Business Law 3 Flashcards
Definition of security
An investment of money to be managed by others with an expectation of profit, is probably a security.
Passive investors need legal protection more than investors who are actively involved in the enterprise and their investments are more likely to be deemed securities.
A transaction involving an investment purpose is more likely to create a security than a transaction involving a purpose of consumption. (ex. loan to start a business vs. loan to buy a boat)
Investment contract elements:
Investment of money
In a common enterprise
With an expectation of profit
To be earned primarily by the actions of others
Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which of the following types of instruments is excluded from the definition of “securities”?
Certificates of deposit
Which of the following transactions is subject to registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933?
The 1933 Act applies to sales of securities, including stocks, bonds and notes that are issued for periods over nine months.
Which of the following is least likely to be considered a security under the Securities Act of 1933?
General partnership interests.
Which of the following statements concerning the prospectus required by the Securities Act of 1933 is correct?
The prospectus is a part of the registration statement.
When a common stock offering requires registration under the Securities Act of 1933,
The issuer would be acting unlawfully if it were to sell the common stock without providing the investor with a prospectus.
Under the Securities Act of 1933, which of the following statements is (are) correct regarding the purpose of registration?
The purpose of registration is to adequately and accurately disclose financial and other information upon which investors may determine the merits of securities.
The registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 are intended to provide information to the SEC to enable it to
Ensure that investors are provided with adequate information on which to base investment decisions.
Securities Act of 1933 process
- Files registration statement with SEC
- Distributes red herring prospectus and takes oral offers and limited written offers and places tomestone ad
- Registration statement deemed effective and sales can begin
Distribution players:
Issuer-Underwriter-Broker-Investor
Content of registration statements:
- Financial Statements audited by independent CPA
- Names of issuer, directors, officers, underwriters, etc.
- Risks
- Description of issuer’s business
- Description of security and intended use for proceeds
Shelf Registration
Allowing the largest 2,000 or so companies to file a single registration statement that would cover the securities they expected to sell during the next three years
Securities Offering Reform Program (SORP), the SEC expanded the “shelf registration” concept to what might be considered “company registration.”
WKSIs—pronounced “wicksees”
Well-known seasoned issuers, largest users, make up 30% of firms but 95% of firm’s assets listed on exchange
Free writing prospectus (FWP)
WKSIs are now allowed to use additional material (FWPs) at any time with few restrictions other than the material usually has to be filed with the SEC
Which of the following securities is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933?
Any security issued by a charity, railroad company, farmers’ co-operative, government, savings and loans, or bank or short term notes (maturing in less than 9 months) is exempt from registering under the 1933 Act.
Winslow, Inc. intends to make a $450,000 common-stock offering under Rule 504 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933. Winslow
May sell the stock to an unlimited number of investors.
Rule 504 does not set a limit on the overall number of investors. So long as a company’s total offerings for a year are under $1mn
Rationale for exemptions from registration under 1933:
- Small offerings-small threat to the public
- Private placement exemptions-Accredited investors (AIs) who can look out for themselves
- Intrastate offering- regulated by state
Rule 504 Section D
- Amount- Less than 1 million in 12 months
- Advertising- general solicitation not allowed
- Purchaser- can be sold to anyone
- Information requirements- none
- Filing requirements- Form D within 15 days of first sale
- Resale- securities held for 6 mo to 1 year
Rule 505 Section D
- Amount- Less than 5 million in 12 months
- Advertising- general solicitation not allowed unless selling to AIs
- Purchaser- any amount of AIs, 35 unaccredited investors
- Information requirements- none for AIs
- Filing requirements- Form D within 15 days of first sale
- Resale- securities held for 6 mo to 1 year
Cannot be used by investment companies or those in bad standing with SEC.
Rule 506 Section D
- Amount- no limit
- Advertising- general solicitation not allowed unless selling to AIs
- Purchaser- any amount of AIs, 35 unaccredited investors
- Information requirements- none for AIs
- Filing requirements- Form D within 15 days of first sale
- Resale- securities held for 6 mo to 1 year
Cannot be used by those in bad standing with SEC.
Regulation A
- Amount- 20 or 50 million in 12 months, depending on tier
- Advertising- allows “testing the waters” to see if there is sufficient interest
- Purchaser- unaccredited investor limited to 10% of income or net worth
- Information requirements- 2 years audited or unaudited F/S, depending on Tier
- Filing requirements- Form 1-A plus offering circular (2 years audited F/S for Tier 2)
- Resale- none
Rule 147 Intrastate Offering
- Amount- none
- Advertising- must remain in state
- Purchaser- must be in-state residents
- Information requirements- none
- Filing requirements- none
- Resale- only to other residents of state for 9 months
Must be organized and doing business in state with 80% of assets, revenue and proceeds in the state
Blue Sky Laws
State securities regulations to protect investors from securities fraud, superseded by many federal regulations
Sam is a multimillionaire. He invested $100,000 in Company A’s crowdfunded venture. Later that year, he wanted to invest in Company B’s crowdfunded venture. What is the largest amount Sam can invest in B’s offering?
