Business Associations Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Formation of Agency Relationship

A

ABC

Assent by both principal and agent
Behalf (agent will work on behalf of principal)
Control (subject to principal’s control)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Liability for Hiring IC

A

Inherently Dangerous Delegations Negate Health

Activity was inherently dangerous
Duty was non-delegable
P negligent in hiring IC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ratification

A

Martians Train Martians Against Extra-Terrestrials Capabilities

Material Terms (knowledge of)
Manifest Assent
Entire Transaction
Capacities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Independent Contractor Factors

A

Students Take P.E. Purely Because Coaches Create Champions

Skills
Tools and Facilities
Period of Employment
Purpose of business
Business owned by contractor
Characterization
Compensation (basis)
Custom
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Intentional Torts of Employees

A

Natural Incognito Police Association

Natural Incident of Employee’s Duties
Employee is Promoting the Employer’s business
Specifically authorized or ratified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Business Judgment Rule

A

I’ve Got Faith, Cheating is Risky Business

D&O must perform their duties in good faith with such care as an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances, in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Duty of Loyalty (Fiduciary Duty Owed)

A

CIrCUIT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Approving Interested Transaction (Statutory Safe Harbor)

A

Four Moles Dug Deeper Swiftly

Fair and reasonable to corp.
Material facts disclosed
Disinterested directors approve (majority)
Shareholder majority (disinterested) approves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Corporate Opportunity

A

Lonely Buffalo In Evergreen Forest

Line of Business
Interest or Expectancy
Financially Able to take opportunity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Derivative suit requirements

A

Shannon Demands Red Furniture

was SH at time of act
written Demand on board
Remains SH through pendency of suit
Fairly and adequately represent corp. interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fundamental corporate changes

A

Royal Navy Sinks Fast

Resolution by board
Notice
Majority disinterested SH approve
File changes with state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

10(b)(5)

A

Insane Clowns Murder Fluffy Squirrels Casually (Rough Day)

Interstate Commerce
Material Fact (fraudulent conduct) (reasonable investor would consider important when making investment decision)
Scienter
Causation
Reliance
Damages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

16(b)

A

I’ll take 2,000 Sex for $10M please Alex

2000 SH (500 non-accredited SH)
National Stock Exchange
$10M valuation
(Must be 10% owner both before and after purchase/sale)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Articles of Incorporation

A

No Sleep Available Anytime, Insomnia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Piercing the Corporate Veil

A

Alter Egos Feature in Capital Frauds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

De Facto Corporation

A

Greek Freak is Everyone’s Championship Player

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Ultra Vires Act

A

SHE CODS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Duty of Loyalty (Partnership)

A

All Penguins Ate Ice Cream

Account for Profits/Benefits
Don’t deal with partnership as Adverse Interest
don’t Compete with partnership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Nonfeasance Exceptions

A

Strange Roosters Caw Proudly Before Roosters Cock-a-doodle-doo

Special Relationship (parent child, common carriers)
Created Peril (by D)
undertaking for P's Benefit
D's actions created Reliance
Contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Attractive Nuisance

A

Apples Falling Inspire Isaac’s Enlightenment

Aware of (should be) dangerous condition
children Frequent (attracted) to vicinity
likely to cause Injury (not aware of risk)
(Inability to appreciate risk)
Expense of remedy < danger of risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Landlord Liability

A

CLAPS

Common Areas
Latent Defects
Assumed Repairs (negligently made)
Public Use
Short-Term lease of Furnished Dwelling (any defective condition)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Res Ipsa Loquitur

A

Tuna Sole Carp Casserole

Typical injury
Sole Control of instrumentality (caused by D)
p not Contributorily negligent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Privacy Torts

A

Commercial Seaman Die First

Commercial appropriation
intrusion upon Seclusion
public Disclosure of private true facts
portrayal in False light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Strict Products Liability

A

Commercials Depict Children’s Creative Dioramas

Commercial Supplier
Defective when left D’s control
Causation (actual and proximate)
Damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Design Defect

