Case Names Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Fundamental right to marry - back child support

A

Zablocki v. Redhail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fundamental right to custody of child (not here)

A

Michael H. v. Gerald D.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

First case to recognize fundamental right to marry

A

Loving v. Virginia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Right to privacy includes right to abortion

A

Roe v. Wade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Current abortion standard

A

Planned parenthood v. Casey (undue burden test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Separate but equal is not equal under the equal protection clause

A

Brown v. Board of Education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Test for discriminatory purpose

A

Village of Arlington Heights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Old standard for gender classification - strict scrutiny

A

Frontiero v. Richardson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Gender classifications receive intermediate scrutiny - Gov. can show important purpose through an exceedingly persuasive justification.

A

VMI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Affirmative Action

A

Fisher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Content-based restrictions must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling government interest.

A

Reed v. Town of Gilbert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Distinction between vagueness and over-breadth

A

Jews for Jesus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Example for when prior restraint is allowed

A

New York Times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Test for incitement of illegal activity

A

Brandenburg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

two situations for fighting words (unprotected speech)

A

Chaplinsky

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

states may not regulate categories of unprotected speech, such as “fighting words,” on the basis of content

A

RAV

17
Q

Test for obscene speech

A

Miller

18
Q

Indecent speech (less protected speech)

A

Cohen v. California

19
Q

Flag burning case- Application of O’Brien test

A

Texas v. Johnson

20
Q

Corporate spending is symbolic speech

A

Citizens United

21
Q

Test for symbolic speech

A

O’Brien

22
Q

Content-neutral rule

A

Ward v. Rock Against Racism

23
Q

A state may curtail a person’s freedom of speech directed at unwilling listeners as a proper content-neutral, reasonable time, place, and manner restriction.

A

Hill v. Colorado

24
Q

Substantial disturbance (school forum test)

A

Tinker

25
Q

Bong hits for Jesus

A

Frederick

26
Q

Off campus speech test

A

Mahanoy

27
Q

the government must protect the rights of those who object to same-sex relationships on religious or philosophical grounds.

A

Masterpiece Cake Shop

28
Q

Test for Establishment Clause

A

Lemon

29
Q

School prayers are impermissible

A

Santa Fe Indpt. School Dist.

30
Q

Free exercise test

A

Smith

31
Q

Right to privacy - marriage is within the zone of privacy

A

Griswold v. Conn.

32
Q

Test for entanglement

A

Lugar

33
Q

Entwinement case

A

Brentwood academy

34
Q

Public function standard

A

Jackson v. Met. Ed.

35
Q

Content-based TPM restriction

A

Boos v. Berry

36
Q

Secondary effects of speech

A

City of Renton v. Playtime Theater

37
Q

Example of race-based classification

A

Korematsu v. United States