Brosius Flashcards
Brosius introduces the Least Squares method for estimating loss reserves and compares this method to the traditional Chain Ladder and the Budgeted Loss (Expected Loss) methods. The key theme of this paper is that the Least Squares method is a credibility weighting of the Link Ratio (Chain Ladder) and Budgeted Loss methods.
When should you use the least squares method
Whenever random year-to-year fluctuations in loss experience are significant - aka changes are largely due to random chance
Does not make sense if there are systematic shifts or distortions to the book of business
Link Ratio Method
L(x) = cx
where L(x) is the estimate of y (losses at future eval) and c is the volume weighted average CDF
fits a line through the origin with a slope equal to the selected link ratio
Budgeted Loss Method
L(x) = k
where k is a constant
Used when there are extreme fluctuations in losses or past data is not available
Brosisus assumes k is chosen by averaging y over several years
fits a horizontal line equal to the average of y
Least Squares Method
L(x) = a + bx
Estimated y by fitting a line to the points (x,y) that minimizes the sum of the squares of the residuals
Use LINEST(y,x) in Excel -> output is (b,a)
Special Cases of LS
a = 0 -> Link Ratio Method
b = 0 -> Budgeted Loss Method
b = 1 -> BF Method
Parameter Estimation Errors
Significant changes in the nature of the loss experience and sampling error can lead to values of a and b that do not reflect reality
- when a < 0, y is negative for small x and the Link Ratio method should be used
- when b < 0, y decreases as x increases and the Budgeted Loss method should be used
Hugh White’s Question
Question: You are trying to establish the reserve for commercial auto bodily injury and the reported proportion of expected losses as of the statement date for the current accident year period is 8% higher than it should be. Do you:
- Reduce the bulk reserve by a corresponding amount (Budgeted Loss method)
- Leave the bulk reserve at the same percentage level of expected losses (BF method)
- Increase the bulk reserve in proportion to the increase of actual reported over expected reported (Link Ratio method)
Systemic distortions
If the data can be adjusted, we can use the LS method:
- If studying incurred loss data, we can correct for inflation by putting the years on a constant-dollar basis before fitting a line
- If the business expands, we can divide each year’s losses by an exposure base to eliminate the distortion
Development Formula 1
Given random variables 𝑌 describing ultimate losses and 𝑋 describing reported losses, the best linear approximation to 𝑄 (pure Bayesian estimate) is as follows:
L(x) = (x - E(X)) * Cov(X,Y)/Var(X) + E(Y)
- If Cov(X,Y) < Var(X), a large reported amount should lead to a decrease in the reserve (Budgeted Loss method)
- If Cov(X,Y) = Var(X), a large reported amount should not affect the reserve (BF method)
- If Cov(X,Y) > Var(X), a large reported amount should lead to an increase in the reserve (Link Ratio method)
Expected Value of the Process Variance (EVPV)
E_Y[Var(X|Y)] = Var(X/Y) * (Var(Y) + E(Y)^2)
Represents the variability resulting from the loss reporting process
Variance of the Hypothetical Mean (VHM)
Var_Y[E(X|Y)] = E(X/Y)^2 * Var(Y)
Represents the variability resulting from the loss occurrence process
Development Formula 2
L(x) = Z * x/d + (1 - Z) * E(Y)
where Z = VHM / (VHM + EVPV)
L is a credibility weighting of Link Ratio estimate x/d and Budgeted Loss estimate E(Y)
LS Credibility Weighted Estimate
L(x) = Z * x/d + (1 - Z) * E(Y)
Z = bd = b/c
where c is the volume-weighted average CDF
If using LRs, c = Avg Ult LR / Avg Undeveloped LR
Best linear approximation to a pure Bayesian approach, so it has the optimal credibility weighting
LS Algorithm
Given cumulative reported/paid losses and EP:
- Divide the losses by EP to adjust for systematic changes if EP is increasing or decreasing over time
- Calculate ultimate LRs for years that are closest to ultimate using given tail factor
- Calculate the LS parameters and ensure there are no parameter estimation errors
- Calculate the next year’s ultimate LR using the LS parameters
- Re-run the LS parameter estimation including the previous year’s estimated ultimate LR
Caseload Effect
Since a claim is more likely to be reported quickly when the caseload is low, we expect the development ratio E(X|y)/y to be a decreasing function of y, not a constant
E(X|y) = dy + x_0
L(x) = Z * (x - x_0)/d + (1 - Z) * E(Y)
where Z = VHM / (VHM + EVPV)
Caseload Effect Algorithm
- Set up system of equations to solve for d and x_0
- Use formula to estimate the ultimate losses L(x)
Advantages of LS Method
- the ability to flex to other methods
- easy to implement and uses easily accessible data
- works well for developing losses for small states or lines that are subject to serious fluctuations
Disadvantages of LS Method
- can lead you astray if corrections are not made to account for significant exposure changes or other shifts in loss history
- is subject to sampling error since parameters are estimated from observed data
When is the Bayesian method appropriate?
- new LOB
- significant changes to the book of business and the go-forward experience will be different from historical
Advantages of using the best linear approximation as a replacement for the pure Bayesian estimate
- simpler to compute
- easier to understand and explain
- less dependent on the underlying distribution