A

USA LOAF
FAT RUT

Usefulness/desirability of product
Safer Alternative design availability
Dangers of product identified by time of trial
Likelihood and probable seriousness of injury
Obviousness / public expectation of danger
Avoidability of injury by care in use of product
Feasibility of eliminating danger without seriously impairing products function or making Unduly expensive

Feasible alternative test: product could have been made safe w/o serious impact on price/utility
Risk-utility test: danger of design > utility to society, feasibility of alternative designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Slander per se

A

Trade Talk Daily Chatter

P’s trade
moral Turpitude
loathsome Disease
lack of Chastity for women

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Defamation

A

Deer Proudly Proffer Delicious Recipes
Public Figures False Feign Kindness, Rats

Defamatory statement
concerning Plaintiff
Publication
Damage to Reputation

Public Figure
Falsity
Fault
Knowing or Reckless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Misrepresentation/Fraud

A

Miniature Market Fears Robots, Jaws, and Dinosaurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Malicious Prosecution

A

Pokemon Catcher Peter Parker Masters Discipline

no Probable Cause
no Proper Purpose
prevailed on Merits
suffered Damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Exploitation of Natural Resources (Voluntary Waste)

A

PURGE

Prior Use of land for exploitation before grant
Repair or maintenance of land
express/implied Grant to exploit
suitable only for Exploitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Joint Tenancy

A
4 Unities (T-TIP)
Time
Title 
Interest
Possession
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Adverse Possession (Prescription)

A

COACHES

Continuous
Open and notorious
ACtual possession
Hostile
Exclusive
Statutory Period

Easement by Prescription (COAHS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Fixtures (factors)

A

Nunchucks Attach Damage Against Evil Pirates

Nature of Item
Manner of Attachment
Amount of Damage
Appropriateness of use with property
Permanence of T's interest in property
Purchaser Expect fixture as part of property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Zoning Ordinances (Validity)

A

Zoning With Restrictive Diagrams

Reasonably Related to Public Welfare
Not Too Restrictive
Not Discriminatory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Easement Creation

A

PING

Prescription
Implication
Necessity
express Grant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Termination of Easement

A

END CRAMPS

Estoppel
Necessity (cessation of)
Destruction (involuntary)
Condemnation
Release
Abandonment
Merger
Prescription
Stated conditions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Covenant (burden) to run

A

WITH N

Writing
Intent
Touch & concern land
Horizontal and vertical privity
Notice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Covenant (benefit) to run

A

WIT V

Writing
Intent
Touch and concern
Vertical privity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Valid Conveyance of Deed

A

Weird Delivery Address

Writing satisfying SOF (intent) (reasonably identify parties and land)
Valid delivery
Acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Constructive Eviction

A

Loving Bull Shit Does Not Reveal Valor

Landlord breaches
Substantial and materially deprives tenant of use and enjoyment of property
provide LL with Notice and Reasonable time to Repair
Vacates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Future Covenants (Deed)

A

Quiet Enemies Wait For Assholes

Quiet enjoyment (promise grantee won't be disturbed by lawful claims of title)
Warranty (promise to defend from reasonable claims of title and compensate for losses from superior claims)
Future Assurances (promise to take reasonable steps to perfect defects in title)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Present Covenants (Deed)

A

Sex Only Creates Angry Enemies

Seisin (ownership)
right to Convey (had right as valid owner)
Against Encumbrances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Notice

A

Kit Is Reckless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Public Nuisance

A

Ur Health Service Provider will C U now

Unreasonable interference
Health, Safety, or Property rights
of Community
Unique damage to recover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Takings

A

Total taking

1) Physical appropriation = almost always a taking
2) Regulatory taking. Deprive all economic value? = Physical appropriation

Partial taking
Mere decrease in value not a taking if they leave economically viable use for property

Bears Eat Insects Bears Insects Eat
Balance Economic Impact (of regulation) with investment-backed expectations of claimant

Just compensation = fair market value at time of taking, including any improvements
No requirement to provide relocation costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Use Variance

A

Hot Hawaiian Fiesta

Hardship w/o ordinance
Variance will not damage or harm neighborhood
Not at Fault or bad actor in request

