Brief framework Flashcards

1
Q
  1. Intro pre Pearl Harbor
A

US neutrality (D)
Lend-lease (D)
Sanctions/ embargo on JAP (E)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. Intro post Pearl Harbor
A

Declaration of War: armed conflict on the competition continuum (D)
Strike back, but how? (M)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. Intro Conception/ Approval
A

To conduct a bombing raid on mainland Japan using USAAF B25 medium bombers launched from a USN aircraft carrier. approved by POTUS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. DIME Diplomatic
A

-strained relations US/JPN relations due to JAP aggression in pacific
-Failed following Pearl Harbor
-Lend lease with china/russia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. DIME Information
A

-Perception and propaganda
-Strong Japan, weak/vulnerable US
-US shifting narrative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. DIME Military
A

-Direct military intervention
-Strategic strike
-innovative approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  1. DIME Economic
A

sanctions and embargo on Japan oil and steel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  1. Ends (objectives)-
A

-Retaliate against Japan
-Boost US morale
-Demonstrate US resolve and capability following setback (I)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. Ways (methods)-
A

-Innovative military approach (M)
-Element of surprise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  1. Means (resources)-
A

-Joint operation with USAAF and USN
-Utilizing highly modified aircraft (B-25 was eventually chosen)
-Skilled personnel selected from 17th Bombardment Group (Meritocracy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. Risk
A

-High risk for crew safety and potential for escalation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. Risk: -Suitability-
A

Accomplishes the strategic objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  1. Risk: -Feasibility-
A

The bombing raid, yes. The crew’s safety, questionable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  1. Risk: -Acceptability-
A

Strategic benefit outweighed the tactical risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. Planning would require 2 things
A

operational art (creative solutions) and science (known tactics)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

BONUS Clausewitz trinity

A

Passion
Politics
Chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q
  1. Frame the OE (PIP)
A

PMESIIPT
POLITICAL- allianced, diplomatic relations in pacific, political willingness
INFORMATION- intelligence on targets, maintaining secrecy
PHYSICAL TERRAIN- Pacific distances, weather, ocean conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q
  1. Define the problem
A

How do we retaliate against Japan after Pearl Harbor to boost US morale and demonstrate US strength and resolve and ability to strike back while minimizing risk to crews and resources?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q
  1. Make assumptions (CEL)
A

-Capability to execute
-Element of Surprise
- minimal Japanese defense of homeland

20
Q
  1. Choose the operational approach, why?
A

JPP because of the missions Joint nature for complex multifaceted environments

21
Q
  1. LOOs (SNIL)
A

-Strategic bombing
-Naval operations
-Intelligence and recon
-Logistics and Sustainment

22
Q
  1. LOEs (SIM)
A

-Surprise and deception
-Interservice coordination
- morale and psychological effect

23
Q
  1. OBJs (BDD)
A
  • Boost US morale/ Demoralize JPN (Critical Requirement)
    -Demonstrate US resolve
    -Disrupt Japanese strategy (Critical Vulnerability due to over extension)
24
Q
  1. Limitations
A

-range
-payload

25
Q
  1. Constraints
A

-Secrecy and surprise
-limited targets due to limited aircraft

26
Q
  1. Restraints
A

-International military law (The Hague)
-Target military/industrial centers. Avoid civilian casualties, avoid cultural landmarks

27
Q
  1. Application to Joint Functions
A

All, but primarily:
-Fires: the bombing itself, achieving effects
-Intel: Gaining intel about the targets, weather and geography
-C2: Coordinating JTF, planning decision making

28
Q
  1. Aligned with principles of joint operations
A

All, but primarily:
-Surprise: The Japanese had no idea the raid was coming
-Economy of Force: utilizing only 16 aircraft to achieve strategic objectives (akin to modern SF)
-Unity of effort: Coordination under Doolittle

29
Q
  1. UNIFIED ACTION
A

to achieve unity of effort

30
Q
  1. Doolittle was selected for his reputation of…
A

-Highly respected aviator and military officer
-Experience in aviation and engineering knowledge
-Leadership, innovation, and ability to inspire

31
Q
  1. Meritocracy
A

Similar to Napoleon’s professional armies. Promotion/selection based on competencies and performance.

32
Q
  1. Organizational leader
A

Doolittle was a superb organizational leader
-Technical expert
-Interpersonal expert
-Conceptual expert

33
Q
  1. High EQ
A

Doolittle was
- self-aware
- self managed
- social skills

ALL CRITICAL IN HIGH STRESS SITUATIONS

34
Q
  1. POWER
A

Doolittle exerted firm and rational power, a combination of personal/soft and positional/hard power. Earned him high commitment20.

35
Q
  1. Established trust
A

Doolittle was an expert communicator. he empowered subordinates to operate through the commander’s intent. Created a positive climate among his crews.

36
Q
  1. Moltke
A

Similar to Moltkes AUFSTAGTAKTIC, an early form of decentralized command.

37
Q
  1. Possessed core leader attributes and competencies
A

Attributes:
- Presence
- Intellect
- Character

Competencies:
- Leads
- Achieves
- Develops

His leadership qualities helped to coordinate and plan at the operational and strategic levels.

38
Q
  1. Operational and strategic level planning
A

WH and military advisors down to the tactical level. Lends itself to the modern strategic policy and guidance.
-NSS to NDS to NMS to CCCP to CONPLAN

39
Q
  1. Western way of war
A
  • Reliance on superior technology
  • Challenge response dynamics (adaptation)
  • Inherently expensive (DEVELOPMENT AND PROCUREMENT)
40
Q
  1. Revolution in military affairs (RMA)
A
  • Significant in the evolution of military capabilities and tactics
  • Identified that the US had strategic reach through the use of joint capability
  • Unprecedented inter-service coordination
  • Change in methods, unprecedented mission/concept (INNOVATION)
41
Q
  1. SEGWAY TO FORCE MANAGEMENT
A

This innovation and RMA were likely due to creative force management

42
Q
  1. NEED, GAP
A
  • Need- Long-range bombers with adequate payload
  • GAP- Limited range and limited payload capacity current bombers
43
Q
  1. SOLUTION
A

SOLUTION:

O- Reorganization of Army/Navy air units to include long-range bombing techniques

M- Development and procurement of new long-range bombers, escorts, and bombing equipment

F- building and upgrading bases in the Pacific to support long-range bombing missions

44
Q
  1. Modern JUON (JOINT OPERATIONAL URGENT NEEDS STATEMENT)
A

Because of the urgent need and imminent risk to life and mission, a material solution would require the urgent operational needs path (JUONS) to be developed and procured in less than two years.

45
Q
  1. Result on changes
A

Expect change to:
- Doctrine
- Training
- New units
- New tools/ CL9 supply chain

46
Q
  1. Closing. Why is this relevant today?
A

Because the raid laid the foundation for the modern strategic bombing, part of the USAF Nuclear triad.

47
Q
  1. Tied to US core concepts and mission:
A

Concept: Global reach
Mission Global strike
ANYWHERE, ANYTIME