burglary section 9(1)(b) Flashcards
- D may be liable for…
D may be liable for burglary defined under Section 9(1)(b) of the Theft Act 1968 as when a person, having entered a building or part of a building as a trespasser, commits or
attempts to commit, theft or grievous bodily harm.
- The ACTUS REUS is…
The ACTUS REUS is the entry of a building or part of a building as a trespasser PLUS
committing or attempting to commit theft or GBH.
- There must be an…
There must be an effective entry, set out in Brown and in Ryan
- A Building requires…
Building requires permanence as in B and S v Leathley, and can be just part of the building
as in Walkington.
- S.9(4) states that…
S.9(4) states that it includes inhabited vehicles or vessels eg. caravans
and houseboat
- A trespasser is someone who…
A trespasser is someone who enters a building (or part of a building) without permission,
as in Collins.
It includes entering with permission then going beyond that permission, as in
Smith and Jones.
- Actus Reus: IF A THEFT / ATTEMPTED THEFT:…
Here theft was committed [or attempted] as under S.1 when D dishonestly appropriated
property belonging to another
[or attempted to] when he [eg. took/attempted to
take V’s purse].
- Actus Reus: IF GBH/ATTEMPTED GBH:….
IF GBH/ATTEMPTED GBH:
• Here GBH was committed [or attempted] as D caused serious harm to V (Smith,
Saunders) when he [eg. Broke V’s jaw by hitting him].
- The MENS REA is…
The MENS REA is intention or subjective recklessness as to entering as a trespasser, PLUS
the mens rea of theft or inflicting GBH.
Here [eg. D had direct/specific intention (Mohan – deciding to bring about a
consequence) OR subjective recklessness (Cunningham- foresaw a risk and carried
on regardless)
Specific: to enter V’s house as a trespasser as he deliberately climbed through
the window
Subjective: was not sure if he was allowed in but did it anyway].
- Mens Rea: IF THEFT / ATTEMPTED THEFT:
IF THEFT / ATTEMPTED THEFT:
The Mens Rea of theft under S.2 is that D must be DISHONEST. The 2 stage test established
in Ivey v Genting Casinos is used.
Firstly the jury must decide what was the actual
knowledge or belief of D as to the facts.
Secondly, in that context, the jury must decide
whether D’s behaviour would be regarded as dishonest by the reasonable, ordinary,
decent person.
- Also, under S.6…
Also, under S.6 there is an intent to permanently deprive by disposing of or treating the
property as his own (DPP v Lavender, Raphael, Lloyd) because [eg. D ran away with the
purse].
- Mens Rea: IF GBH / ATTEMPTED GBH:…
IF GBH / ATTEMPTED GBH:
• Here, there is the mens rea of inflicting GBH as D had direct intention or subjective
recklessness as to causing some harm (Mowatt, Savage, Parmenter), as defined
under S.20 of the Offences Against the Person Act when he [had direct intention
(decide to bring about a consequence) to cause some harm when he punched V
hard].