Case Law 3 of 4 Flashcards
When responding to a domestic dispute
with no exigent circumstances
or evidence of abuse, the police
may not enter a home to conduct a
_____________________ if one resident
gives permission but the other says
no.
search
Georgia v Scott Fitz Randolph, pg. 231 of
your workbook
Police may conduct a warrantless entry
into a suspect’s home based upon
the consent of a 3rd party, when police
believe that 3rd party has common
___________________ over the
premises.
authority
Illinois v Rodriguez, pg. 223 of your workbook
A defendant does not have
a reasonable expectation of
_______________________ in an unlocked
single occupancy restroom in a
public bar.
privacy
State v Boynton, pg. 245 of your workbook
The use of a thermal imaging device
to determine the relative heat
amounts in homes constitute a
______________________.
search
Kyllo v United States, pg. 257 of your
workbook
The police may seize an item
that they have _________________
_______________ to believe is associated
with criminal activity.
probable cause
State v Sansotta, pg. 269 of your workbook
When officers observe and seize incriminating
evidence found in plain view, it
must be “immediately apparent” to the
officers the items are evidence of a crime
or ___________________________.
contraband
Texas v Brown, pg. 271 of your workbook
Law enforcement officers in New Jersey
may not lawfully search citizens’
garbage bags left for collection
without a _________________
_____________________.
search warrant
State v Hempele, pg. 281 of your workbook
A police officer can be ordered to
submit a urine sample based on an
individualized ___________________
_____________________ that the officer
used illicit drugs.
reasonable suspicion
Rawlings v Jersey City PD, pg. 287 of
your workbook
The Fourth Amendment’s prohibition
of unreasonable searches and
seizures also applies to public
________________________ officials
as well as law enforcement officers.
school
State v T.L.O, pg. 291 of your workbook
A government employer does
not need __________________
___________________ or a search warrant
to search employees’ offices, desks,
and file cabinets.
probable cause
O’Connor v Ortega, pg. 293 of your workbook
Evidence observed by a firefighter
while fighting a fire may be seized
under the “___________________
____________________” doctrine.
plain view
Michigan v Tyler, pg. 299 of your workbook
In order for a fire investigator to obtain
an administrative warrant to investigate
the cause of a fire, the investigator
must show that the search will be
_______________________ and minimally
intrusive.
reasonable
Michigan v Tyler, pg. 299 of your workbook
Under New Jersey Law, a seizure occurs
if a police officer’s action would cause a
reasonable person to believe he was not
free to______________________.
leave
State v Tucker, pg. 343 of your workbook
As long as officers have probable
cause or reasonable suspicion to conduct
a stop for a traffic offense, the courts will not question their underlying
________________________ .
motive
Whren v United States, pg. 367 of your
workbook
A law enforcement officer may use
a police car’s mobile data terminal
to randomly run a motorists license
plate, since there is no expectation of
________________________.
privacy
State v Donis, pg. 375 of your workbook
Police may not use their own discretion
to randomly set up a drunk driving
________________________ whenever
and wherever they choose.
roadblock
State v Kirk, pg. 379 of your workbook
During a motor vehicle stop, police may
conduct a limited search of the interior
compartments of the vehicle if
they have reasonable belief the suspect
is dangerous and poses a threat to
them by gaining immediate control of a
________________________.
weapon
Michigan v Long, pg. 385 of your workbook
Police may order the
________________________ out of the
vehicle even though they believe at the
time the person poses no threat to them.
driver
Pennsylvania v Mimms, pg. 387 of your
workbook
Police may not order
________________________ out of a
vehicle, if they believe at the time they
pose no threat to them.
passengers
State v Brian L. Smith, pg. 393 of your
workbook
To order a passenger out of a vehicle,
an officer needs a heightened sense of
_______________________.
danger
State v Brian L. Smith, pg. 389 of your
workbook
The “totality of the
_________________________” test is
endorsed by the New Jersey Supreme
Court.
circumstances
State v Novembrino, pg. 407 of your
workbook
The purpose of the exclusionary
rule is to prevent police
______________________.
misconduct
Mapp v Ohio, pg. 409 of your workbook
A person in custody must receive Miranda
warnings, when that person is going
to be ______________________.
interrogated
Miranda v Arizona, pg. 411 of your workbook
A motorist, under arrest for DWI has no
right to contact an attorney before providing
a _____________________ sample.
breath
State v Green, pg. 433 of your workbook
