caregiver-infant interactions in humans Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

define attachment

A

infants and caregivers develop deep and lasting emotional bonds - both parties seek closeness and security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the 2 types of caregiver-infant interactions?

A

reciprocity
interactional synchrony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define reciprocity

A

mutual turn-taking form of interaction - respond to each other’s signals and cues e.g. baby smiling back after mother smiles
this develops at a very early age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

study supporting reciprocity

A

Meltzoff & Moore (1977)
experimenter displayed facial gestures (e.g. tongue out, shock face) to 12-21 day old infants
recordings of infant’s responses rated by people blindly
found that infant responses matched the experimenter’s facial expressions
suggest the ability to observe and reciprocate through imitation is present from an early age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define interactional synchrony

A

simultaneous interaction between infant and caregiver - matched and coordinated behaviour and match emotional state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

evidence for interactional synchrony

A

Condon & Sander (1974)
analysed recorded interactions between adults and newborns focusing on babies movements in response to adult speech
found evidence of interactional synchrony via coordination of babies movements and the rhythmic patterns of adult speech
suggests humans have an innate ability for social interaction from birth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

other types of caregiver-infant interactions in humans

A

imitation: infant copies caregiver’s expression
sensitive responsiveness: caregiver interprets meaning of infant’s communication and responds appropriately
child-directed speech: caregiver talks in a ‘sing-song’ tone - slow and high-pitched to keep infant’s attention
body contact: skin-to-skin contact important for bonding e.g. breastfeeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

explain Brazelton et al (1975) experiment

A

aim: to identify trends in mother-baby interactional synchrony
method: taped 12 mother-baby pairs’ play, data was examined to reveal 3 phases of play:
1. attention and build-up
2. recovery
3. turning away
these phases were repeated at regular intervals
conclusion: three phases of play demonstrate the early signs of organised behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Isabella and Belsky (1991) experiment

A

hypothesis: caregiver-baby pairs that developed secure attachment relationships would display more synchronous behaviour than babies with insecure attachments
method: babies ages 3 and 9 months were observed
results: the secure group interacted in a well-timed, reciprocal and mutually rewarding manner
the insecure group were characterised by interactions that were minimally involved, unresponsive and intrusive
avoidant pairs displayed maternal intrusiveness and overstimulation
resistant pairs were poorly coordinated, under-involved and inconsistent
conclusion: this predicted attachment quality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

evaluations of caregiver-infant interactions

A

+ studies use multiple observers that are blind to the true aims of the experiment to provide inter-rater reliability
+ studies use complex cameras to capture all details indicating high internal validity
- infants cannot directly communicate so findings depend on inferences based on observed behaviour - could make wrong assumptions
- social sensitivity is a concern as childrearing techniques may lead to criticism of caregivers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

method of Schaffer and Emerson (1964) experiment

A

studied 60 babies from Glasgow at monthly intervals for 18 months using a longitudinal method
children were studied in their own homes and visited monthly for a year
interactions with their carers were analysed to establish if and when infants started to display separation anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

results of Schaffer and Emerson (1964) experiment

A

separation anxiety occurred in most babies by 25-32 weeks and stranger distress occurs later
18-month follow up:
attachments were most likely to form with carers who were sensitive to the baby’s signals rather than the person spent the most time with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

conclusion made from Schaffer and Emerson’s study

A

results suggest that development occurs in the stages outlined by Schaffer, perhaps being a biologically influenced process
as multiple attachments develop quickly, they are important, not just the primary attachment to the mother, as argued by researchers such as Bowlby
also the quality of caregiver-infant interaction directly impacts the strength of attachment for infants and their mothers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

evaluations for Schaffer and Emerson’s study

A
  • sample may not be generalisable as it only included a group of working-class mothers in the 60s in Glasgow - this culture is not representative of much of the UK or the rest of the world
  • may lack temporal validity as childrearing practices are likely to have changed significantly in the past 50years
    + high level of mundane realism as families were observed in their homes so the experience was normal for the infants - suggests the behaviour recorded was valid
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are the four distinct stages of developmental progress that characterise infants’ attachments?

A

asocial stage (0-6 weeks)
indiscriminate attachments (6 weeks - 6 months)
specific attachment (7months+)
multiple attachments (10-11months+)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

asocial stage

A
  • 0-6 weeks
  • Infant is forming bonds with and recognizes carers
  • Behaviour is similar towards human and non-human objects
  • Babies are happier in the presence of other familiar human
17
Q

indiscriminate attachment

A
  • 6weeks-6months
  • displaying observable social behaviours
  • Preference for people rather than inanimate objects
  • Babies accept cuddles and comfort from any adult, and do not usually show separation or stranger anxiety
18
Q

specific attachments

A
  • Around 7months
  • Majority of babies start to show anxiety towards strangers or when they are separated from one particular adult (65% biological mother)
  • Adult is primary attachment figure but it is not necessarily the person they spend the most time with, but the one who offers the most interaction.
19
Q

multiple attachments

A
  • Secondary attachment to people babies spend a lot of time with
  • Normally occurs before one year - 10/11months+
20
Q
  • evaluations of infant testing: problems with testing infant behaviour
A
  • there are difficulties in reliably testing infant behaviour for example, constant motions of the mouth that babies often do are tested frequently like yawning and smiling making it difficult to distinguish between general activity and specific imitated behaviours
21
Q

how could you overcome the problems surrounding testing infant behaviour?

A

Meltzoff and Moore measured infant responses by filming infants and asking an observer to judge the behaviours solely from the video - the observer had no idea what behaviour was being imitated
increased the internal validity of the data

22
Q
  • evaluations of infant testing: failure to replicate
A
  • a study by Koepke et al (1983) failed to replicate Meltzoff and Moores findings - they counterargued that the research failed because it wasn’t controlled carefully
  • Marian et al (1996) replicated Murray and Trevarthen’s study and found that infants couldn’t distinguish live from videotaped interactions with mothers suggesting that the infants are responding to the adult itself however it acknowledged that the problem lied with the procedure rather than the ability of infants to imitate their caregivers
23
Q

what were Schaffer’s results for primary attachment figures?

A

65% mother only
30% both parents
3% father only

at 18 months, 75% formed attachment to father and showed separation anxiety suggesting fathers play an important role in infant’s lives

24
Q

what is the role of the father?

A

fathers are seen to engage babies in ‘active play’ activities more consistently than mothers
fathers interactions emphasise stimulation and so it is thought their role is to encourage risk-taking behaviours, compared to the more comforting style of mothers

25
Q

what is the role of the father as a primary caregiver in modern western society?

A

mothers are more likely to take part in the workplace
there is evidence to suggest that if men take on role of primary caregivers, their interactional style changes to be more like mothers, increasing their capacity for sensitive responsiveness

26
Q

research evidence in the role of the father

A

Field (1978) observed primary caretaker mothers, primary caretaker fathers and secondary caretaker fathers interacting with their 4-month old infants
found fathers in general focused more on game playing and less on holding
the primary caretaker fathers showed more sensitively responsive behaviour like mothers e.g. used more smiling and child-directed speech than secondary caretaker fathers

27
Q

evaluations for the role of the father research

A
  • socially sensitive research - argued that the role of the mother cannot be replaced by the father may lead to father-led single families and families with 2 fathers feeling they cannot fully provide for the needs of their child
    + research suggests that father’s role is important socially so may give fathers confidence to take a more active role in caregiving
    + economic implications - could lead to equal paternity and maternity leave and reduce the gender pay gap
  • economic implications - reduce economic activity and place pressure on businesses due to less males in the workforce