Capital structure Flashcards
Modigliani-Miller Propositions
MM Proposition I without taxes: Capital structure irrelevance
MM Proposition II without taxes: Higher financial leverage raises the cost of equity
MM Proposition I with taxes
MM Proposition II with taxes
MM Proposition I without taxes:
“capital structure irrelevance”
- the MV of a firm is not affected by the capital structure
- the MV of a firm is determined solely by its CF
Value of levered firm = value of unleveled firm
Assumptions
- all investors have homogeneous expectations
- perfect capital markets: no transaction costs, taxes, perfect information
- investors can borrow/ lend at RF rt
- managers will act to max shareholder wealth
- financing and investment decisions are independent of each other
MM Proposition II without taxes
Higher financial leverage raises the cost of equity
- the MV of the firm is unaffected by changes in DE and the WACC remains constant
- the re increases to exactly offset the increased use of cheaper debt in order to maintain a constant WACC
- ie WACC is determined by the business risk of the firm, not by the capital structure
Systematic Risk
- systematic risk or beta of a firm’s assets is a weighted average of systematic risk and its sources of capital
- as the use of debt rises, the risk to equity holders rises, and therefore the equity beta rises
Systematic risk formula
=
Ba = (wd * Bd) + (we * Be)
Ba (asset beta) = %debt * beta debt + %equity * beta equity
Be = Ba + (Ba - Bd) * DE
MM Proposition I with taxes
- interest paid is tax-deductible; the use of debt provides a tax shield that increases the value of a firm
“The value of a levered firm is equal to the value of an unlevered firm plus the value of the debt tax shield”
- WACC will decline as debt increases because of the tax shield
VL = VU + (t * D)
If zimmer corp is financed with 40% debt and 60% equity, the asset beta is 0.7 and the beta of the debt is 0.3, what is the equity beta?
Be = Ba + (Ba - Bd) * DE
Be = 0.7 + (0.7 - 0.3) * 0.4/0.6
Be = .967
A tech firm or an airline company would experience more or less financial distress at or in bankruptcy?
A tech firm would experience higher costs of financial distress in bankruptcy
- the costs of financial distress are lower for companies whos assets have a ready secondary market
- airlines, shipping firms.
The optimal capital structure is
- is the one at which the value of the company is maximized and the WACC is minimized
VL = VU + tD
*analysts and mgmt should focus on the TARGET capital structure; typically unknown to analysts
analysts estimate the target structure by one of these methods:
- assuming the firm’s current capital structure is the target
- examine trends in the firm’s capital structure or statements by mgmt to infer
- use averages of comps
it should be calculated using MV of equity and debt
However, book value (BV) is used in practice since
- MV can fluctuate a lot
- mgmt is concerned with the amt and types of capital invested “by” the firm and not “in” the firm
- lenders and rating agencies typically focus on BV
Free CF hypothesis
- high debt levels discipline managers by forcing them to make fixed debt service payments and by reducing the company’s free cash flow
- the more levered a firm is, the less freedom managers have to misuse cash
- high leverage reduces agency costs
Shareholder theory v stakeholder theory
shareholder theory: the goal of the firm is to maximize shareholder returns
stakeholder theory: the firms focus includes shareholders, customers, employees, suppliers, etc
Debt v equity confict
- debt holders will prefer decisions that reduce the leverage and financial risk of a firm
- common shareholders prefer higher leverage that provides greater return potential