Case Law Flashcards
R v Forrest and Forrest
Proving Age
The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of the victims age
R v Taisalika
Intent (serious assaults)
The nature of the blow and the gash which it produced point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent
R v Collister
Intent
Actions or words before, during and after = surrounding circumstances and the nature of the act infer intent
R v Galey
Bring together means two or more persons having the common intention to use their combined force
R v Joyce
Must establish at least two people physically present at the time
R v Waters
A break in the skin as evidenced by blood flow. However can be internal or external
Rapana and Murray
Covers both permanent and temporary damage
R v McArthur
Bodily harm means hurt or injury that interferes with the health or comfort
Cameron V R
Recklessness is established it the defendant knew actions would bring result, circumstances existed and understood the risk was unreasonable
(Could foresee the consequences but ran the risk and did it anyway)
R v Sturm
Not necessary to prove the intended crime was committed
R v Tihi
Two fold test for prosecution to prove Defendant’s intent:
- intent to facilitate the commission of an imprisonable offence
- intent to cause the specified harm or recklessness
R V Crossan
Incapable of resistance - powerless of the will as well as physical inability
R v Taisalika (intent)
The nature of the blow and gash produced point strongly to necessary intent
R v Strawbridge (Guilty Knowledge)
Reverse onus
Knowledge is proved if no evidence contrary accused to prove they acted innocently
R v Harpur
Independent acts when viewed in isolation can be seen as preparatory however when viewed collectively, can be seen as attempts