Case Law - Free Movement of Establishment Flashcards
Daily Mail
- DM wanted to transfer central management and control from UK to NL for tax purposes.
- UK law prohibits companies from ceasing to be resident without prior consent
- Does EU Treaty preclude a MS from prohibiting a company to move its central management and. control without prior consent
- Treaty ensures that companies don’t get hindered from: setting up of agencies, branches or subsidiaries. (52)
- DM wants to set up investment management office, which is the described above)
- UK law doesn’t restrict such a transaction. It only requires consent if DM wants to transfer its central management and decision making while maintaining its legal personality and status in UK.
- Companies are creatures of national law.
- Legislation varies widely regarding the factor providing connection to the national territory required for the incorporation of a company and the question weather a company may modify that factor.
- DM can transfer, if necessary, after winding-up and settling its tax position in the UK and establish in a new MS.
Centros
- Danish authorities refused to register the branch, claiming that Centros tries to avoid stricter rules on min. capital
- can authorities block a company from setting up a branch if it is trying to benefit from more lenient rules?
- If MS prevents company from registering a branch, it goes against EU-Treaty (Freedom of Establishment)
- Choosing a country with more lenient rules is not an abuse
- No proof of fraud, if company doesn’t conduct business in MS with registered office
Cartesio
- establised in Hungary, wants to move its seat to Italy, while being governed by Hungarian law.
- Hungarian law requires a winding-up of company and reincorporation in new MS
- Can Hungary restrict Cartesio from moving seat by requiring a winding-up?
- freedom of establishment enables company to move seat to different country by converting itself to new company or open branches
- EU Treaty confers no right to move seat into MS while maintaining legal status in original MS
- A MS has power to define connecting factor and how that is maintained
National Grid
- dutch national Grid Indus has claim against country in MS and wants to move place of effective management to UK, to avoid high exchange rate cost.
- the company moved the place of effective management but did not want to change the applicable law
- can NL tax the unrealized capital gains at the point of transfer?
- legislation to ensure right allocation of powers is appropriate
- Art 49 does not preclude legislation that fixes profits taxable at the time of transfer.
- only amount of tax is determined, not collected
Überseering
Ü bought land in D and got defective work done
- tried to get compensation via the German court
- German court dismisses, claiming that Ü has to reincorporate in Germany, since all stock is now German owned
- Can Germany dismiss Ü’s sue?
- requiring reincorporation goes against freedom of establishment
- denying legal rights to a properly registered company in another MS is not justifiable
- requirement like protection of the interests of creditors, minority shareholders, employees and even the taxation authorities may justify freedom of establishment, but can not justify denying legal capacity
Inspire Art
- NL wants to add conditions (min. capital, …)
- Can NL demand higher conditions, effectively forcing companies to comply with national law?
- this obstructs freedom of establishment
impediment of freedom can not be justified by Art 52 (protecting creditors, ensuring fairness and tax inspection efficiency)
Vale
- Vale wants to move seat to Hungary and discontinue operations in Italy
- Can Hungarian court reject the application of registration?
- Arts 49, 54 do not prevent Member states from requiring a cross border conversion to comply with national law
- national legislation shall not treat domestic / foreign conversion differently
. Principles to apply are Equivalence and Effectiveness (authorities must accept documents of host member state)