Case Studies Flashcards
Newcastle-upon-Tyne (urbanisation in an MEDC)
It was developed as a major port during industrial revolution (urbanisation).
This caused the richer people to move out (suburbanisation).
When industry declined, companies closed and jobs were lost (counterurbanisation).
Then Tyne and Wear development corporation (TWDC) focussed on businesses, spending £140m on offices - can be criticised (reurbanisation).
Surbiton (suburbanisation)
A suburb of SW London which has recently increased in population.
Pull factors: Has good transport links (Waterloo in 18 minutes), housing, restaurants, school and parks.
Issues: 70% have a car (blocked roads), tube zone 6 so prices high and many use cars, high house prices (economic segregation).
Solutions: trying to reclassify to zone 5, widening roads, limiting delivery bay times to provide parking, surbiton neighbourhood committee.
St Ives (Counterurbanisation)
In Cambridgeshire (70 miles north of London). Huge population increase (3800 in 1960 to 16,400 in 2010).
Due to: good links by car and rail to Ldn and Cambridge (1/4 of people commute to Ldn)
Issues: congestion on A14, house price rise, flood risk, families increased so more pressure on schools.
Solutions: 200 new homes (75 being affordable), 240 new places at schools, embankments and planned busway.
Notting hill (gentrification)
Historically: poor and Afro-Caribbean background with some racial conflict (teddy boys and race riots).
Change: rich slowly gentrified area, now has high end shops, restaurants, cafes (Lazy Daisy Cafe), celebrities, and portobello road.
Heritage: still keeps some of its roots with Caribbean style carnival on August bank holiday (biggest outside of Rio De Janeiro).
City challenge partnerships (National reurbanisation/regeneration scheme)
Partnerships of councils with businesses and communities.
31 of them set up between 1991 and 1998.
Government contributed £1.14 Billion.
Schemes attracted £7.58 Billion in investment.
Hulme, Manchester (partnership scheme)
Hume city challenge partnership was founded in 1992.
Issues: poor quality housing (tower blocks) and poor health. This caused outward movement leaving empty flats, unemployment and crime.
Solution: Manchester City Council worked with private businesses to create £37.5 million package to redevelop. They aimed for community feel and good transport links.
Actions: Tower blocks demolished and council and private housing made. Thee main shopping area was refurbished. they created the Zion centre which holds community arts projects. Created a new business Park at Birley fields.
Successes: The population grew by 3.3%. There was £400 million worth of private investment (but mostly still council housing). Unemployment fell from 32% to 6% (but still high comparatively)
London Thames Gateway Development Corporation (property-led regeneration)
LTGDC set a 10 year program from 2004.
Aims: reduce derelict land, encourage existing and new development, create an attractive environment, improve social facilities.
Actions: by April 2011 they had invested £209.6 million. Put new town centres in Canning Town and custom house. Improved pedestrian and train access. New university campuses built. Sustainable housing development.
Successes: population rose by 12%. Underperforming schools improved upon renovation.
Criticisms: accused of not listening to the public opinion and use of towerblocks (i.e. Virginia Quay)
Detroit (Urban decline)
Suffered industrial decay (Ford, GM, Chrysler) and corrupt government spending. Leading to houses being abandoned, businesses closing, job loss.
Characteristics: murder at a 40 year high, police response very slow (58 minutes average), lack of basic services, 80,000 buildings abandoned, $20 billion in debt.
Possible solution: sell art collection, property led regeneration or partnership schemes.
Old Trafford Centre (decentralisation of retail)
Opened 1998, built on brownfield site, 5 miles from Manchester.
Characteristics: 150 acres, cost £600 million, 8% of uk pop within 45 minute drive, range of activities (20 screen cinema, 1600 seat food court), 11,500 free parking spaces, bus station with 160 bus an hour capacity.
Impacts: congestion, decline of nearby towns, decline of Manchester (but arguably allowed it to become more business focussed), donate to charities, 8000 jobs provided with benefits (childcare).
Mumbai (Landfill to electricity)
In 2008 a landfill site was covered to trap methane and this is used to generate electricity.
Dahravi, Mumbai (landfill incomes)
Huge landfill sites in Dahravi support the incomes of many of the poor and without it there would be further poverty.
China (waste management)
Lots of recycling is sent to China for processing (increases CO2 but still lower than alternatives) due to cheap labour and need for materials to produce new products.
Sheffield (Energy Recovery)
An energy recovery facility in Sheffield burns rubbish to heat 140 buildings.
Curitiba, Brazil (Integrated transport)
City has 1600 busses.
70% of commuters use busses.
Is fast, efficient and successful.
Christchurch (road schemes of sustainable transport)
Have HOV (high occupancy vehicle) lanes.
Taliban, Afghanistan (causes of conflict)
Their conflict is due to ideology and belief systems. This is an extreme example.
Orange Revolution, Kiev (non-violent protest)
2005 was a corrupt election.
Non-violent protests began.
The world was watching and successfully got a re-election.
Yushchenco won this time and so non-violence worked.
Burmese Monks (non-violent protest)
In 2007, Burmese monks were unsuccessful in non-violence as they were met by violent Burmese armed forces. (An example of how non-violent expression of conflict can evolve into violence).
Norway (conflict resolution)
Norway mediated for Sri Lanka in their civil war.
International Alert (conflict resolution)
An example of an NGO mediating (mediated in Liberia).
Israel Palestine (Geographical impact of conflict)
Can be argued that the conflict has not only had a geographical impact, but that the geography had an impact on the conflict (as a lot of it is based around key sites and water).
Israel is supported by the USA. Different countries recognise different states.
Current divisions come from 1993 peace talks (roughly).
In West Bank and Gaza, Hamas (violent) are in charge, they do not recognise Israel and Israeli government doesn’t recognise them.
Conflict caused by the issue of control of Jerusalem (key place of worship for all). Jews believe this land was promised to them in the second testament. There are very limited water resources and these are currently controlled by Israel. The West Bank Barrier causes much frustration. Palestinians are refugees and live in terrible conditions.
Social impacts are fucking huge. Millions of deaths of military and civilians, 4 million refugees, human rights concerns, cultural losses on both sides, unexploded bombs.
Environmental impacts: damaged land, loss of agricultural land and desertification, contamination from bombing of water plants, Mediterranean sea pollution from Gaza waste.
Economic impacts: many trillions, less money able to be spent on development, huge poverty and almost 50% unemployment, rely on international aid.
Third party intervention ~ the UN (in Israel Palestine)
UN can be seen to actually be blamed for conflict as they ignored the 85% Arab population in the beginning in rehousing Jews after WW2. They have tried lots of things and many ways but none have been really successful. Most recent is the “roadmap for peace” which was backed by US, EU and RUS. The final text of it was released in 2003. Plan fell into the background when Bush ended term in 2009 but made no significant impact from 2003-2009. They are bias towards Israel.
They could have focussed more upon development and aid then security may follow. UN probably best at less extreme situations and have had other failures i.e. Spreading Cholera in Haiti, rape in the Congo etc.
Some successes like slowing nuclear bomb research, protecting Galápagos Islands.
Wales (consequences of separatism)
Protect their culture through education i.e. Teaching the Welsh language in schools and having it on signs.