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Pre-Marital Agreements

A

Volunteers Unconsciously Disclose Whereabouts of 7 Convicted Rats

Voluntary
not Unconscionable 
full Disclosure of assets and information to other side
(unless Waiver)
7 days for outside Counsel Review
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Transmutation

A

Consider Not Requiring Signature Declaring Canada Official

Consideration Not Required
Signed by party to be adversely affected
express Declaration of Change of Ownership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Improvements of CP by SP

A

DIP

right to reimbursement for contributions to….
Down payment
Improvements
Principal of mortgage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Education Reimbursement

A

Super Bowl 10, Cowboys Felt Embarrassed at Loss to Superior Steelers

community Substantially Benefitted (presumed after 10 years)
also received Community-Funded Education
Lessens need for Spousal Support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Trust Formation

A

SPIRiT BF

```
Settlor
Purpose
Intent
Res (property
I)
Trustee
Beneficiary
Formalities
~~~

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Support Trust

A

HEMS

Health, Education, Maintenance, Support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Co-Trustee Liability

A

rANCID

Approve, participate, or conceal a breach of trust
Negligently enable a breach
fail to reasonably Correct breaches;
Improperly Delegate administration of trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Formal Attested Will

A

2 Douglas William Crandell, I Love U

2 Disinterested Witnesses
Writing
Capacity (18, sound mind, know bounty)
present testamentary Intent
signed during testator's Lifetime
Understanding that witnessing will
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Holographic Will or Codicil

A

Interesting Card, Holographic Seal

Intent (for document to be a will)
Capacity (18 years old and sound mind)
Handwrite material provisions
Sign (witnesses not required)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

Incorporation by Reference

A

Every Idiot Does Poorly

Document was in existence at time of will creation
Intended document to be incorporated
Defined in the will
Proven to be the document described

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Undue Influence

A

In Every Oven Burns Fire

Influence Exerted (opportunity to do so)
Overpowered mind and free will of testator
But For influence there would have been a different disposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

Undue Influence Factors

A

Opportunity Supplies Perfectly Voluptuous Ukrainians

Opportunity to exert influence
Susceptibility to influence due to age/physical condition
beneficiary active in Procuring will
Variance in expressed intentions
will provisions are Unnatural
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

Presumption of Undue Influence (common law)

A

Cowardly Russians Attack Ukraine

Confidential Relationship
Active in helping draft/procure will
Unnatural result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

California Statutory Undue Influence

A

Dogs Chase Cats Frequently

Donative transfer to

1) person who Drafted will
2) Care custodian of dependent adult (does not apply if had prior relationship before being custodian, e.g. child)
3) Fiduciary relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

Pretermitted Child

A

Internet Service Provider

Intentional omission
Substitute transfer intended to replace provision in will
Provision of nearly all of estate to parent of omitted child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

Spendthrift Exceptions

A

Tasty Steak Nuggets, Garlic Fries, Sold Inside

Tort judgment creditors
Support for beneficiary
Creditors supplying Necessities
Gov’t
Felony victim committed by beneficiary to extent equitable and reasonable
Settlor is beneficiary, spendthrift is Invalid

63
Q

Right to Speedy Trial (6th Amendment) Factors

A

LRAP

Length of delay
Reason for delay
Asserted right
Prejudice to D

64
Q

Malice Aforethought

A

If Ken Stabs Barbie, Run, Don’t Dial Home For Murder

Intent to Kill
Substantial Bodily Injury
Reckless Disregard for human life (Depraved Heart)
Felony Murder

1st Degree – premeditated and deliberate

65
Q

Voluntary Manslaughter

A

Professional Robot CONference

adequate Provocation
Reasonable person would be provoked
No time to Cool Off
did Not cool off

66
Q

Insanity Defenses

A

MN - Quality MidWest (Can’t understand quality or nature of actions or that actions are wrong)
MPC – Criminals Conduct Cornets and Lutes (can’t appreciate criminality of conduct or conform to law)
In Italy, Conforming Artists Lose (irresistible impulse – can’t control conduct due to mental defect)
Durham – Duke Medical (but for mental defect unlawful act would not have been committed)

67
Q

Forgery

A

CAlifornia Life Savers Free Dive

Creation/Alteration
document of Legal Significance
so that it is False
intent to Defraud

68
Q

Kidnapping

A

U Can’t Win Min, Ha!

