capital structure in a world of perfect markets Flashcards
what is capital structure
the mix of financing instruments (shares, preferred stock, bonds) a firm uses to fund its investments
- a firms capital structure is broadly composed of debt and equity
what ratios are used to measure the degree of leverage in a company’s financing
- debt-equity ratio = debt/ equity
- debt ratio = debt / (debt + equity)
- shows proportion of total long term financing formed by debt
what are the features of a perfect capital market
- no taxes
- no transaction costs
- no asymmetric information or differences of opinion
- bankruptcy is possible but theres no costs of financial distress
- individuals and firms can borrow and lend at the same interest rate
- investment cash flows are independent of financing choices
these assumptions provide a benchmark world to compare against and so offer insight into the determinants of capital structure
what did Modigliani and Miller show
in a world of perfect capital markets, the choice of capital structure is irrelevant for the valuation of a firm = MM proposition 1
- cash flows generated by the firm’s investments are unchanged when the firm has a different capital structure
- since value of the company is calculated as the present value of future cash flows = the capital structure cannot affect it
- the cash flows are now just allocated differently between equity and debt holders
what does MM show
under MM proposition 1
- value of leveraged firm = value of unleveraged firm
( leveraged = financed by both equity and debt)
(unleveraged = equity financed firm)
shows that it doesn’t matter if an equity investor preferred a different capital structure to the one the firm has chosen
- investors can create their own degree of leverage (homemade leverage)
- if they prefer an alternative capital structure, investors can lend or borrow on their own and achieve the same result
- homemade leverage = perfect substitute for firm leverage in perfect capital markets
what is the cost of capital fallacy
e.g.
XYZ company
- has unleveraged cost of equity of 12%
- cost of debt of 6%
- debt is ‘cheaper’ source of financing
- some would thing XYZ should finance itself with only debt
- could imply that the company would be valued more if 100% debt financed
what is wrong with he argument of cost of capital fallacy
- debt is riskier than equity for the company
- debt involves a contractual obligation to pay interest and repay principal
- equity doesn’t have this legal obligation
- if company cannot meet its obligations = declared bankrupt
- the greater risk of bankruptcy will affect equity investors
- equity investors rank below debt holders in the event of bankruptcy when it comes to repayment of their claim
- increase in debt by company = equity investors increase the required return to compensate for the greater risk
- levered cost of equity (cost of equity when firm also has debt in the capital structure) will rise
what is the cost of capital in a frictionless world
the company cost of capital is independent of leverage and always equal to the unleveraged cost of capital
what is MM proposition 2
cost of equity of a levered firm increases in proportion to the debt-equity ratio
or
cost of capital of levered equity = the cost of capital of unlevered equity plus a premium that is proportional to the ratio of debt to equity
what is earnings per share
EOS = net income/ shares outstanding
- widely used financial performance ratio
- can be a useful metric for evaluating a company’s profitability on a per-share basis