C3211 Final Flashcards
D-Block Elements
Arising from filling of 3d, 4d, and 5d subshells
Transition Elements
Has an incomplete d subshell. Group 12 elements (Zn,Cd,Hg) are d-block elements but not transition elements
Characteristic properties of lanthanides and actinides (3):
- Lustrous, malleable, high electrical and thermal conductivities. High melting/boiling points. Hard and strong.
- Multiple oxidation states
- Lewis acid properties; strong tendency for forming coordination cmpds with Lewis bases
Why are they called ‘complex’ compounds?
Bc of difficulties they caused for chemists studying them
What type of interaction is present in a coordinate bond?
Its a combination of an interaction based on electrostatics and covalent interaction
Denticity
Describes number of donor atoms contained by a ligand
Chelating ligands
Form a ring with the central metal; chelate means crab’s claw.
What denticity of ligands are important as bioinorganic ligands?
Tridentate and multidentate ligands; porphyrins, corrins, etc.
Common ligands
See flash cards
Alfred Werner
Identified geometries of d-metal complexes. He studied Co3+. Noticed different colors.
How did Werner characterize and separate very similar complexes (CoCl3 with NH3)?
He used silver nitrate to precipitate out AgCl, which indicates the strength of Cl- association.
What did Werner suggest from his studies?
Complexes possessing six ligands attached to each Co3+ ions. Differentiated primary and secondary valence to distinguish strong and weak bonds.
Rules for Naming Complexes
Review
Coordination number
Number of ligand metal interactions
Inner sphere complexes
Ligands directly attach to central metal
Outer sphere complexes
Ion pairs and a secondary coordination sphere
What 3 factors determine coordination number?
- Size of central atom/ion
- Steric interaction between ligands
- Electronic interactions
CN 1 or 2 (Description)
Very rare. Requires very bulky ligands to protect the coordination sphere of the metal. Later transition metals.
CN 1 or 2 (example)
CN=1: [2,3,5-Ph3C6H2Cu]
CN=2: Hg(Ch3)2
CN of 3 (description)
Preferred by later TMs. CN may not be apparent from written formula as bridging may occur.
CN of 3 (example)
K[Cu(CN)2]
CN of 4 (description)
Very common; favored for early TMs, especially 3d, and large ligands.
Geometries of CN 4
Tetrahedral
Square Planar
What metal configuration typically form square planar complexes?
d8
Ex of CN 4
Pt(Cl2(NH3)2)
CN of 5 (description)
Less common, but important for reactivity and rxn mechanisms.
Geometries of 5 CN complexes
Square pyramidal
Trigonal bipyramidal
What influences geometry of CN 5?
Ligands strongly influence which geometry is observed. They also may interconvert
Berry pseudorotation
Common mechanism of interconversion between geometries of CN5 complexes. Can be studied with NMR
CN 6 (description)
Most common. Almost all octahedral (trigonal prismatic sometimes). Distortions are possible. Possess cis/trans and fac/mer isomerism.
Higher coordination numbers than 6
CN7 or CN8 is possible for 4d and 5d and lanthanides. Less common though.
Formal oxidation state of metal in complexes
- Identify charges on the ligands
- Look at total charge of molecule
- Charge L + MOS = total charge
Electron Configurations in Complexes
nd orbitals are lower in E than (n+1)s orbitals, so 3d becomes filled before 4s.
Electron counting rules for number of d electrons
- Count total number VE
- Deduce OS
- Subtract
Types of isomerism:
- Solvent isomers
- Ionization isomers
- Coordination isomers
- Linkage isomers
- Stereoisomers
Chirality
cannot be superimposed on their own mirror image and have the ability to polarize light
Lambda isomers
Has a left-handed (counterclockwise) screw axis
Delta isomers
Have a right-handed (clockwise) screw axis
Is there a correlation between delta/lambda and optical rotation?
Each isomer may cause + or - rotation; different for each compound
Enantiomers
Have the same physical properties of solubility, melting point, etc. There are chiral separation columns. Some synthesis methods involve preceding to make one stereoisomer more soluble than the other.
What chelation rings are preferred?
5 or 6 membered rings
Ionization Isomerism
Compounds that have the same formula but differ in their ion arrangement in solution (i.e. differ in inner/outer spheres)
Coordination Isomerism
Overall ratio of ligands to metals remains constant, but arrangement of coordination sphere around each metal varies.
Linkage isomerism
Some ligands possess different donor atoms. Many factors impact the bonding, such as solvent and HSAB.
What must any theory of bonding seek to explain?
- Physically observed behaviour of complexes
What specific questions do we ask about bonding in complexes?
- Why do certain metals and ligands favour particular oxidation states and geometries
- Can we account for colours of complexes
- Can we account for magnetic properties of complexes
- Why are some compounds more reactive than others?
Crystal Field Theory
Simple model that is based on the assumption that the metal-ligand interaction is primarily electrostatic
Details of CFT
-Simplify ligands to be point charges
-Positive charge of nucleus attracts the ligands
-Transition M has partially filled d orbitals which have repulsive interactions with the ligand, the magnitude of which depends on the angle of approach.
-D orbitals split.
Describe general CFT splitting in octahedral geometry
Interaxial orbitals are stabilized by 2/5 do, axial orbitals are destabilized by 3/5 do
Draw CFT for octahedral
See notes
What does CFT fail to describe?
Covalent interactions or possible multiple metal-ligand bonds
Barycentre
Mean energy of orbitals
How are electrons filled in CFT octahedral split d orbitals?
Depends on delta octahedral vs. pairing energy
Labels for upper/lower split CFT octahedral orbitals
Upper: eg
Lower: t2g
Delta Octahedral
Energy difference between eg and t2g sets
How can do be measured?
Using UV-Vis
Crystal field stabilization energy (CFSE)
Measure of net E of occupation of d-orbitals relative to their mean energy
Ligand Field Theory
Incorporates overlap of metal-based d-orbitals with ligand orbitals of suitable symmetry
What does LFT try to explain?
Effect of different ligands on do
Spectrochemical series
Arranged in order of increasing energy transitions that occur in their complexes
Strong-field ligand
High energy transition, large do
Weak-field ligand
low-energy transition, small do
How does do depend on the metal ion?
-Value of do increases with increasing oxidation number and increases down a group
-Oxidation state reflects smaller size of highly charged ions, therefore closer metal ligand contacts and stronger interaction energy
- Increase down a group because larger size of 4d and 5d orbitals produce better orbital overlap and a stronger metal ligand interaction
How to obtain electron configuration for octahedral complex
- Use orbital E levels obtained in CFT as a basis for applying the Aufbau principle
- Obeys Pauli exclusion principle, maintaining 2 electrons per orbital with opposite spins
- If more than one degenerate orbital is available, obey Hund’s rule of max multiplicity by placing electrons in separate orbitals singly with parallel spins
What results if do is smaller than P?
high spin
What results if do is larger than P?
low spin
Do we typically see low or high spin for 4 and 5d metals?
Low spin; do is higher than for 3d metals
Diamagnetic
No unpaired electrons; repelled by a magnetic field (very slightly)
Paramagnetic
At least one unpaired electron; drawn into a magnetic field. Much stronger than diamagnetism
Measure of magnetism
Magnetic Susceptibility