C10.1- Social Security Systems Flashcards
How to finance a social security scheme
- Set initial and future contribution rates are levels that are affordable and acceptable for parties involved
- Match the accumulation of any reserves built up to the investment needs and capacity of the economy
In which circumstances does the financing method used become important?
- System matures
- Benefits change
- Population ages
Arguments for and against funding social security systems in advance
+ Increased level of savings
+ Develops capital markets
+ Eases pressure of ageing population
+ Investment returns reduce long term cost of benefits
- Overall savings may not rise, are just redirected.
- Even if they do, may not create real investment
- Doesn’t solve problems of ageing population
- Transition to funding in advance can be problematic
- Fund may be a political temptation
Name three approaches to financing social security systems
- Pay as you go
- General average premium
- Terminal funding
Give the contribution rate for PAYG
CR = (benefits paid in the year) / (total salaries of contributing population in the year)
Problems with funding a social security scheme using PAYG
As the population ages or system mature the contribution rate tends to rise and is likely to vary each year so is not practical administratively
Describe two variants of PAYG
Smoothed - contribution rates are set in advance and a contingency reserve is built up to maintain cashflows
Equalised - an equalised contribution rate is calculated in advance so expected income covers expected benefits over a control period. For a mature system, a fund is built up at the start of the period and drawn down later in the period
Give the contribution rate initially set under GAP
CR = (PV of all future benefits) / (PV of total salaries of contributing population in all future years)
Note this allows for new future entrants
How does the GAP contribution rate differ at future valuations
The contribution rate is set such that a level rate will be payable throughout the lifetime of the scheme
So a relatively high rate will be payable when the scheme is first established compared with PAYG
At future valuations the contribution rate needs to take account of the fund built up
How does the GAP contribution rate compare to that under PAYG?
For new schemes with no pay service, then initially and until the system matured the GAP CR > PAYG CR
So annual contributions and investment income will exceed the benefit outgo and a fund is built up to meet future expenditure
Give conditions required for a stable contribution under GAP?
- Assumptions borne out in practice
- Assumptions not changed over time
- No change in contribution or benefit structure
Give the contribution rate under terminal funding
CR = (PV benefits awarded in year t) / (PV of total salaries of contributing population in year t)
Ie the contribution income required in a period is the amount required to finance the capital value of benefits awarded in that period
So benefits are prefunded at the time they are awarded
Changing from PAYG to funded
Funded approach requires transition during which contributions are required to provide benefits for both current and future generations. May be politically bad
Could make a gradual change by making a gradual adjustment though the general tax system. Only acceptable if level of tax would otherwise been reduced
Could issue government debt. Avoids double payment but debt needs to be serviced and relies on investment market