Case Studies Flashcards
INTENT Case Law
R v TAISALIKA
The nature of the blow and the gash which it produced point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent.
Case Law for Recklessness
Cameron v R
Recklessness is established if:
(a) the defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that:
(1a) his or her actions would bring about the prescribed result & OR
(1b) that the prescribed circumstances existed &
(b) having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable.
Reckless Case Law
R v Tipple
Recklessness requires that the offender knew of or have a conscious appreciation of the relevant risk, and it may be said that it requires “ deliberate decision to run the risk”
Case Law for Wounding
R v WATERS
A wound is a “breaking of the skin evidenced by flow of blood. Maybe internal or external.
Tip: Gash is also Wounding
Think wound is breaking the skin and blood flowing like Waters
Case Law for Intent
R v Collister
Two officers
Tip: Call list ER room
Intent