Caparo Test - 2. Proximity Flashcards
1
Q
assumed responsibility by moving drunk officer = sufficient proximity created
A
Barret v MOD
2
Q
decorator service contract to work in house = sufficient proximity (contractual)
A
Stansbie v Troman
3
Q
yacht company were ‘identifiable victims’ = sufficient proximity
A
Home Office v Dorset Yacht
4
Q
informant relationship = sufficient proximity (police assumed responsibility for informant’s welfare)
A
Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria
5
Q
Council did not assume responsibility when it knowingly housed the next door to problem family = insufficient proximity
A
CN & GN v Poole Borough Council
6
Q
No assumed responsibility = insufficient proximity
A
Mitchell v Glasgow City Council