Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

4L CA Wills > CA Wills > Flashcards

CA Wills Flashcards

1
Q

Capacity

A

CIFU

Capacity (presumption in favor of T, rebut by POE): AT THE time of execution the T

  1. Must be able to understand extent and nature of of his prop
  2. Must be able to understand the nature of the testamentary act
  3. Must understand the relations T has to living beneficiaries whose interest are affected by the will

Note: mental disorder NOT a conclusion, apply the test

No capacity: whole will is invalid = intestate succession unless prior valid will because will2 could not have revoked will1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Insane dilusion

A

CIFU
AT the time of execution T suffered from ID

  1. False belief
  2. Product of a sick mind
  3. No evidence to support the belief
  4. Delusion MUST have affected T’s will

NOTE: narrow issue than Capacity, IC raises a presumption but cure w/capacity test

Consequence: only that part (gift or whole will) affected is invalid, thus: residuary if any, or intestate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fraud

A

CIFU

Representation of material fact, known to be false to wrongdoer, for the purpose of action or inaction and in fact induces the action or inaction

Fraud in execution (forgery of T’s signature or T is given doc puportedly non-testamentary): ENTIRE will is invalid thus prop passes by intestate succession unless prior validly will (will2 by fraud would not have revoked will1)

Fraud in inducement (Fraud affects CONTENTS of the will): Only part affected by fraud is invalid thus prop goes to residuary devisee, if none to heirs at law, or constructive trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Undue Influence

A

CIFU

Definition: a will is invalid if obtained through duress, menace or UI that subjugates T’s free will

At the time of execution

Susceptibility (financial, psychological, etc): T has weakness as to have his free will subjugated

Opportunity: wrongdoer had access to T

Motive/Disposition to influence for the purpose of personal benefit

Causation is the result of of UI

If SOMEC then presumption may arise by:

  • Confidential relationship between T and ben (CA recognizes CL relationship including friends)
  • Ben participated in any way in procuring will or some significant activity related to execution of the will

Consequence: if will affected, will fails OR if part, then part fails: residuary devisee, intestacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Statutory Presumption of UI

A

CIFU

Definition: a will is invalid if obtained through duress, menace or UI that subjugates T’s free will

CA law statutorily presumes that provision of an instrument making a donative transfer to the following persons is the product of UI:

  1. person who drated the instrument +drafter’s spouse or 3rd degree fam (conclusive)
  2. person in fiduciary relationship w/T (e.g. trustee, atty - rebuttable by CCE - Conclusive for: fiduciary’s spouse or 3rd degree fam)
  3. care custodian but only if instrument is executed during the period in which the custodian provided services to T, OR w/in 90 days before or after such period (rebuttable by CCE - Conclusive for: care custodian, shareholder, employee of firm’s spouse or 3rd degree fam)

Statutory presumption does NOT apply to:

  1. donative transfer to spouse of T, cohabitant of T, or blood relative w/in 4th degree of T
  2. instrument is drafted or transcribed by T’s spouse or blood relative w/in 4th degree of T
  3. instrument reviewed by IA

Consequence: if part of willl affected then transferee is deemed to have predeceased T w/o spouse OR issue thus gift lapses thus passes to residuary devisee then intestate succession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mistake in Content

A

Wrong ben is named or wrong gift is made

  1. Mistake in omission: NOT added because Cts do not re-write wills
  2. Mistake in addition: Ct may strike out because Ct is excising part of the will
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mistake in Execution

A

Wrong doc is signed thus will is NOT probated

Exception: mutual wills, Ct may reform the wills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mistake in Inducement

A

A gift is made OR not based on T’s erroneous belief

Exception (mistake on face of will): if mistake and what T would have done but for the mistake appear ON THE FACE of the will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mistake in Description (Ambiguity)

A

No one or nothing fits the description OR two or more persons fit the description

CA: introduce parole evidence to explain then to resolve a latent AND resolve patent ambiguity to determine T’s intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dependent Relative Revocation

A

If testator revokes will (OR portion) upon mistaken assumption of law or fact that substantially identical will/codicil effectuates the intent, then the revocation of will1 is ineffective if testator would not have revoked the will1 but for the mistaken belief.

Key: ESSENTIALLY similar provisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

CA’s lost will provisions

A

A lost will OR ACCIDENTALLY destroyed (thus T did not intend to revoked) will can be probated w/adequate proof.

