Burden and standard of proof - Syallabus area 11 Flashcards
what are the two principle kinds of burden?
the legal and evidential burden.
The legal burden is a burden of proof, i.e burden imposed on a party to prove facts or a fact in issue.
in some cases the legal burden in relation to some of the facts will be on one party, and the legal to another i.e If insanity is raised by the
what is the legal burden on the prosecution and where necessary defence?
Prosecution: beyond reasonable doubt
defence: balance of probabilities
the question whether legal burden has been discharged is decided by the tribunal of fact. jury or magistrates, after evidence has been presented
is the evidential burden a burden of proof?
no it is not. It is the burden of adducing evidence or ‘the duty of passing the judge’
it is the duty imposed on a party to adduce sufficient evidence on a fact or facts in issue to satisfy the judge that the issue should be left to be decided by the tribunal of fact
in some cases the evidential burden will be on one party and the evidential on another. true or false?
true. such as in case of self-defence, defendant has evidential burden while the legal burden is on prosecution.
if there is no sufficient evidence before the jury to conclude that defence is established, the issue will be withdrawn from them. it will not amount to be a breach of ECHR article 6
what happens when evidential burden on a particular issue is borne by the prosecution?
it is discharged by the addution of sufficient evidence to justify as a possibility a finding by the tribunal of fact that the legal issue has been discharged
what happens when prosecution bears the legal and evidential burden?
If they discharge evidential burden, It does not mean they will succeed as it goes to the jury to decide. However, if they fail to discharge the evidential burden, they will fail on the issue as it will be withdrawn from jury. This may cause a submission of no case to answer
if accused bears the evidential and legal burden, what happens?
In insanity evidential burden is discharged by adducing evidence to satisfy the jury on the balance of probabilities.
If they bear the evidential burden like self-defence, it is discharged by adducing evidence which might leave a jury in reasonable doubt.
Accused always bears burden on balance of probability
3 exceptions to where prosecution bear legal burden of proving elements of the offence?
insanity
express statutory exceptions
implied statutory exceptions
if the accused is charged with murder and raises insanity or diminished responsibility, what happens?
the court shall allow prosecution to adduce evidence to prove other issues.
if the accused alleges to be under a disability which makes them unfit to plead and stand on trial on indictment, the issue may be raised by prosecution or defence.
if prosecution contend the accused is under a disability and defence disputes it, the prosecution must prove it
if defence contend the disability and prosecution disputes it, defence proves it
statute may cast on the accused the burden of proving certain issues. true or false?
True. the legal burden of the other issues will remain with prosecution
if possession in a public place is proved, who bears the onus?
defence. if it involved an article not made for use for causing injury to the person, prosecution must prove it was carried with intention to cause injury
any reverse onus is open to challenge on the basis of incompatibility with the ECHR, Art 6. true or false?
true. but it will not inevitably give rise to a finding of incompatibility - F3.18
Who generally bears the legal and evidential burden?
prosecution
where defence bears legal burden of proving insanity or by express or implied statutory exception, some other issue, they also bear evidential burden. True or false?
true
in self-defence once there is sufficient evidence to leave the issue before the jury, prosecution bears the burden. true or false
true. the question where there is sufficient evidence to leave before the jury is a question for the trial judge to answer by applying common sense to the evidence. when there is sufficient evidence to raise a prima facie case, it is left to the jury