Case Study 1 Flashcards
Target Date Retirement Fund - overview (7)
- Member selects fund that aligns with their retirement date
- first invests in riskier assets and then less volatile as approach retirement
- fund is actively managed (unlike lifestyle) so can account for market movements
- driven by target year and not by members age
- can switch fund if change retirement date
- Vidas likely in growth phase wherein target investment growth that covers inflation + 3% net of charges, has long term volatility of 10-12% and aims for steady real growth through diversification.
- moves into consolidation phase 10 years prior to retirement
First time buyers (6)
- 0% stamp duty payable on purchases under £300k
- 5% if between £300k-500k
- should not exceed this otherwise will be taxed at normal rates
- their parents lending money for the deposit does not effect first time buyer relief
- can use LISA towards property if not over £450k - may want to consider this otherwise government bonus lost
- may be eligible for help to buy equity loan if purchasing new build (no charges due in first 5 years)
JISA - Advantages (6)
- Tax efficient and gives potential for investment growth - £100 rule does not apply to income produced from JISAs
- Does not use their allowances
- Range of available funds they can invest in
- £9k per annum likely to be sufficient for further education costs
- Can contribute lump sum or via regular contributions
- anyone can contribute
JISA - Disadvantages 6
- Children can choose funds from age 16
- No access to funds until child becomes 18
- Is child’s product and they may not use it for education when turning 18 (lack of control for parent)
- investment risk or inflation risk if invested in cash
- charges applicable may be high
- may require advice for investment and most appropriate provider etc
Benefits of using a financial adviser (18)
- Help the client to identify financial problems and goals
- Identify financial strategies by showing and discussing options available
- Setting priorities in line with clients aims and objectives
- Researching the market for the best products
- Executing the planning as client may not have the time or knowledge to do themselves
- Wealth creation and preservation
- Helps clients to avoid common financial mistakes
- Adviser expertise and regulated advice
- Less admin for client
- they have an adventurous ATR therefore will be able to suggest higher risk investments
- charges review
- financial planning tools available to adviser
- likely to result in improved returns
- ongoing monitoring of investments
- diversification can be achieved
- Review the market for new products
- keep up with changes in taxation and legislation
Multi-Asset funds (4)
- funds that invest across all asset classes including cash, fixed interest securities ad equities producing diversification
- can also be fund of funds
- tailored to specific risk profiles, here, 40-85% equities would be most suitable for Vatil’s ATR
- also include 0-35%, 20-60% and flexible (up to manager)
Benefits of Family-Income Benefit (10)
- Tax free income paid out
- sum assured is not limited
- term can be set to match needs
- low cost cover
- can get guarantee premiums
- can be set up under trust
- indexation is available
- meets objectives
- simple underwriting as both in good health
- cannot be cancelled by insurer
LISA - Drawbacks (9)
- max contribution of £4K
- early access leads to penalties
- penalty on withdrawal exceeds government bonus
- can only use for mortgage or retirement purposes
- investment risk or inflation risk
- may have high charges
- need for financial advice
- limited choice of providers
- add admin as may need to set up another S&S or Cash ISA to fulfil allowance
What are advantages of making regular contributions into S&S JISA rather than cash JISA (7)
- no prospect for investment growth
- Juna young so long timescale for growth
- pound cost averaging
- benefit from investment volatility
- can stop and start contributions when they want
- assists with budgeting
- reduces risk of poor investment timing
What are the risks of relying on death in service benefits for family protection (5)
- may lose cover if change/leave employment
- employer can change terms
- benefit level may not be right for requirements
- as based on income, if part-time, level of cover decreases
- only covers death and not long term or serious illness
Recommend and justify suitable policies to provide protection in the event of long-term illness or disability (16)
- IP policies for both as this pays out tax-free regular income on the event of long term illness or disability
- these should be taken out as single life policies in order to maximise benefits and deferral periods will be different
- the sum assured will be 50-60% of their earnings
- the deferral period should be 6 weeks for Vidas as he receives SSP during this period, and 13 weeks for Viktoria for the same reason
- the term should be to their selected retirement ages
- indexation should be included to ensure benefits keep up with inflation
- the policies should be taken out on an own occupation basis as this increases the chance of a pay out
- guaranteed premiums should be selected in order to maintain certainty of costs throughout the term
Recommend and justify suitable policies to protect the family in the event of the death of Vidas or Vik (12)
- both should take out level term polices as they provide a tax-free lump sum on their deaths
- these should be in the form of two single life policies, as the amounts needed on death may differ
- the sum assured should at a minimum cover any impending mortgage, and be sufficient enough to provide for the survivor and family
- the term should be until their retirement age, to ensure they are covered up to this point
- the policies should be put into discretionary trusts as this will avoid probate and keep the proceeds outside of their estate
- waiver of premium should be included so they are able to maintain cover in the event that they cannot pay their premium
Recommend and justify suitable protection policies in the event of serious illness (16)
- they should take out level term standalone CIC for each of them as this will maximise benefits for little difference in cost and pays out a tax free lump sum on the diagnosis of a critical illness
- single life policies should be taken out as amount needed may differ
- the sum assured should be sufficient enough to maintain the families current lifestyle and pay off impending mortgage
- the term of the policy should be to their nominated retirement ages
- they should select premiums to be guaranteed as this allows for certainty of costs throughout the policy term
- waiver of premium should be included to maintain cover in the event that they are unable to pay premium
- should meet ABI best practice guidelines for CIC as this is the best level of protection available
- CIC policies may include child cover and will pay out if their children are diagnosed with a CI
State the factors an adviser should consider when identifying a suitable sum assured for life cover and/or CIC (6)
- debts
- expenditure
- cost of adapting home for CIC
- childcare costs
- availability of state benefits
- income
Assuming they are not yet married and have not drawn valid wills they will; (4)
- die intestate
- only inherit jointly held assets
- they are unmarried
- single owned assets will pass to child