Unlawful
Confinement
against person’s Will
by Moving/Hiding (secret place)

General intent crime

69
Q

Self-Defense

A

Without Faith, Unicorns Fade, Total Death

Without Fault
Confronted by Unlawful Force
Reasonably believe Threatened with imminent Death or great bodily harm

70
Q

Confrontation Clause

A

Terrible Undercooked Chicken

Testimonial
Unavailable
Cross-examination

71
Q

Breach of Warranty of Habitability

A

Mexican Trains Run on Rail Roads Daily

Move and Terminate lease
Reduce rent
Repair and deduct
Remain and sue for Damages

72
Q

Plain View Exception

A

Luxurious Ducks Prefer Potato Chips

1) Lawfully present officer
2) Discover evidence of crime in plain view
3) Probable cause to believe item is evidence of crime or contraband

73
Q

Custody

A

Fast Old Men Inherit Children’s Playthings

Freedom of Movement
Inherently Coercive Pressures (station house questioning)

74
Q

Co-defendant’s Confession

A

ECROC

Elizabeth’s Corgis Romp Over Countryside

Eliminate all references to other D
Subject to Cross-Examination
Used to rebut claim that confession obtained coercively

75
Q

Warrant Exceptions

A

A… A SPEEECH

Arrest
Automobile Exception
Stop and Frisk
Plain View
Exigent Circumstances/Evanescent Evidence/Emergency Aid
Consent
Hot Pursuit
76
Q

Abnormally Dangerous Activity

A

ScRUM

1) Substantial risk of bodily harm or death
2) Uncommon to the area
3) cannot be mitigated by sufficient care

77
Q

Prop 8

A

Even Brainiacs Host Rowdy Phish Parties

Exclusionary Rule
Best Evidence Rule
Hearsay
Rape Shield
Privilege
Prosecutorial Limits on Character Evidence
78
Q

Legal Relevance

A

People Can Make Daily Changes Within

unfair Prejudice
Confusion of Issues
Misleading the jury
undue Delay
Cumulative presentation of evidence
Waste of Time
79
Q

Statement Against Interest

A

3PI KA chU

against Penal, Pecuniary, or Proprietary Interest (social interest CA)
personal Knowledge of facts
Aware against interest and no motive to misrepresent
Unavailable

80
Q

Recorded Recollection

A

Kawen Makes Angry Faces At Insults

personal Knowledge at one time of facts in writing
Made/Adopted (by the witness)
made when Fresh in mind
Accurate
Insufficient recollection to testify fully and accurately

81
Q

Non-character Purposes for Evidence

A

MIMIC

Motive
Intent
Mistake (absence of)
Identity
Common plan/scheme
82
Q

Business Records

A

Crispy Rice Krispie Treats

Made at Time of occurrence with Knowledge (of either the recorder or someone with a business duty to transmit matters to the recorder)
Regularly conducted activity
testimony of Custodian

83
Q

Unavailability

A

Four Ants Devour Hand Pies Proficiently

Former Testimony
Statements Against Interest
Dying Declaration
Personal or Family History
Party Procuring Declarant's Unavailability (intentionally)
Physical Threat/Harm
84
Q

Public Records

A

STADIA

1) records made within Scope of duty
2) at Time of event
3) Activities of office/agency
4) matters observed pursuant to Duty
5) Investigation by Authority (factual findings – only in civil cases or FRE if used against gov’t in criminal cases)

85
Q

Expert Witnesses

A

SQCR

Some Quokkas Care Reliably

Specialized Knowledge helpful to jury
Qualified as an expert
Reasonable certainty regarding opinion
Testimony based on proper facts/Reliable methods

86
Q

Expert Witness Reliability Factors

A

General Atomics Peers Publish Low Error Rate

Generally accepted in relevant scientific community
Peer reviewed
Published
Low Error Rare