$0
$100,000 is the most someone can invest in crowdfunded ventures during the course of a single year.
The JOBS Act allows general solicitation in a Reg D Rule 506 offering if the issuer takes “reasonable steps” to insure what?
That it sells only to accredited investors.
If it does not engage in general solicitation, the issuer can sell to up to 35 unaccredited investors under Reg. D.
The maximum amount that a firm can raise through crowdfunding in a single year is:
1 million
Under the JOBS Act, a foreign company cannot
Use the crowdfunding exemption.
JOBS Act of 2012
- Created a new category of firms called emerging growth companies (EGCs) that can go public via an initial public offering (IPO) yet avoid most of the burdens of being public for five years
- Encouraged “crowdfunding”
- Increased the Regulation A exemption’s ceiling from $5 million to $50 million
- Allowed firms doing private placements to engage in some general solicitation and advertising
- Changed the definition of a “public company” in order to allow firms to grow bigger before being forced to go public
Emerging Growth Companies (EGCs) benefits:
- Include only 2 years (instead of 3) of audited F/S in its IPO registration statement.
- Reduced disclosure requirements regarding their executives’ pay.
- Right to submit to the SEC a draft equity IPO registration statement for confidential review prior to a public filing.
- Exempt for five years from complying with:
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding the auditor attestation report of the company’s internal control over financial reporting
- New PCAOB rules requiring things like mandatory audit firm rotation - Allows more publicity regarding a company that is going public
Crowdfunding
Process by which entrepreneurs and business owners can use the Internet to raise capital
- Up to 1 million in 12 months
- Foreign companies cannot use
- Limited to $2000 or 5% of income $100,000 in income
- Invest through funding portal regulated by SEC
Private Company Flexibility and Growth Act
JOBS Act gives companies such as Facebook more control over when they go public by
(a) raising the shareholder count ceiling from 500 to a maximum of either 2,000 persons in total or 500 persons who are not “accredited investors,”
(b) excluding from the count investors who became shareholders through the issuer’s employee compensation plan and investors who bought through crowdfunding.
Under the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, a CPA may be liable to any purchaser of a security for certifying materially misstated financial statements that are included in the security’s registration statement.
Under Section 11, which of the following must be proven by a purchaser of the security?
The primary things that plaintiffs must show to win their Section 11 claim are:
- That there was a material misstatement in the registration statement on the effective date
- That they can trace their shares to that registration statement
- That they suffered damages.
Under which of the following Acts is Thorp most likely to prevail in a lawsuit against Ivor?
The key fact here is that Ivor did not know of the error. It acted negligently, but not with bad intent (scienter). Absent bad intent, there can be no fraud and therefore no liability under Section 10(b) of the 1934 Act, which is an anti-fraud statute. However, defendants who are merely negligent are liable for materially false statements in a defective registration statement pursuant to Section 11 of the 1933 Act.
Under Section 11, a CPA will not usually be liable to the purchaser.
If the CPA can prove due diligence.
It is for intentional or reckless misstatements that liability is imposed.
Which of the following facts will result in an offering of securities being exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933?
The sale or offer to sell the securities is made by a person other than an issuer, underwriter, or dealer.
What is the standard that must be established to prove a violation of the anti-fraud provisions of Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934?
Intentional misconduct
Courts hold that a defendant must act with scienter (intent) or “extreme recklessness” (which is similar to scienter) to be liable under 10b-5.
An accountant will be liable for damages under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 only if the plaintiff proves that
A plaintiff must generally show several things to win a Section 10(b) case. A CPA must have (1) intentionally or recklessly (2) made a misstatement of material fact or omitted a material fact (3) that was relied upon by the defendant.
Which defense must an accountant establish to be absolved from civil liability under Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for false or misleading statements made in reports or documents filed under the Act?
Good faith and lack of knowledge of the statement’s falsity
Which of the following might prevent a plaintiff investor from recovering from a defendant accountant in a Section 18(a) lawsuit?
- The document containing the false statement was not filed with the SEC.
- The plaintiff did not read the false document.
- The defendant established that it acted in good faith and did not know of the error in the document.
Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the 1934 Act
Apply to all securities, no matter how big or small the company is, whether it is registered or unregistered with the SEC, and whether an initial offering or secondary trading is involved.
Whereas the standard of liability under Section 11 is mere negligence (and the burden of proof is on the defendant), the standard of liability under Section 10(b) is scienter (bad intent) and the burden of proof is upon the plaintiff
What Plaintiffs Must Prove to Win a 10b-5 Claim
- False Statement or Omission of Material Fact
- Scienter- “Recklessness” is sufficiently similar to bad intent to satisfy the requirement. Mere negligence will not suffice.
- Reliance by plaintiff- not required if an omission, required if an active misrepresentation
- Causation- plaintiff must show that the false statements or omissions caused him to enter into the transaction