Breakdown of romantic relationships Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the two theories that explain the breakdown of romantic relationships?

A

Two theories for relationship breakdown are Ducks 4 stage model and Lee’s 5 stage model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does Duck explain the relationship breakdown?

A

Ducks 4-stage model saw breakdown as a process rather than a single event. Duck proposed some factors which can cause a breakdown: The lack of skills such as poor interpersonal skills, the lack of stimulation may lead to boredom or feeling the relationship is not progressing or developing and the lack of maintenance can be caused due to circumstances with partners not spending enough time together due to work commitments leading to strain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the stages of breakdown in Duck’s model?

A

The stages of breakdown in ducks model are:
• Intrapsyhic – Social withdrawal, resentment and feelings of being under-benefitted occur.
• Dyadic – Partners discuss problems and provided it is constructive rather than destructive this could lead to reconciliation. If this is not resolved the breakdown progresses to the next stage.
• Social stage – The breakdown is made public to friends and family. There is negotiation over assets, support is sought from social networks and alliances are made.
• Grave-dressing – A post view of the relationship breakdown is established for why it occurred with each person having their own account. The rebuilding of self-esteem for future relationships occurs here to show trust and loyalty, two important qualities which are under question.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the stages of breakdown in Lee’s model?

A

Lees 5 stage model views breakdown as a process of stages:
• Dissatisfaction – An individual becomes dissatisfied within the relationship
• Exposure – Dissatisfaction is revealed to ones partner
• Negotiation – Discussion occurs over the nature of the unhappiness
• Resolution – Attempts are made to resolve the dissatisfaction
• Termination – If the dissatisfaction is not resolved the relationship ends.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What has Tashiro et al found?

A

Tashiro et al found evidence supporting Ducks model in a study involving students. After breakups they reported not only feeling distress but also personal growth and better insight into themselves and what they wanted from future relationships. Through grave-dressing and resurrection processes they could move on with their lives showing Ducks theory has some credibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Criticism of Tashiro et al’s study?

A

The limitation here is that this study focused only on students meaning the sample was biased, as student social relationship breakdown may be different to that of adults and the wider population therefore lacking external validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Boekhout find?

A

Boekhout et al found supporting evidence for Ducks theory and how lack of skills or stimulation can lead to breakdown. Studying extramarital affairs that occurred his evidence found the reasons given for affairs was a direct reaction to perceived lack of skills or stimulation with men citing lack of sexual excitement, boredom and variety and women citing a lack of attention or emotional satisfaction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Criticism of Boekhout’s study?

A

A criticism is that in such cases the reasons given may not be genuine and purely an account created to portray those committing the affair as the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What has Kassin et al found?

A

Kassin et al found women stress unhappiness and incompatibility while men blame a lack of sex. Women want to remain friends while men want a clean break.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What has Argyle et al found?

A

Argyle et al found further support for gender differences with women also citing a lack of emotional support while men blamed a lack of fun on breakups. The models cannot account for such gender differences suggesting the theories are reductionist and oversimplified with more complex processes factoring in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What has Akert et al found?

A

Akert et al found individual differences with the person who instigated the breakup suffering less negative consequences than the non-instigator and neither models can explain these individual differences. It is possible those initiating the breakup have already come to terms with the relationship ending on some level hence the less negatives and these processes are not factored in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain Lee’s research and it’s application.

A

Lee created his theory based on research and surveys of 112 breakups of non-marital romantic relationships and found the negotiation and exposure stages were the most distressing and emotional draining. Individuals who skipped stages tended to also have less intimate relationships. This shows Lees model may have application for couples who may have longer closer relationships rather than those who have casual relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Criticism of Lee’s research?

A

The main criticism of Lee’s research is that it was based on non-marital relationships and this process of breakup may not fully apply to married couples involving children and shared assets.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the practical implication arising from the models?

A

The models do provide practical implications for counselling and assessing which stage a couple are in can help devise ways to resolve and save the relationship with intervention showing the theories do provide benefits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Limitations of the models’ implication?

A

The criticism of this is that the phases of breakdown are not always universal and not all couples go through them or in the same order as the models propose, some people simply walk away from a relationship. The models do not help us understand fully why breakup occurs either with both models beginning when unhappiness has set in and thus limiting its application.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

3 further criticisms of the models?

A
  1. The main problem for both models is they are based heavily on western society and therefore suffer from cultural bias. In some cultures arranged marriages tend to be more permanent and involve families in crisis, which these models cannot fully explain. Therefore the models can be argued to be ethnocentric and lacking external validity to wider generalisation across different cultures.
  2. Neither model factors in love and how that may play a mitigating role in relationship breakdown yet it is universally accepted as a key component within relationships. In addition neither theory can explain abusive relationships where an abused partner may not initiate the stages of dissolution but instead walk away completely.
  3. Also there is great ethical issues and concern carrying out research of this sensitive nature. This raises the issue of vulnerability of participants and discussing and reliving breakups may cause distress. Privacy is also a concern due to the intensely personal nature of discussing breakups.
17
Q

Name all the researchers in this section.

A
  1. Duck
  2. Lee
  3. Akert
  4. Boekhout
  5. Kassin
  6. Argyle
  7. Tashiro