Capital Structure In Practice Flashcards
What are the three questions to ask yourself when it comes to changing the CS?
- To change or not to change the CS?
- If we change, at what speed should we do it?
- How should we change it?
What are the two reasons to change the CS for under-levered firm?
⬆️ MV of firm
Under-levered firms can be subject to hostile takeover
What are the two ways to take over a company? In what context does it happen?
- Agreement
- Buying stocks of the company
When a firm is under-levered.
What are the two reasons not to change the CS for an under-levered firm?
- Maintain financial flexibility
- Possibility to take on debt in the future
- Firm can borrow and buy back shares = ⬆️ D/E)
- Weak tolerance for risk (risk averse)
- Reminder: ⬆️Debt = ⬆️ risk = ⬆️ Default probability
- Preferences of managers and/or SH
What are the two reasons to change the CS for over-levered firm?
- ⬇️ the probability of bankruptcy
- ⬆️ the MV of the firm
What is the reason not to change the CS for over-levered firm?
If the industry or the firm is protected from bankruptcy by the government:
- Guarantees their debt to banks
- Access to capital during financial difficulties
What is the main advantage of fast change of CS?
Rapid increase in firm’s MV
⬆️ MV = ⬆️ Stock price
What is the main advantage of a gradual change of CS?
Does not destabilize the firm environment (allows to adapt and proceed prudently)
- Gives investors more time, they can be cautious
What are the 4 factors to consider to determine the speed of change?
- Confidence of the manager in Optimal CS calculation
- Comparison to industry’s level of financial leverage
- Threat from hostile takeover
- Need for flexibility
Name the speed to take if manager is certain or uncertain on the exact level.
(Factor 1: Confidence in Optimal CS Calculation)
If uncertain: gradual (so manager can take small steps)
If certain: rapidly
Name the speed to take if the optimal CS is different or similar from the level in the industry.
(Factor 2: Comparison to industry’s level of financial leverage)
If Optimal CS is different: gradual (investors will have more time to compare)
If Optimal CS is similar: rapidly
If there is threat from hostile takeover, what should be the speed of the CS change?
If threat: Rapid change
If no threat: Gradual change
If the firm needs flexibility, what is the speed if the firm is under-levered or over-valued?
Firm is under-valued: gradual
Firm is over-valued: rapid
What are the four possible ways to change CS?
- Financial Restructuring
- Sell Asstes
- New project financing
- Change dividend policy
Which approach of CS change is the most direct?
Financial Restructuring
What is the speed of change for the financial restructuring approach?
Rapid
Explain how the financial restructuring approach work for an under-levered or over-levered firm and what happens to the D/E ratio.
If firm is under-levered: issue debt (⬆️Debt), pay dividends, repurchase shares (⬇️E) —> ⬆️ D/E
If firm is over-levered: issue equity (⬆️Equity), reimburse debt —> ⬇️ D/D
What is the inconvenient from the financial restructuring approach?
High issuance costs
Why is paying dividends will reduce a firm’s equity?
Because div are paid from free CF so ⬇️E that belongs to common SH
What is the speed of change for the selling assets approach?
As rapid as selling assets can be
Explain how the selling assets approach work for under-levered and over-levered firms.
Selling assets will provide CF
If under-levered: use the CFs to pay dividends and repurchase stocks
If over-levered: use the CFs to reimburse debt