court heard the case. Future elections, an important issue.

Roe v. Wade = Not moot. If that termination makes a case moot, pregnancy litigation seldom will survive much beyond the trial stage, and appellate review will be effectively denied.

Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Service = Moot. Laidlaw was violating mercury discharge limits.
A defendant claiming that its voluntary compliance moots a case bears the formidable burden of showing that it is absolutely clear the allegedly wrongful behavior could not reasonably be expected to recur
3 exceptions to mootness doctrine (did NOT create exceptions, LAID OUT exceptions)
Wrongs capable of repetition, but evading review (abortion)
Class actions
Voluntary cessation of unlawful conduct (defendant is doing something)

18
Q

Anti-Commandeering Cases General

A

McCulloch - US Bank
NY
Printz
Reno

19
Q

Executive Anti-C Case

A

Printz
- Federal background check case. Congress cannot compel state officials to do the job of the executive branch. Congress cannot transfer the responsibility of executing the law to local authorities since the Constitution clearly states this is the responsibility of the President.

20
Q

Legislative Anti-C Cases

A

Reno v. Condon

  • DPPA to regulate disclosure of personal info retained by DMBs
  • Congress seeking to regulate state activity, NOT states’ regulations of private actors , or actions of state officials

NY v. US

  • Toxic waste disposal
  • 2 options (take title of it, or legislate to regulate)
  • political accountability falling on states
  • no real choice but to legislate, and Congrss cannot force that

Murphy v. NCAA

  • Sports gambling
  • Congress cannot force states to not do something, if not going to regulate