breach of statutory duty Flashcards
BREACH OF STATUTORY DUTY
In some instances, breach of a duty imposed by statute may give rise to a civil claim. If such a claim does exist, it is** en-
tirely separate from a claim in the tort of negligence.** (So, for example, a claimant may be unable to establish a successful claim in negligence, where liability depends upon proving
fault, but may nevertheless be able to succeed in a claim for breach of statutory duty).
BREACH OF STATUTORY DUTY
STATUTES WHICH EXPRESSLY PROVIDE FOR CIVIL CLAIMS
Occupiers’ Liability Acts 1957 and 1984 ; and
Consumer Protection Act 1987
2
STATUTES WHERE CIVIL CLAIMS ARE EXPRESSLY EXCLUDED
- Section 47 of Health and Safety at Work Act 1974
Section 47 excludes civil liability for breaches of the duties imposed on
employers by the Act and by health and safety regulations
made under the Act - As a result, injured employees will generally not be able to
base a claim on breach of statutory duty, and instead will
need to rely on the tort of negligence and establish fault on
the part of the employer.
STATUTES WHICH ARE SILENT AS TO CIVIL LIABILITY
Some statutes impose duties but do not state whether a
breach of those duties would give rise to a civil claim for
damages. In these instances, the court considers several
questions:
- Did Parliament Intend the Statute to Give
Rise to a Civil Claim?
2
Did Parliament Intend the Statute to Give
Rise to a Civil Claim?
- Whether the duty was imposed for the protection of a limited class of the public; and
- Whether the statute provides for any other means of enforcement or other remedies.
4
Once the court is satisfed that the statute may give rise to a civil claim, the claimant must satisfy the following elements in order to establish a successful claim:
- Did Claimant Fall Within the Class of Persons Protected by the Statutory Duty?
- Was the Statutory Duty Breached?
- Was the Damage Suffered by Claimant of a Kind Which the Statute Was Intended to Prevent?
- Was Causation of Damages Established?