Case Law Flashcards

1
Q

R v Forrest and Forrest

Proving Age

A

The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of the victims age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Taisalika

Intent (serious assaults)

A

The nature of the blow and the gash which it produced point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Collister

Intent

A

Actions or words before, during and after = surrounding circumstances and the nature of the act infer intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Galey

A

Bring together means two or more persons having the common intention to use their combined force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Joyce

A

Must establish at least two people physically present at the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Waters

A

A break in the skin as evidenced by blood flow. However can be internal or external

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Rapana and Murray

A

Covers both permanent and temporary damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v McArthur

A

Bodily harm means hurt or injury that interferes with the health or comfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cameron V R

A

Recklessness is established it the defendant knew actions would bring result, circumstances existed and understood the risk was unreasonable
(Could foresee the consequences but ran the risk and did it anyway)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Sturm

A

Not necessary to prove the intended crime was committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Tihi

A

Two fold test for prosecution to prove Defendant’s intent:

  • intent to facilitate the commission of an imprisonable offence
  • intent to cause the specified harm or recklessness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R V Crossan

A

Incapable of resistance - powerless of the will as well as physical inability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Taisalika (intent)

A

The nature of the blow and gash produced point strongly to necessary intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Strawbridge (Guilty Knowledge)

A

Reverse onus
Knowledge is proved if no evidence contrary accused to prove they acted innocently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Harpur

A

Independent acts when viewed in isolation can be seen as preparatory however when viewed collectively, can be seen as attempts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Police V Parker

A

Use in any manner whatever is to contemplate a situation short of actually firing the weapon and to present a rifle too. I think is equivalent to or means the same thing

17
Q

Simester and Brookbanks

A

Knowing or correctly believing the defendant may believe something wrongly but cannot know something that is false

18
Q

R v Wati

A

There must be proof of the commission or the attempt by

  • person committing assault
  • person or arrest or flight he intends to facilitate
19
Q

R V Tihi

A

Two fold test;
Prosecution to prove Defendant’s intent:
- intent to facilitate the COAIO
- intent to cause the specified harm or reckless

20
Q

R v Sturm

A

Not necessary to prove the intended crime was committed

21
Q

R v koroheke

A

Reproductive organs include internal/external including the vulva, labia and opening of vagina

22
Q

R V Gutuama (Reasonable)

A

No reasonable person would think there was consent

23
Q

R V Forrest v Forrest

A

Best possible evidence adduced from age