Brosius Flashcards
L(x)
(Least Squares estimate)
L(x) = a + bx
where
b= (avg(xy) - avg(x)avg(y)) / (avg(x2) - avg(x)2)
and
a = avg(y) - b * avg(x)
Parameter Estimation errors
Signifcant changes in nature of loss experience and sampling error can lead to values of a and b that do not reflect reality
When a<0, our estimate of y will be negative for small values of x (use link ratio method)
When b<0, our estimate of y decreases as x increases (use budgeted loss method)
Q(x)
total number of claims
E[Y| X = x]
R(x)
expected number of claims outstanding
E[Y-X|X=x] = Q(x) - x
General Poisson-binomial case
u= mean
d = probability of any given claim being reported by year end
Q(x) = x + u(1-d)
R(x) = u(1-d)
R(x) does not depend upon number of claims already reported, so B-F estimate is optimal
Negative Binomial- Binomial case
with parameters (r,p) and d
R(x) = [(1-d)(1-p)/ 1 - (1-d)(1-p)] (x+r)
increasing linear function of x, budgeted loss, B-F, and link ratio method not optimal
Fixed Prior Case
Y is not random; there is some value k such that Y is sure to equal k
Q(x) = k
R(x) = k-x
corresponds to budgeted loss method
Fixed reporting case
there is a number d such that the percentage of claims reported by year end is always d
Q(x) = x/d
R(x) = x/d - x
Corresponds to link ratio method
Advantages of best linear approximation of Q over Bayesian estimate
difficult to compute a pure Bayesian estimate since it requires knowledge of the loss and loss reporting processes
best linear approximation is:
- simpler to compute
- easier to understand and explain
- less dependent upon the underlying distribution
Best linear approximation to Q (L(x))
L(x) = (x - E[X]) (Cov(X,Y)/Var(X)) + E[Y]
Cov(X,Y)<var>
</var>
a large reported amount should lead to a decrease in the reserve (budgeted loss method)
Cov(X,Y) = Var(X)
a large reported amount should not affect the reserve (B-F Method)
Cov(X,Y) > Var(X)
a large reported amount should lead to an increase in the reserve (link ratio method)
When least squares development is appropriate
- does not make sense if year to year changes in loss experience are due largely to systematic shifts or distortions in the book of business
- the least squares fit may be appropriate if year to year changes are due largely to random chance
Data adjustments before applying least squares method
- Incurred loss data - correct for inflation by putting the years on a constant-dollar basis before fitting a line
- If the business expands, divide each year’s losses by an exposure base to eliminate distortion