Caregiver-Infant interactions Flashcards
What are the 2 types of care giver infant interactions?
- Reciprocity
- Interactional synchrony
What is reciprocity?
When a baby and caregive take turns in responding and interacting with eachothers signals and cues.
What is interactional synchrony?
This is a simultaneous interaction between the infant and caregiver who appear to be acting rythmically, with matching, coordinated behaviour.
Interactional synchrony
What did Meltzoff and Moore (1977) experiment find?
- They had displayed facial gestures such as sticking a toungue out and opening their mouth in shock to 12-21 day old infants.
- Recordings of infants responses were rated by people blind to the experiment.
- It was found that infant responses matched the experimenters facial expressions, suggesting the ability to observe and reciprocate through imitation is present from a very early age.
Interactional synchrony
What did Isabella (1989) find?
-Isabella observed 30 mother and babies together and assesed the degree of synchrony, and the quality of mother-baby attatchment.
- They found that high levels of synchrony were associated with better quality mother-baby attatchment.
One strength of research on caregiver infant interactions is that it has video research support.
Research support
- Conodn and Sander (1974) videotaped interactions between adults and infants, focusing on the movements of the infants in response to adult speech.
- Using a detailed frame-by-frame analysis of the video recordings, they found evidence of interactional synchrony/coordination between the infants movements and the rythmic patterns of the adults speech.
- These results suggest that even form birth, humans have an innate ability for social interaction.
One limitation of research into caregiver infant interactions is that it is hard to interpret a babies behaviour.
The difficulty in observing babies
- they are not very co-ordinated. We just observe small gestures and small changes in expression.
- it is also hard to interpret the meaning of babies movements, e.g deciding if a hand movement is a repsonse to the caregiver or just a twitch.
- this means we cannot be certain that any particular interactions observed between the baby and the caregiver are meaningful.
Another limitation is that simply observing a behaviour does not tell us its importance for development.
There is difficulty inferring developmental importance
- Feldman (2012) points out that synchrony and reciprocity simply describe behaviours that occur at the same time.
- These are robust phenomena in the sense that they can be observed, but this may not be useful as it does not tell us their purpose.
- This means that we cannot be certain from observations that reciprocity or synchrony are important in development.