Case Law Flashcards
Andy Wightman and Ors v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2018] CSIH 62 –
Could notification be withdrawn?
Much discussion about possibility of revoking notice
Brexit
sought decision whether notification could be revoked as a matter of law. Court of Session made preliminary reference to CJEU. Answer: notification could be revoked.
Elizabeth Webster v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2018] EWHC 1543 Admin
Brexit- had withdrawal been taken?
challenged the decision on basis that referendum act did not stipulate outcome would be legally binding. Challenge failed.
R (on the application of Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Miller No 1) [2017] UKSC 5
Brexit- who has power to notify?
challenged PM’s power to make decision to notify without Parliamentary Approval. UKSC decided that an Act of Parliament was required
Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Württemberg (case 66/85) [1986] ECR 2121 [16-17]
Free movement of persons
Autonomous definition of workers
Free movement of workers shall be secured within the union
Levin v Staatssecretaris van Justitie (case 53/81) [1982] ECR 1035 [17] [16] ‘
Free-movement of workers
Part time workers s45
Case C-292/89 Antonissen [1991] ECR I-745: [11]-[13]
Case 139/85 Kempf vStaatssecretaris vanJustitie [1986] ECR 1741, paragraph 13
Steymann v Staatssecretaris van Justitie (case 196/87) [1988] ECR 6159
Van Gend en Loos Case 26/62 [1963] at 11
Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL vBosman (C-415/93) [1995] ECR I-4921
Clean Car Autoservice GmbH v Landeshauptmann von Wien (C-350/96)[1998] ECR I-2521
Cristini v Société nationale des chemins de fer français (case 32/75) [1975]ECR 1085
Groener v Minister for Education and the City of Dublin VocationalEducational Committee (case 379/87) [1989] ECR 3967
Angonese v Cassa di Risparmio di Bolzano SpA (C-281/98) [2000] ECR I-4139
Commission v Belgium (case 149/79) [1982] ECR 1845
Commission v Italy (case 225/85) [1987] ECR 2625
Commission v Luxembourg (C-473/93) [1996] ECR I-3207
Van Duyn v Home Office (case 41/74) [1974] ECR 1337
Adoui & Cornuaille v Belgium (cases 115 & 116/81) [1982] ECR 1665
R v Bouchereau (case 30/77) [1977] ECR 1999
Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (c-34/09)
• Zhu and Chen v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-200/02) [2004] ECR I-9925
Rendon Marin v Administracion del Estado (c-165/14)
Chavez-Vilchez v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank (C-133/15)
Singh v Minister for Justice and Equality (c-218/14)
Reinhard Gebhard v Consiglio dell’Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano (C-55/94) [1995] ECR I-4165
• Reisebüro Broede v Gerd Sandker (C-3/95) [1996] ECR I-6511
Höfner and Elser v Macrotron GmbH (case C-41/90)
Case 15/74, Centrafarm [1974] ECR 1147], para. 41)
Joined Cases T-68, 77, 78/89, Italian Flat Glass [1992] ECR II-1403, para 357
Whish & Bailey 2018 p131)
Allianz Hungária, Case C-32/11 [2013] 4 CMLR 25, page
Case C-179/90 Merci Convenzionali Porto di Genova[1991] ECR I-5889.
Bayer v Commission (2000)
85/76 Hoffman-La Roche & Co AG v Commission [1979] ECR 461
3)
Case C-379/98 Preussen Elektra AG v Schleswag AG(200
Case C-374/17 A-Brauerei (2018)
Dorsch Consult (C-54/96) [1997] ECR I-4961
Wightman v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (C-621/18) ECLI:EU:C:2018:999
Dorsch Consult (C-54/96) [1997] ECR I-4961