Proof: Copy of a will, or person w/personal knowledge testifies as to the terms of the will (e.g. atty who drafted the will)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Revival of revoked wills

A

If Will1 is revoked by Will2, thereafter will2 is revoked = both are revoked

UNLESS from circumstances of revocation (physical or by writing revocation) of will2 (w/extrinsic evidence), or T’s declaration, that T intended will1 to take effect as executed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Pretermitted/Omitted Children

A

A child born/adopted AFTER all testamentary instruments are exectued and is not provided for in any testamentary instrument

Takes intestate share T owned at death

Exception:

  1. T failed to provide for C in testamentary instrument AND intention appears from testamentary instrument
  2. T had one or more C and T transfered substantially all of T’s estate to parent of omitted child
  3. T provided for C outside the testamentary instrument w/intent that transfer was in lieu of any testamentary provision

Exception to exception: if child born/adopted BEFORE testamentary instrument may still take if the ONLY reason child is not provided for is because T’s mistakely thought child was dead/non-existent

Abatement to give C intestate share: abate prop not passing by will, THEN from all bens in proportion to the value of the gift received

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Omitted Spouse

A

A surviving spouse who marries T AFTER testamentary instrument is executed and is not provided for in any testamentary instrument

Takes statutory share equal to spouse’s intestate share

Exception:

  1. T’s failure to provide for spouse in testamentary instrument AND intention appears from the testamentary instrument
  2. T provides for spouse outside the testamentary instrument w/intention that transfer was in lieu of any testamentary provision
  3. Waiver by spouse

Abatement to give spouse statutory share: abate prop not passing by will, THEN from all bens in proportion to the value of the gift received

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Validate docs w/in or outside the will

A

Integration

Incorp by reference

Acts of indep siginificance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Integration

A

Additional docs which form part of the will

Prove Intent + Presence by physical connection or logical connection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Incorp by reference

A
  1. A writing/doc
  2. In existence AT THE TIME will is executed
  3. Language of the will clearly ID the writing/doc
  4. Language of the will manifests T’s intent (implied if 1-3)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Acts of indep significance

A

Docs (parole evidence) effectuated during T’s lifetime primarily for nontestamentary purposes are used for ID ben, ID gift in the will

Q: even w/o Will, will this fact have existed?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Attested Formal Will elements

A

Traditional formalities:

  1. Writing
  2. Signed by T, tp in T’s presence AND at direction of incapacitated T, or conservator
  3. Signing by T (or T’s A) in the presence (sight OR conscious: W’s hearing and W knows about the act) of two W both present at the same time

CA: W do not need to sign in the presence of each other, nor in the presence of T

  1. Signing by W during T’s lifetime
  2. W understand the instrument is T’s will

CA: T does not need to declare “this is my will” to W

CA: if T dies after 2009 apply CC std for 3,4,5 (cannot be used for 1,2)

CA: if T dies prior 2009 and W signed before T and no fraud issues, then will is valid under CA’s substantial compliance doctrine

20
Q

Holographic Will

A
  1. Singed by T anywhere in the will
  2. Material provision of will MUST be in T’s handwriting

Note: extrinsic evidence (e.g. T told others list is his will) used to prove T’s intent (e.g. if T writes list of names + asset T owns)

  1. Dates NOT required but on analysis invalidate to extent of inconsistency of undated HW
21
Q

IW

A

Note: need TWO disinterested W

A IW is a W beneficiary under the will

Will is NOT invalidated because of IW, BUT for IW’s taking a rebuttable presumption that W procured the device by duress, menace, fraud or UI arises.

BOP: CCE

If IW cannot rebut, IW is restricted to intestate share

22
Q

Codicil

A

A testamentary instrument executed w/in CA probate code which modifies amends or revokes a will.

Codicil republishes a will

Codicil is ITSELF a testamentary instrument (for pretermission use this but do not mention republication)

23
Q

Revocation of Codicil

A

If T executes W then codicil then revokes codicil: rebutable presumption that ONLY codicil is revoked

If T executes W then codicil then revokes W: rebutable presumption that T intended to revoke W AND codicil

24
Q

Revocation by physical act

A
  1. Will is destroyed (cancelled: lining/crossing out, obliterated: erasing)
  2. Simultaneous intent to revoke
  3. By T or in T’s presence at his direction

Note: cancellation invalidates gift but DRR saves it ONLY if gift increased because T’s intent is on the face of the will

Note: cancellation (writing Null and Void, EVEN w/o signature) is stil a valid cancellation

25
Q

Mutilated Will

A

If W is found mutilated at T’s death + last seen in T’s possession there is a rebutable presumption that T mutiliated w/intent to revoke

26
Q

Revocation by writing

A

Expressed: if will2 expressly states

Implied: if will2 totatlly disposes T’s estate

27
Q

Ademption of specific and general

A

ONLY specific gifts adeem by extinction

ONLY general gifts adeem by satisfaction

28
Q

Ademption by extinction

A

Determine if itent of T was for a specific vs general gift, then if specific determin if intent was for gift to fail

29
Q

Ademption by satisfaction

A

T gives the beneficiary an intervivos down payment on a device.

