Bridge Designs: Fixed-fixed Vs Cantilever Flashcards
What is the optimum and acceptable crown root ratios?
Optimum = 2:3 Acceptable = 1:1
When would a crown-root ratio of less than 1:1 be acceptable?
If the opposing occlusion is composed of artificial teeth; denture or bridge
If the opposing teeth are periodontally compromised and mobile
Ideal root configuration for a FPD
Roots broader labiolingually than mesiodistally over roots which are round in cross section
Multirooted teeth with widely separated roots over converged or fused roots
Roots with apical curvature over straight and near perfect taper
When are double abutments used for FPDs
Unfavourable crown-root ratios of abutments
Long spans
Criterion for double abutments in FPDs
A secondary abutment must have at least as much root surface area and as favourable a crown-root ratio as the primary abutment.
Must be sufficient crown length and space between adjacent abutments to prevent impingement on the gingiva under the connector
What is a complication?
A secondary disease or condition developing in the course of a primary disease or condition
Goodacre, 2003. Most common single crown complications?
Need for endodontic treatment Porcelain fracture Loss of retention Periodontal disease Caries
Goodacre, 2003. Most common fixed partial denture complications?
Caries Need for endodontic treatment Loss of retention Aesthetics Periodontal disease Tooth fracture Prostheses fracture Porcelain veneer fracture
Goodacre, 2003. Most common all ceramic crown complications?
Fracture Loss of retention Pulpal health Caries Periodontal disease
Goodacre, 2003. Most common RBB complications?
De-bonding Tooth discolouration Caries Porcelain fracture Periodontal disease
Goodacre, 2003. Most common post and core complications?
Post loosening
Root fracture
Caries
Periodontal disease
Pjetursson and Lang, 2008. Estimated 5 year survival of: 1. Conventional tooth-supported FDP 2. Cantilever FPD 3. Solely implant-supported FDP 4. Combined tooth-implant-supported FDP 5. Implant supported single crown 6. RBB
Pjetursson and Lang, 2008.
Estimated 5 year survival of:
1. Conventional tooth-supported FDP = 93.8%
2. Cantilever FPD = 91.4%
3. Solely implant-supported FDP = 95.2%
4. Combined tooth-implant-supported FDP = 95.5%
5. Implant supported single crown = 94.5%
6. RBB = 87.7%
Pjetursson and Lang, 2008. Estimated 10 year survival of: 1. Conventional tooth-supported FDP 2. Cantilever FPD 3. Solely implant-supported FDP 4. Combined tooth-implant-supported FDP 5. Implant supported single crown 6. RBB
Pjetursson and Lang, 2008.
Estimated 10 year survival of:
1. Conventional tooth-supported FDP = 89.2%
2. Cantilever FPD = 80.3%
3. Solely implant-supported FDP 86.7%
4. Combined tooth-implant-supported FDP = 77.8%
5. Implant supported single crown = 89.4%
6. RBB = 65%