87
Q

Leading Question

A

1) Questions used to elicit preliminary or introductory matter
2) Witness has loss of memory
3) Cases in which witness is hostile or an adverse party

88
Q

Expert Witness Basis of Opinion

A

OERR

Oscar Elbows Rowdy Rita

Facts witness knows from Own experience/observation
Facts presented in evidence at trial
Facts not in evidence reasonably relied upon by experts in the field

89
Q

Lay Opinion

A

Rotating Pizza HUT

Rationally based on perception of witness
Helpful to a clear understanding of his testimony or a material fact
Not based on scientific or otherwise technical/specialized knowledge

90
Q

Authentication of voice

A

Witness recognizes voice
Speaker has knowledge of certain facts only a particular person would have
Speaker has identified self

91
Q

Threat of Physical Harm (CA)

A

1) Made at or near time of infliction or threat
2) circumstances indicate trustworthiness
3) in writing, or made to law enforcement or medical personnel

92
Q

Exclusionary Rule

A

Is a Song of Ice and Goddamn Fire Written Down?

Independent Source
Inevitable Discovery
Good Faith Warrant Defective

93
Q

Standing

A

Indy Car Racing

Injury in fact
Causation by D
Redressability

94
Q

Organizational Standing

A

Indianapolis Motor Speedway Patrol

Individual Participation not required
Members have Standing
Purpose (germane)

95
Q

Commerce Clause

A

CHAISE

Channels of Interstate Commerce
Instrumentalities of Interstate Commerce
Substantial Effect (non-economic activities)

96
Q

Dormant Commerce Clause

A

Nine Normal Dinos Make Pizza TGiF
Dinos Need Internal Self Introspection
Normal Dinos Uphold Unusual Bids

Noneconomic NonDiscriminatory alternatives (to achieve important state interest)
Market Participant
Traditional gov’t function

Laws that discriminate against interstate commerce violate DCC unless necessary to achieve an important state interest
State laws that do not discriminate will be upheld unless they unduly burden interstate commerce (balance legitimate/nondiscriminatory state interest vs. burden on IC)

97
Q

Obscenity

A

Platypuses do LAPS with Patented fiNS

Prurient interest
Lack of literary, artistic, political, or scientific value
Patently offensive
National standard

98
Q

Establishment Clause

A

Excessive SPrAIN
(SEX)

Sect preference? Strict scrutiny

Excessive Entanglement
Secular Purpose
Primary intention neither advance nor inhibit religion

99
Q

Preemption

A

Editor In Chief

Exclusive (conflict – mutually exclusive preemption)
Impedes (object preemption – interferes with objective)
Clear intent to preempt (field preemption) (health, safety, welfare)

100
Q

Time, Place, Manner Restrictions

Public Forum/Designated Public Forum

A

Coming Now No Teams In Atlantic Coast Conference

Content Neutral
Narrowly Tailored for Important gov’t interest
Alternative channels of communication

CN = subject matter neutral & viewpoint neutral
If not CN: strict scrutiny

Limited Public Forums/Non-public forums:
TPM regulations must be Viewpoint neutral + reasonably related to a legitimate gov’t purpose

101
Q

Commercial Speech

A

Loud Ass Mother Fuckin’: SAINT

Lawful Activity / Misrepresentation fraud
Substantial gov’t interest
Advances the interest
Narrowly tailored

102
Q

Taxing and Spending Clause

A

CPU

Clear (condition on grant)
condition relates to Purpose of spending program
not unduly coercive

103
Q

Procedural Due Process

A

Important Individual’s Interests Always Plague Gov’t

Deprivation of life, liberty, or property right (freedom secured by Constitution or statute) or (entitlement to continued receipt of gov’t benefit)

Importance of Interest to Individual
Ability of Additional Procedures to increase accuracy of fact-finding, and
Gov’t’s Interest

104
Q

Substantive Due Process

A

Fundamental right? Strict scrutiny (narrowly tailored to achieve compelling gov’t interest). No less restrictive means available.