Established by:

  1. Provided for in Will
  2. T declares in writing
  3. Ben declares in writing
  4. Prop given is the same prop that is the subject of a specific gift to ben

Note:

Ademption deals w/testacy

Advancement deals w/intestacy

30
Q

Advancement

A

Intestate gives an intevivos down payment to an heir apparent

Esbalished by:

  1. Intestate declares in writing
  2. Heir declares in writing

Note:

Ademption deals w/testacy

Advancement deals w/intestacy

31
Q

K to make OR not make will

A
  1. Material provision are in the testamentary instrument

OR

  1. Express reference to K in the testamentary instrument

OR

  1. Writing by T evidencing a K

OR

  1. CCE of a K between T and promisee enforceable by equity

OR

  1. CCE of a K between T and Other for the benefit of claimant

Cause of action accrues: Cause of action accrues when decedent dies

Remedies: damages, specific performance, constructive trust

32
Q

Mutual Wills

A

Separate wills of two or more people which are reciprocal

Note: Execution of a mutual will does NOT create a presumption to not revoke or make a will

33
Q

CP

A

All prop acquired during marriage while domiciled in CA that is not SP

34
Q

Quasi-CP

A

All prop (personal or real) situated in CA acquired by decedent while domiciled outside of CA that would have been CP if decedent had been domiciled in CA at the time of acquisition

Treated as SP before decedent’s death (thus surviving spouse cannot dispose of quasiCP while acquiring spouse is alive), treated as CP after death

35
Q

SP

A

Prop acquired before marriage AND during marriage by gift, bequest, devise, and descent together w/rents, issues, and profits thereof

36
Q

Per Capita/Representation

A

If issue take by intestacy OR will provides for issue w/o specifying manner then issue of same degree take per capita w/right of representation

37
Q

Strict per stirpes

A

If will distributes “per stirpes” or “by right of rep” or “representation” = strict per stirpes: distribution at first level of generation

38
Q

Adopted Children

A

AC or C born out of wedlock is treated the same as a natural C of the decedent/adopting parent

AC inherits through adoptive parents and inheritance rights to natural parents are cut off. Except: spouse of one natural parent adopts OR after one natural parent dies

39
Q

Lapse and anti-lapse

A

Lapse

If beneficiary is required to survive T, and ben predeceases then gift lapses BUT ONLY if anti-lapse does NOT apply

Anti-lapse

ONLY if devisee who predeceased T is:

  1. kindred (blood relative) of T
  2. kindred (blood relative) of surviving spouse
  3. kindred (blood relative) of deceased spouse
  4. kindred (blood relative) of former spouse

AND devisee leaves issue

NOTE: devisee cannot be spouse

40
Q

Simultaneous Death

A

(Intestate only) If T and heir die and it cannot be established by CCE that heir survivied by 120hrs then it’s deemed heir predeceased and estate is distributed per capita by right of survivorship

(Testate) If T and devisee die and it cannot be established by CCE that devisee survivied then it’s deemed devisee predeceased T and gift passes either through lapse or anti-lapse

(Testate) If T and spouse die (or A and B are JT) and it cannot be established by CCE that one spouse survived the other AND title of prop depends upon priority of death, then prop of each will be treated as if one survived the other

41
Q

Abatement

A

Process by which certain gifts are decreased to pay share of: Omitted Spouse, and Omitted/pretermitted C

Abatement to give C intestate share or statutory share to spouse: abate prop not passing by will, THEN from all bens in proportion to the value of the gift received

42
Q

Order to pay off GENERAL debts

A
  1. Intestate prop
  2. Residuary gifts
  3. General gifts to non-relatives
  4. Gen gifts to relatives
  5. Specific to non-relatives
  6. Specific to relatives
43
Q

Exoneration

A

Devisee take specific gifts (e.g. RP) subject to encumbrances (e.g. mortgage), unless T’s will states that specific gift is to be exonerated to pay off the encumbering debt.

Does not affect other specific gifts to abate unless contrary intent is in the will

44
Q

Slayer

A

If S intentionally and feloneously kills decedent, S is treated as having died intestate before T (anti-lapse does NOT apply)

45
Q

Not part of the estate

A

bank acct (Jt w RS)

IRA (beneficiary designation)

LI (beneficiary designation) because they are based on the K

46
Q

ERISA

A

Regardless of title (e.g. POD, etc) spouse can assert right to CP share even if non-contributing to plan or married after plan is created

Exception: retirement plan belonging to testator and spouse waives (Not favored in Ct)

47
Q

Joint Accts or Survivor Accts

A

Title controls BUT if extrinsic evidence is admissible to show T’s intent NOT to make a gift but rather a convenience for paying T’s bills

4L CA Wills (2 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions