Breach Of Duty Flashcards
Reasonable man standard authority
Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Co
No account is taken of D’s personality
Glasgow Corporation v Muir
D’s inexperience is irrelevant
Nettleship v Weston
D’s mental or physical impairments are not taken into account
Roberts v Ramsbottom
D is not liable when under the effects of disabling condition that he was not aware of
Mansfield v Weetabix Ltd
Responsibility is only removed if D is robbed of 100% if reasoning by mental illness
Dunnage v Randall Insurance UK Ltd
In the case of an emergency, D’s conduct should not be judged with hindsight
Parkinson v Liverpool Corporation
Reasonableness is judged as to what is foreseeable at the time of the negligence
Roe v Ministry of Health
Not all foreseeable risks need to be taken into account
Bolton v Stone
Must take into account magnitude of the risk
Miller v Jackson
Must take into account the severity of possible damage
Paris v Stepney BC
Attempting to save a life may justify higher levels of risk
Watt v Hertfordshire CC
Taking risks in the curse of recreational persists may be more difficult to justify
Barnes v Scout Association
Should weigh risk against difficulty in eliminating it
The Wagon Mound No2
Following accepted practice is usually good evidence to prove reasonable care
Morris v West Hartlepool Steam Navigation Co Ltd