Other rights – rational basis. If arbitrary, violates due process

105
Q

Equal Protection Clause

A

Fundamental interest (1st A, travel, voting)? Strict scrutiny

Classification (suspect/quasi-suspect):
If does not discriminate on its face or expressly, must prove: 1) discriminatory effect and 2) discriminatory intent
Gender (exceedingly persuasive justification)

106
Q

Free Exercise Clause

A

GBSGA

Gay Badgers Sometimes Get Arrested

Genuine Belief (court prohibited from determining -- SC never found nonreligious) (parallel to orthodox religious beliefs)
Sincerely Held
Generally applicable (targeting religious conduct)
If not generally applicable and motivated to interfere with religion > strict scrutiny (least restrictive means)
107
Q

Freedom of Association

A

UAPA

United American Panda Association

May not punish for joining unless individual knows)

1) Unlawful purpose or association
2) Individual actively participates
3) Individual intends to advance illegal purpose

108
Q

Privileges & immunities clause (IV and 14)

A

State laws that deny out-of-state persons privileges and immunities accorded to in-state persons violate the provision
(With regard to civil liberties or important economic activities – not hobbies)

Gov’t can show nonresidents are at least part of the problem the gov’t is attempting to solve and there are no less restrictive means

If law does not discriminate – no problem
Does not apply to corporations and aliens

109
Q

Res Judicata (Claim Preclusion)

A

For Shit’s Sake

1) Final judgment on the merits
2) same parties (same configuration)
3) same claims (cause of action)

110
Q

Collateral Estoppel (Issue Preclusion)

A

Some Asians Eat Japanese Mexican Food

1) Same issue of fact
2) Actually litigated and decided
3) Essential to the judgment
4) Judgment on the merits (not default or consent judgment)
5) Fair (non-mutual issue preclusion)

Defensive (non-mutual): new non-party D can assert prior judgment
Offensive (new P not party to 1st suit v D)
Fairness factors: P had opportunity to have easily joined first suit; D had incentive to litigate first suit; prior judgments inconsistent; procedural opportunities not available to D in first suit

111
Q

Legal Remedies (Tort) – Compensatory

A

Casual Foreplay Certainly Unavoidable

Causation Foreseeability Certainty, Unavoidable (Mitigation)

112
Q

Specific Performance

A

Volunteers Prepare Infants For Expected Delivery

Valid contract
Performed or prepared to do so
Inadequate legal remedies (unable to secure substitute goods)
Feasibility of enforcement
Defenses (hardship, etc.)

(Sale of land to BFP cuts off specific performance

113
Q

TRO/Preliminary Injunction

A

Indiana Basketball Premier League Success

Irreparable injury
Balance of hardships (unless willful)
Public interest favors granting
Likelihood of success on the merits

Maintain status quo until regular hearing can be held
May be granted without notice if strong showing as to why

114
Q

Permanent Injunction

A

Indiana Pacers Follow Basketball Drills

Inadequate legal remedy (e.g. continuing wrong)
Protectable property right
Feasibility of enforcement
Balance of hardships
Defenses
115
Q

Defenses (Equitable Remedies)

A

ULUrU Has Every Feature Coveted

Unclean Hands
Laches
Undue Hardship/Unfairness
Equitable estoppel
Free speech
Crime (except if public nuisance)
116
Q

Constructive Trust

A

Downright Terrible Web User Interface

D has title to property
Through Wrongdoing of D
retention = Unjust enrichment
Inadequate legal remedy (insolvency sufficient)

No deficiency judgment allowed after imposition of constructive trust
Cut off by transfer to BFP

Equitable lien on lowest intermediate balance unless show D expressly intended the subsequent addition as restitution of P’s funds

117
Q

Grounds for Rescission/Reformation

A

Mistake (Mutual or Unilateral)
Misrepresentation (Innocent/Fraudulent).

Sue for rescission before asserting damages. Claim for damages affirms K.

118
Q

Undue Hardship

A

Inadequacy of Consideration, Marked Inequality Between Parties, and Unfair Advantage Exercised by the Plaintiff

119
Q

Indispensable Party

A

1) Without can’t grant complete relief
2) Interests will be impaired if proceed without
3) will not destroy diversity (if so either dismiss or proceed without party)
Consider prejudice; alternative forum; chance of inconsistent judgments

120
Q

Interlocutory Appeals Act

A

1) Trial judge certifies a controlling question of law on which there is a substantial difference of opinion resolution of which via appeal will materially advance termination of litigation
2) Court of appeals agrees

121
Q

Defenses to K Formation

A

Southern Miami Florida International Intelligence University

Statute of Frauds
Mistake/Ambiguity
Illegality
Incapacity
Unconscionability
Fraud (misrepresentation), Duress
122
Q

Discharge of Duty (K)

A

Iguanas Frustrated Modify Repair Nuclear Accords

Impossibility, Impracticability
Frustration of Purpose
Modification
Mutual rescission
Novation
Accord & satisfaction
123
Q

Contract Remedies

A

Clearance Creedwater Revival Rates Robust Songs

Compensatory Damages
Consequential Damages
Restitution
Rescission or Reformation
Specific Performance
124
Q

Mutual mistake

A

Mistake concerns basic assumption on which contract was made (essential element – parties, subject matter, consideration, offer and acceptance)
Mistake has material effect
party seeking avoidance did not assume risk

Unilateral mistake: mistake had material effect and mistaken party did not bear risk. Nonmistaken party did not know or have reason to know of mistake. Usually only computational errors.

125
Q

Parol Evidence Rule (admissions)

A

Evidence concerning validity (formation defects, conditions precedent) (not performance)
Evidence used to interpret ambiguities
Evidence showing true consideration paid
Evidence in action for reformation

126
Q

Anticipatory Repudiation

A

1) Executory bilateral contract (actions remain undone on both sides)
2) Unequivocal statement of nonperformance
3) Nonrepudiating party may:
a) sue immediately
b) suspend performance and sue when performance due
c) Treat repudiation as rescission
d) Urge performance

127
Q

Contract (Offer)

A

Intent to make offer
Certain and definite terms
Communicated to offeree

128
Q

Material Breach

A

Not received substantial benefit of bargain.

May sue immediately

129
Q

Land Sale K

A

Description of Land, Parties, and Price

K for services: nature of services and duration (no extrinsic evidence)

130
Q

Estoppel (K)

A

D’s conduct or promise foreseeably induces P to change position in reliance on oral agreement, may remove K from SoF

131
Q

Impossibility/Impracticability

Frustration of Purpose

A

Impossible (impossible for any one to perform)

1) Nonoccurence of event was basic assumption of parties
2) Neither party expressly assumed risk
3) contractual duties may be discharged if performance becomes impossible or impracticable

Impracticability – party has encountered extreme and unreasonable difficulty and/or expense and nonoccurrence of condition was basic assumption of the parties. Mere increase in costs usually insufficient.

FOP: 1) purpose of K becomes valueless due to supervening event not the fault of party seeking discharge. 2) Must not have reasonably foreseen the supervening event.

132
Q

Replevin

A
Goods identified (specifically) in contract
After reasonable effort unable to secure adequate substitute or such effort would be unavailing

or If partial payment or purchased for personal, family, or household purposes

Not a remedy when no guarantee sheriff can recover
Available at commencement of action and before trial if a pre-seizure judicial hearing is held

133
Q

Material vs. Minor Breach

A

Look at breach of particular provision but also totality of deviations

Extent to which nonbreaching party will receive benefit he expected
Extent to which nonbreaching party can be compensated in damages
Hardship to breaching party if K is terminated
Extent to which negligent or willful
Extent to which breaching party has performed and likelihood of full performance

134
Q

Encroachment

A

1) Legal remedy inadequate (land unique). Consider ejectment
2) Balance of hardships

3) Continuing trespass - damages = rental value of occupied land
Permanent trespass – damages are market value of land occupied by structure

135
Q

Conversion

A

1) act by D that interferes with P’s right of possession in chattel
2) serious enough to warrant paying full value
3) intent to perform the act bringing about the interference
4) causation

