Case Law Flashcards

1
Q

R v Harney

A

Recklessness involves “foresight of dangerous consequences that could well happen, together with an intention to continue the course of conduct regardless of the risk”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Archer

A

Property may be damaged if it suffers
*permanent or temporary physical harm or
*permanent or temporary impairment
of its use or value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Mohan

A

Intent involves “a decision to bring about, in so far as it lies within the accused’ power, the commission of the offence”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Waaka

A

A “fleeting or passing thought” is not sufficient; there must be a “firm intent or a firm purpose to effect an act”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Wilson

A

It is well established a tenancy is an interest in land… Where, as here, the Crown alleges that damage by fire has been caused recklessly and the person charged is a tenant of the property (or holds another qualifying interest) then, in the absence of any aggravating features, that person cannot be convicted of arson.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Harpur

A

The Court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops… the defendant’s conduct may be considered in its entirety. Considering how much remains to be done… is always relevant, though not determinative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Hallam

A

On a charge of knowingly having possession of an explosive substance, it must be proved that the offender knowingly had the substance in his possession and also that he knew it to be an explosive substance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Tipple

A

As a general rule “recklessness” is to be given the subjective meaning…. which requires that the accused had a conscious appreciation of the relevant risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Campbell

A

….the appropriate test to apply is that it is possession of foresight that injury will result that must be proved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Morley

A

“Loss is assessed by the extent to which the complainants position prior to the offence has been diminished or impaired”.

C.O.A held that criminality could only arise from direct loss; indirect losses such as expectation loss (loss of a bargain) and loss of anticipated future profits are not included.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Police v Wylie

A

….the conduct of the defendants in this case had definitely reached a stage where it amounted to a real and practical step towards the actual commission of the crime rather than mere preparation… (drug purchase)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Harpur

A

An attempt includes an act or omission constituting a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in his commission of the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly