Business Organizations Flashcards
What are the elements necessary for formation of an agency?
A fiduciary relationship (obligation to act for another’s benefit) is created between the principal and the agent which requires:
- (1) mutual manifestation of assent between principal and agent;
- (2) the agent will act on the principal’s behalf; and
- (3) will be subject to the principal’s control.
In order to create an agency there must be an agreement, but not necessarily a contract between the parties.
- An agreement may result in the creation of an agency relationship although the parties did not call it an agency and did not intend the legal consequences of the relation to follow.
The existence of the agency may be proved by circumstantial evidence which shows a course of dealing between the two parties.
- When an agency relationship is to be proven by circumstantial evidence, the principal must be shown to have consented to the agency since one cannot be the agent of another except by consent of the principal.
Is an agency relationship subject to contract law?
No, an agency relationship is not itself a contract.
But an agent and a principal can enter into a contract that describes each other’s obligations.
- An agent has a duty to act in accordance with the express and implied terms of any contract between the agent and the principal.
Are undisclosed principals subject to liability for the acts of their agents?
Yes. An undisclosed principal who entrusts an agent with the management of his business is subject to liability to third persons with whom the agent enters into transactions usual in such businesses and on the principal’s account, although contrary to the directions of the principal.
This means that the agent may have certain powers to bind the principal despite any contract provision.
Who has the power to terminate an agency?
Both the principal and the agent have the power to end the agency at any time.
The power to terminate does not depend upon the existence of or conformity with an agreement between the agent and the principal. Exercising the power to terminate may constitute a breach of contract. The power to terminate stems from the character of actual authority, which assumes ongoing and manifest assent that is operative when an agent takes action.
How are the rules of Agency, as we have seen them, modified or expanded by discussion of the creditor-debtor relationship and when it turns into an agency?
A creditor who assumes control of his debtor’s business for the mutual benefit of himself and his debtor, may become a principal, with liability for the acts and transactions of the debtor in connection with the business.
- Mere exercise of veto power over purchase/sales over specified amount does not create agency.
- Taking over management and directing what contracts may or may not be made creates an agency.
- Creditor becomes principal when creditor assumes de facto control over debtor.
How are the rules of Agency, as we have seen them, modified or expanded by discussion of the buyer-supplier relationship and when it turns into an agency?
One who contracts to acquire property from a third person and convey it to another is the agent of the other only if it is agreed that he is to act primarily for the benefit of the other and not for himself. Factors indicating that the one who is to acquire the property and transfer it to the other is selling to, and not acting as agent for, the other are:
- (1) That he is to receive a fixed price for the property, irrespective of the price paid by him. This is the most important.
- (2) That he acts in his own name and receives the title to the property which he thereafter is to transfer.
- (3) That he has an independent business in buying and selling similar property.
What is the capacity required to create an agency?
An individual has capacity to act as principal in a relationship of agency as defined if, at the time the agent takes action, the individual would have capacity if acting in person.
- Minors do not have the capacity to be a principal but do have the capacity to be an agent because under the restatement, any person may ordinarily be empowered to act so as to affect the legal relations of another.
- Under the law relating to promoters, if a corporation does not exist, then it may not be bound until it exists and later ratifies the contract. Until then, the promoters are bound.
When does an agent act with actual authority?
Actual authority arises when at the time of taking action that has legal consequences for the principal, the agent:
- (1) reasonably believes,
- (2) in accordance with the principal’s manifestations to the agent
- (3) that the principal wishes the agent to so act.
Actual authority includes express and implied:
- Express authority is that specifically mentioned by the principal in setting out the extent of the agent’s duties.
- Implied authority of a corporate officer or agent includes all such incidental authority as is necessary, usual, and proper to effectuate the main authority expressly conferred.
When does an agent act with apparent authority?
Apparent authority arises when at the time of taking action that has legal consequences for the principal, a third party:
- (1) reasonably believes,
- (2) in accordance with the principal’s manifestations to the third party,
- (3) that the agent has authority to act on behalf of the principal.
What are the three ways to establish apparent authority?
(a) The principal expressly and directly tells a third person that a second person has authority to act on the principal’s behalf.
(b) If a principal allows an agent to occupy a position which, according to the ordinary habits of people in the locality, trade, or profession, carries a particular kind of authority, then anyone dealing with the agent is so justified in inferring that the agent has such authority.
(c) By allowing an agent to carry out prior similar transactions, a principal creates the appearance that the agent is authorized to carry out such acts subsequently.
What are the three kinds of principals (relative to the degree to which a third party knows their identity)?
A principal is disclosed if, when an agent and a third party interact, the third party has notice that the agent is acting for a principal and has notice of the principal’s identity.
A principal is undisclosed if, when an agent and a third party interact, the third party has no notice that the agent is acting for a principal.
A principal is unidentified if, when an agent and a third party interact, the third party has notice that the agent is acting for a principal but does not have notice of the principal’s identity.
If an agent with actual/apparent authority makes a contract on behalf of a disclosed principal, who are the parties to the contract?
When an agent acting with actual or apparent authority makes a contract on behalf of a disclosed principal,
- (1) the principal and the third party are parties to the contract; and
- (2) the agent is not a party to the contract unless the agent and third party agree otherwise.
If an agent with actual authority makes a contract on behalf of an undisclosed principal, who are the parties to the contract?
When an agent acting with actual authority makes a contract on behalf of an undisclosed principal, unless excluded by the contract,
- (1) the principal is a party to the contract;
- (2) the agent and the third party are parties to the contract.
The third party does not know there is a principal, so there can’t be a manifestation from the principal to the third party that the agent is the principal’s agent.
If an agent with actual/apparent authority makes a contract on behalf of an unidentified principal, who are the parties to the contract?
When an agent acting with actual or apparent authority makes a contract on behalf of an unidentified principal,
- (1) the principal and the third party are parties to the contract; and
- (2) the agent is a party to the contract unless the agent and the third party agree otherwise.
Can an agent be a party to a contract if the principal does not exist or lacks capacity?
Yes, unless the third party agrees otherwise, a person who makes a contract with a third party “as an agent of a principal” becomes a party to the contract if the purported agent knows or has reason to know that the purported principal does not exist or lacks capacity to be a party to a contract.
If a person makes a contract with a third party on behalf of a principal, but lacks such authority, have they breached any warranty to the third party?
Yes. They breach an implied warranty of authority to the third party unless:
- (a) the principal or purported principal ratifies the act;
- (b) the person gives notice to the third party that no warranty of authority is given; or
- (c) the third party knows that the person acts without actual authority.
If a third party finds out that an undisclosed principal is the principal, may the third party avoid the contract?
Yes. When an agent, who makes a contract or conveyance on behalf of an undisclosed principal, falsely represents to the third party that the agent does not act on behalf of a principal, the third party may avoid the contract or conveyance if the principal or agent had notice that the third party would not have dealt with the principal.
Can principals be liable for acts of the agents under estoppel?
Yes. A principal who is not otherwise liable as a party to a transaction purportedly done by the agent on that principal’s account is subject to liability to a third party who justifiably is induced to make a detrimental change in position because the transaction is believed to be on the principal’s account, if
- (a) the principal intentionally or carelessly caused such belief, or
- (b) having notice of such belief and that it might induce others to change their positions, the principal did not take reasonable steps to notify them of the facts.
Is an agent subject to liability to a third party harmed by the agent’s tortious conduct where the conduct was properly within the scope of employment?
Yes, an agent is subject to liability to a third party harmed by the agent’s tortious conduct. Unless an applicable statute provides otherwise, an actor remains subject to liability although the actor acts as an agent or an employee, with actual or apparent authority, or within the scope of employment.
If an agent harms a third party in the scope of the agency and in so doing breaches a duty of care owed (solely) to the principal, can the third party raise that breach as a basis for the agent’s liability to the third party?
No, an agent’s breach of a duty owed to the principal is not an independent basis for the agent’s tort liability to a third party. An agent is subject to tort liability to a third party harmed by the agent’s conduct only when the agent’s conduct breaches a duty that the agent owes to the third party.
When is a principal subject to direct liability to a third party harmed by an agent’s conduct?
When the agent acts with actual authority or the principal ratifies the agent’s conduct and:
- (a) the agent’s conduct is tortious;
- (b) the agent’s conduct, if that of the principal, would subject the principal to tort liability;
- (c) the principal is negligent in selecting, supervising, or otherwise controlling the agent; or
- (d) the principal delegates performance of a duty to use care to protect other persons or their property to an agent who fails to perform the duty.
When is a principal subject to vicarious liability to a third party harmed by an agent’s conduct?
When (a) the agent is an employee who commits a tort while acting within the scope of employment or (b) the agent commits a tort when acting with apparent authority in dealing with a third party on or purportedly on behalf of the principal.
An employee’s conduct was within the scope of employment if:
- (1) the conduct occurred substantially within the time and space limits authorized by the employment;
- (2) the employee was motivated, at least partially, by a purpose to serve the employer; and
- (3) the act was of a kind that the employee was hired to perform.
Are employers liable for tortious conduct committed by employees if the action was done on a detour from the employment?
An employee making a minor deviation from his employer’s business for his own purposes is still within the scope of his employment.
If the deviation in time or geographic area is substantial, the employer is not liable.
Intentional torts by employees are not generally within scope of employment. What are the exceptions?
(1) Force is authorized in employment (bouncer).
(2) Friction is generated by the employment (bill collector).
(3) The employee is furthering the business of the employer (removing rowdy customers).
