Case Authorities Flashcards

1
Q

Protects use and enjoyment of land

A

Sadleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Title to sue

A

Hunter v Canary wharf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Not mere licensee

A

Hunter v canary wharf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Adopting the nuisance

A

Sadleigh-denfield v o’callaghan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

rights attached to the land

A

Munro v Southern dairies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Continuing or isolated nuisance

A

Hargrave v Goldman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

substantial interference

A

Munro

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

unreasonable

A

bamford v turnley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

locality

A

Munro

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

time and duration

A

Mckenzie v Powley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

nature of activities

A

Munro

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

alternative means

A

munro

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Abnormal sensitivity

A

hollywood v emmett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

defendant’s motive

A

hollywood v emmett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

duty of care

A

donoghue v stevenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

occupier

A

strong v woolworths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

employers

A

smith v charles baker & sons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

road users

A

imbree v mcneilly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

scope of road users

A

Bourhill v young

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

school authorities

A

commonwealth v introvigne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

professionals

A

rogers v whittaker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

vicarious liability

A

NSW v lepore; hollis v vabu

23
Q

Non delegable duties

A

kondis v state transport authority

24
Q

wrongful mode (employee)

A

bugge v brown

25
Q

multi-factor approach

A

sullivan v moody

26
Q

recognised psychiatric injury

A

Tame v NSW; Annetts v stations

27
Q

reasonable foreseeability in PI

A

gifford v strang patrick stevedoring

28
Q

direct perception, sudden shock, normal fortitude

A

tame v nsw

29
Q

relationship, control, vulnerability

A

Annetts v stations

30
Q

indeterminate liability

A

sullivan v moody

31
Q

economic loss approach

A

fortuna seafoods

32
Q

objective test

A

imbree v mcneilly

33
Q

children in breach

A

mchale v watson

34
Q

skill in breach

A

rogers v whitaker

35
Q

inexperience in breach

A

imbree v mcneilly

36
Q

risk foreseeable and not insignificant

A

wyong shire council v shirt

37
Q

probability, likely seriousness, burden, social utility

A

RTA v Dederer

38
Q

anticipation, customary, statutory and professional

A

wyong shire council v shirt

39
Q

factual causation on the balance of probabilities

A

tabet v gett

40
Q

but for test

A

wallace v kam

41
Q

causation and policy

A

tabet v gett

42
Q

court must be justified

A

fairchild v glenhaven funeral services

43
Q

foreseeability in damage

A

chapman v hearse

44
Q

voluntary act

A

haber v walker

45
Q

contributory negligence

A

josslyn v berryman

46
Q

just and equitable

A

pennington v norris

47
Q

legal risk

A

rootes v shelton

48
Q

joint illegal enterprise

A

miller v miller

49
Q

heads of damages

A

CSR Ltd v Eddy

50
Q

Hospital and medical damages

A

Malec v JC Hutton

51
Q

gratuitous services

A

griffiths v kerkemeyer

52
Q

period of compensation

A

skelton v collins

53
Q

charitable payment

A

zheng v cai

54
Q

sick pay

A

graham v baker