case law - firearms offences

Question 1

R v Pekepo

Answer 1

A reckless discharge of a firearm in the general direction of a passer by who happens to be hit is not sufficient proof. An intention to shoot that person must be established.

Question 2

R v Kelt

Answer 2

Having a firearm “with him” requires a very close physical link and a degree of immediate control over the weapon by the man alleged to have the firearm with him