Case Study Flashcards
Whats is the Address?
78-80 Perry Hill, Catford, London SE6 4EY
Who is the client?
City Mist Ltd
Who is the Landlord?
Kimberland Ltd
When were you initially instructed?
8th July 2019
When did you initially initiate an open marketing campaign?
29th July 2019
When did the first set of HOT’s get complete?
12th November 2019
Why did the first tenant pull out of the deal?
Covid-19 Uncertainty
When did you re-market the property?
13th July 2020
What were the client’s objectives?
- Retain public house use
- Grant between a 10-15 year term
- Contract the lease outside of the LTA 1954
When was the closing date for bids?
6th September 2020
HOT’s agreed for a second time??
26th October 2020
Simultaneous exchange of contract and Lease completed on what date?
25th November 2020
Handover of the property to the new tenant?
30th November 2020
What was the total site area?
1,496 sq m or 16,107 sq ft
What was the building footprint?
308 sq m or 3,319 sq ft
What was the turnover in the preceding year? Was this for the entire property?
£275,000, no just the public house
Did you have rental information for the flats above?
No, they were not managed effectively
Why was the property trading below what the REO would?
There was no kitchen equipment and the property needed substantial decoration.
What was your opinion of Fair Maintainable Turnover?
£375,000
How did you reach your opinion of FMT?
I had regard to the trading accounts and they looked lower than the levels seen in the comparable evidence. I made an adjustment to reflect this.
What was the Wet Trade?
£300,000 80% of FMT
What was the Dry Trade?
£75,000 20% of FMT
What was the Gross Profit?
£247,500 66% of FMT
What were the Wages?
£100,000 26.67% of FMT
How much were the other costs?
£67,500 18% of FMT
How much was the tenant’s capital?
£100,000 x 10% = £10,000 of 2.67%
What were the total operating costs?
£177,500 47.34% of FMT, not 59.17% as stated in my sub. I am afraid this was a typo and reflects the operating costs as a percentage of the wet trade.
What was the Fair Maintainable Operating Profit?
£70,000 18.67% of FMT
Rental Bid at 50%?
£35,000 9.33% of FMT
What is included in the other costs?
Cleaning, electricity, glassware, sundry, gas, water
What does the tenant’s capital reflect?
The £100,000 is for stock, fixtures & fittings, and initial redecoration. This figure was estimated from looking at other comparable lettings and the 10% rate of return is high to reflect this risk of this type of operation.
How did you check crosscheck the rent?
By seeing if the rental bid on FMT was similar to the comparable evidence I gathered. The comparable evidence range of rental bid on turnover was from 8.13% to 9.60%. My profits method was within the parameters defined here and I proceeded.
What was the landlord willing to grant to the upper parts? And how is it described?
An ‘Assured shorthold tenancy agreement’ (AST) allows a landlord to let out a property to a tenant while retaining the right to repossess the property at the end of the term of the tenancy. However, the landlord will need to give the tenant at least two months’ notice of any reoccupation.
What estate agency did you speak to?
KFH and Acorn
What did you and the estate agents conclude about the upper parts?
Their most likely use would be as shared living accommodation, to be let as separate rooms as opposed to as a whole.
Name the streets your residential comparables were on?
Nylon Grove £400
Cumberland Place £400
Datchet Road £450 not shared accommodation and slightly higher specification
Clarens Street £400
What rate did you apply to the residential upper parts before the adjustment?
£400 pcm or £4,800 pa
What discount did you apply to the resi upper parts?
30%