FMV at time of conversion

Trespass to land: reasonable value of use of land

BFP can be liable for conversion if obtains from thief (no title to give)

136
Q

Equitable lien

A

DTUI

Downtown Taxis Under Influence

D misappropriated P’s property
P’s property can be Traced to property held by D
Retention = unjust enrichment
Legal remedy is inadequate

Appropriate where value decrease. Priority over unsecured creditors
Cut off by transfer to BFP

137
Q

Restitution

A

Conferred benefit on D
With Reasonable expectation of being compensated for value
D knew or had reason to know of P’s expectation
D would be unjustly enriched

138
Q

Duty of Competence/Diligence (CA)

A

Icelandic Rangers Gaze at Norse Ruins

Intentionally
Recklessly
Gross Negligence
Repeatedly

139
Q

Conflict of Interest

A

Delta Airlines: So Many Layovers
Rascally Pirate Witness
Revolve Babies In Communion Wine

Directly Adverse. Substantial Material Limitation
Related to Party or Witness (CA - disclose even if no material limitation)
Reasonable Belief carry on Rep (Informed consent in Writing)

140
Q

Business Transaction with Client

A

For Reasons Due to Water, Soccer Club is Closed

Fair and Reasonable Terms
Disclosed in Writing
Seek Counsel
Informed Consent (in writing)

141
Q

Fee Reasonableness

A

DiRECT

Difficulty (and novelty of) Issues
Relationship (nature of)
Experience
Contingency
Time limitations
142
Q

3rd Party Compensation

A

Capable Rabbits Capture Carrots In Western China

can’t Control Representation (retain independent judgment)
Confidential communications preserved
Informed written consent

143
Q

Fee Splitting

A

A Well-Priced Racecar

client agrees in Writing
Proportional to work done by each lawyer
Reasonable fee

144
Q

Confidentiality Exceptions

A

(CA)D FUSE ICC

“Prevent Crime likely to result in Death/Serious Bodily harm CA
substantial Financial harm using lawyer’s services
Suit by Client
Ethics Advice
Informed Consent
Compelled by Court”

145
Q

Permissive Withdrawal

A

An (Amazing) Puffin Ubers Over a Diverse (Rain Forest)

“without material Adverse effect on client’s interests
(CA) client knowingly and freely assents
Persists in criminal or fraudulent action involving lawyer’s services
Used services to perpetrate crime or fraud
client fails to fulfill Obligation
unreasonably Difficult
Repugnant course of action
Unreasonable financial burden”

146
Q

Duty of Candor

A

Kill Fat Mother Fucking Feral Elk For Deer Cheerfulness

“Knowingly
False statement of Material Fact
offer False Evidence
Fail to Offer Disclosing controlling law”

147
Q

Supervisor

A

Orcas Really Fancy Rosé

“Orders misconduct
Ratifies misconduct
Fails to Remedy”

148
Q

Duty of Communication

A

Informed Dolphins Spend Days Reading Research

“Informed Decisions
Substantial Developments
Reasonable Requests for Information”

149
Q

Counsel as Witness

A

Ultra Light Single Serve Hamburger

“Uncontested matter
value of Legal Services
Substantial hardship on client (informed written consent CA)”

150
Q

Prosecutorial Duties

A

PCP Completely Ruins & Destroys Everything

"Probable cause to prosecute
Right to counsel
Refrain from extrajudicial comments
Disclose mitigating evidence
New evidence"
151
Q

Substantially Related

A

Same Dispute or Substantial Risk that Confidential Factual Info that would normally be obtained in prior rep would materially advance client’s position in subsequent matter

San Diego’s Starting Right Center Fielder

152
Q

Duty of Fairness to Opposing Party

A
Taco Diet I Eat
(Not to Tamper)
(Disclose Incriminating/Exculpatory evidence)
(Inadvertent Disclosures)
(Expedite Litigation)
153
Q

CA (Fee Agreement)

A

> $1,000 in writing unless

1) Corp
2) client waives in writing
3) same as previous services
4) emergency
5) impractical for other reasons

ABA &CA: contingency must be in writing