Breach of the Peace Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What case sets out the modern definition of breach of the peace?

A

Smith v Donnelly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the actus reus of BotP?

A

Conduct severe enough to cause alarm to ordinary people AND threaten serious disturbance to the community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the mens rea of BotP?

A

No explicit requirement. Knowledge that conduct ran risk of causing alarm.

IF actus reus established the mens rea is established.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What case confirms that actual alarm is not required because the test is an objective one? (potential to cause alarm)

A

Montgomerie v PF Kilmarnock - staring at children trying to get them in van.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case shows that the disturbance has to be a serious one?

A

Wotherspoon v PF Glasgow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case shows that not all inappropriate behaviour is an offence? Also shows just because member of public thought it was alarming does not mean it meets objective test.

A

McConachie v Shanks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which case states that the context of the disturbance is relevant? (in this case it didn’t make a difference)

A

Walls v Brown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What case shows that the presence of the police is not relevant to the level of disturbance?

A

Dyer v Hutchison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case overturned Young v Heatly

A

Harris v HMA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Harris v HMA state about BotP in private?

A

There must be a public element for a BotP charge. This is part of the Smith v Donnelly test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Harris say in obiter about remarks?

A

They must have a realistic risk of discovery by third party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which two cases show the varying assessments of ‘realistic risk of discovery’?

A

Thompson v MacPhail
McDougall v Dochree
Both in toilet cubilcles but one discovered by looking under toilet one by breaking down door.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which case involving a public licensed taxi on public roads constituted breach of the peace?

A

Bowes v Frame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly