Breah Of Duty Flashcards
Nettleship v Weston
Lord Denning - learner drivers are expected to have same standard of care as experienced.
Friend damaged knee caps when driving.
Reasonable Man Test- Blyth v Proprietor of Birmingham Waterworks
Must be free from ideosyncrices, an ‘ordinary’ person
Reasonable Man Test - Glawsgow Corporations
Scolded by a tea urn in a church.
No characteristics taken into account. Objective test. - Macmillan LJ
Children - Mullins v Richards
Same standard of care as children own age.
Rulers, not liable. Wouldn’t think about the consequences.
The disabled
Less standard of care
Motorists - nettleship c Weston
Same standard of care shown by long term and learner drivers. If you are on the road Lord D
People in sport - Condon v Basi
Broke a leg during a match, bad tackle.
Same expertise, should have known better therefore liable
People using specialist skills - wells v cooper
Ameuture not expected to be the same level.
Door handle not fitted properly, not liable as not an expert.
People using equipment - make peace v Evans
Scaffolding, fell off and hurt.
Taken to know how to use it properly.
Scaffolding, fell. Not liable
Donoghue v Stevenson
East avoided duty, breach and causation.