Case Management Flashcards
Court’s general management powers
The court has a number of powers to mange cases and costs.
Examples:
- extend/shorten the time for compliance with any rule, pd or court order
- adjourn hearings or bring them forward
- require party or legal rep to attend court
- stay the whole or part of the proceedings or judgment either generally or until a specified event
- order any party to file and serve a costs budget
Court’s power to make orders of its own initiative
Without either party taking a step the court could provide new directions or terminate a case.
Court makes an order of its own initiative without a hearing or without giving the parties the opportunity to make representations.
Court will include a statement in the order the parties have the right to apply to set aside, stay or vary the order within a given period.
If the court does not specify a period, any application should be made within 7 days of the date on which the order was served on the party making the application.
What is a strike out
Strike out is the deletion of written material from a statement of case so that it cannot be relief on in the proceedings by any party.
It can include deletion of the entire statement of case so that the case is effectively over.
Strike out is designed to target cases that are inadequately drafted or are otherwise an abuse of court process.
Court’s power to strike out
The court can exercise its power to strike out the whole or part of a statement of case of its own initiative, this is likely to happen around the allocation/case management stage when the court first engages with the substance of the dispute.
Used sparingly by the courts as there are often more suitable ways to deal with defective cases - requiring amendments or if the ground is failure to comply with previous orders made by the court - imposing a sanction such as an adverse costs order.
Difference between strike out and summary judgment
Considerable overlap between the two provisions and applications are often made for summary judgment and strike out in the alternative.
Strike out focuses on the statements of case and so covers cases which do not amount to a legally recognisable claim or defence.
Case or issues are weak as pleaded. Summary judgement covers cases which are weak on the facts.
Difference between strike out and default judgment
Default judgment is the consequence of the defendant failing to respond to a claim.
Default judgment is therefore procedural: if a defendant fails to file and acknowledgement of service and/or a defence in accordance with the CPR time limits, the claimant can apply for default judgment.
Court does not consider the merits of the case when ordering judgment in default. Strike out is not purely procedural.
Grounds for a strike out
a) The statement of case discloses no reasonable ground for bringing or defending the claim
- no claim or defence as a matter of law
b) The statement of case is an abuse of the court’s process or otherwise likely to obstruct the just disposal of proceedings
- misuse of procedure
- obstructing just disposal: includes claims that are vexatious or obviously ill-founded
c) There has been a failure to comply with a rule, practice direction or court order
- failure in the way the claim has been conducted
- more likely to impose a lesser sanction for non-compliance
Judgment after strike out
If a statement of case is struck out the other party can generally obtain judgment with costs by filing a simple request at court.
Examples of sanctions
Interest: reducing the interest payable to the claimant as a sanction imposed on the claimant
Costs: ordering the defendant to pay costs on the indemnity rather than standard basis as a sanction imposed on the defendant
Striking out a statement of case
Court’s power to impose sanctions
Court can either:
- impose a sanction immediately
- make an unless order - an order which provides for an automatic sanction in the event of non-compliance with the order. Unless order must specify the date and time within which the act must be done
Failure to disclose expert report
Automatic sanction which prevents party from using it at trial
Failure to file a costs budget
Treated as only filing a costs budget of applicable court fees.
Sanctions and time limits
Where a rule, PD or court order
- requires a party to do something within a specified time and
- specified the consequences for failure to comply
the time for doing the act may not be extended by agreement between parties except for prior written agreement for maximum 28 days (so long as done not put hearing date at risk)
- unless court orders otherwise
Non-compliance with orders imposing sanctions
If a party fails to comply with a rule, PD or order imposing sanction, the sanction takes effect unless the party applies for and obtains relief from that sanction
Relief from sanctions
CPR 3.9: court must consider the need:
- for litigation to be conducted efficiently and at proportionate cost
- to enforce compliance with rules, practice directions and orders
Denton test:
1. Breach is neither serious nor significant
- If not, Why breach occurred
- All circumstances of the case - in particular cpr 3.9
Purpose of allocation
Deciding which track a claim should be allocated to.
Matter because the court manages the claims on different tracks in different ways.
Decision is based primarily on the value of the claim. When assessing value the court will disregard interest, costs, any amount not in dispute and any contributory negligence.
Four allocation tracks
- small claims track
- fast track
- intermediate track
- multi-track
Small claims track
Normal cases:
Value not more than £10,000.
Personal injury:
Not more than £10,000 and
- personal injuries damages are not more than £1,500
- personal injuries for road traffic claims are not more than £5,000