C+D - Functionalism Flashcards
Functionalist view of crime
It is inevitable and positive
What can too much crime cause
Anomie - social breakdown
Why is crime inevitable for society (2)
- not everyone has been socialised into the same norms and values
- some groups have different subcultures which can be seen as deviant to mainstream culture
Durkheim’s functions of crime (2)
- boundary maintenance
- adaptation and change
Cohen’s function of crime
To show that an institution isn’t functioning correctly. For example if truancy is higher then it might mean the education system isn’t meeting the needs of pupils
Boundary maintenance
To bring social solidarity
Adaptation and change
To challenge the existing norms and values, for example the black power movement
Criticisms to the functions (3)
- they don’t explain why crime exists in the first place
- ignore how crime impacts the individual
- crime doesn’t always bring social solidarity, eg if there’s a rapist then women will stay inside out of fear
What is strain theory
when people commit crime as they can’t achieve goals through legitimate means
- he combines structural factors and cultural factors to explain it
What is the American dream
A goal that can be achieved through hard work and self discipline. Is based off of meritocracy and equal opportunity
What is the reality of the American dream
Many groups cannot achieve this due to inequality of opportunity. This can cause frustration so they use illegitimate means to achieve it
who talks about strain theory and the American dream
Merton
Merton - Adaptations to strain (5)
- conformity - accepting the goals and achieving them legitimately
- innovation - accepting the goals but using illegitimate means to achieve them
- ritualism - giving up on goals but following the rules
- retreatism - giving up on goals and legitimate means. Become dropouts, eg drug addicts and dropouts
- rebellion - rejecting the goals but aiming to replace them and bring revolutionary change
Strengths of Merton (4)
- shows how different behaviours can arise from the same goal
- both conformists and innovators want money just in different means
- explains how most crime is utilitarian due to the value of material wealth
- explains that lower class crimes are higher due to having the least opportunity
Criticisms of Merton (5)
- sees crime as mainly a wc phenomenon
- too deterministic as not all wc deviate even when they face the most strain
- Marxists say it ignores how the ruling class makes laws to criminalise the wc
- assumes there’s a value consensus that everyone wants money
- only accounts for utilitarian crime