Break of Day in the Trenches - Isaac Rosenberg Context Flashcards
Explain the contextual influence of Break of Day in the Trenches
• “Here’s a little poem a bit commonplace I’m afraid,” Isaac Rosenberg wrote to his friend, Sonia Rodker in the autumn of 1916
o The poem, In the Trenches, was written by Rosenberg while serving with the British Expeditionary Force in France. A year and a half later, in April 1918, the poet was killed during a wiring patrol near Arras.
o Born in Bristol in 1890, of Lithuanian-Jewish descent, Rosenberg had been raised in considerable poverty in London’s East End. Out of work in 1915, he enlisted chiefly to provide his mother with the “separation allowance”. As a mere private soldier, he would be subject to the most harsh and dismal conditions of any war poet.
o But he was determined nothing would stop his “poeting”. In another letter (to Laurence Binyon) he declared: “I will not leave a corner of my consciousness covered up, but saturate myself with the strange and extraordinary conditions of this life, and it will all refine itself into poetry later on.”
• As a young man, Rosenberg showed considerable natural talent for drawing
o Later he studied art at Birkbeck College and the Slade School of Art in London
o Although he ultimately gave up the visual arts for poetry, the pictorial quality of some of his poems is particularly notable
Explain the structure of Break of Day in the Trenches
• Some poets used unconventional meter and rhythm to approximate the broken rhythms of life during war. While “Break of Day in the Trenches” draws on both conventions of war poetry, its visual imagery is its most important aspect
• A poem in which time juxtaposes with setting to create a new poetic perception of life and death
o It is a short free-verse poem of twenty-six lines, capturing the bemusement of an ordinary infantryman confronting the harshness of existence in the trenches during World War I
o It is also a reverie on life and the persistence of life in the midst of war
• Almost every line contains some reference to violent death, sometimes death on a grand scale
o Yet even in the midst of mass warfare, Rosenberg notes, there is life of a sort. For instance, the poetic speaker’s casual act of plucking a poppy—an act of killing—is juxtaposed with his observations on a living creature, a rat, that approaches close enough to touch the speaker’s hand.
Explain the subject matter of the poem
• With sardonic humour, the speaker compares the rat’s situation with that of ordinary soldiers, observing that the “Droll” animal is able to survive in the fields of battle
o He observes that the trenches and the other demarcations of war that separate the English soldiers from their “enemies” matter little to the rat, which will perhaps cross no-man’s-land to continue its feast on German corpses
• It is this free act of crossing a few miles of open space that figures in the next section of poem
o The speaker marvels at the rat’s ability to survive, while “haughty athletes” with “Strong eyes, fine limbs” are so easily slaughtered
o If the dominant fauna of this environment is the rats that feed on the corpses, the common flora is “Poppies whose roots are in man’s veins,” flowers of blood from wounded soldiers
• This reduction of humans to mere objects is reinforced later in the poem when the movement of the rat is contrasted with the prostration of soldiers, who are “Sprawled in the bowels of the earth.”
o From the description, the soldiers could be either living or dead; perhaps it does not matter much to the speaker
o At least the speaker knows that he himself is still alive, although the slight dust on the poppy he has put behind his ear prefigures the dust of the grave that always stands waiting.
• Similarly, two strong visual images dominate “Break of Day in the Trenches”: the grinning rat and the poppy
o In the first place, the rat imagery encompasses both the animal and the speaker who notices it
• Rosenberg himself described the poem in a letter to his friend Eddie Marsh as “a poem I wrote in the trenches, which is surely as simple as ordinary talk”