BPP Study Manual Chapter 3 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Who is the LC and what is their role?

A

the Lord Chancellor - the Secretary of State for Justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What roles are there in the Supreme Courts?

A
  • President of the Supreme Court
  • Deputy President of the Supreme Court
  • Lord Justices of the Supreme Court
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What authority means the SC isn’t bound by its own decisions?

A

Practice Statement 1966

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What must the SC be wary of when departing from its previous decisions?

A
  • danger of retrospectively disturbing financial arrangements and property rights
  • need for certainty in criminal law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give an example of the HoL overturning its own decisions

A

in R v Shivpuri [1987] the HoL overturned Anderton v Ryan [1985]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When did the SC state its opinions on following its previous decisions, and what were they?

A

in Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] the court stated it did not need to restate the Practice Statement [1966] but that it agreed with it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When was the Court of Appeal split into Criminal and Civil sections?

A

1966

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who is the MR? What is their role?

A

Master of Rolls - Head of Civil Division of Court of Appeal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a LJ and where do they normall sit?

A

a Lord Justice - normally in CoA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What authority allows the CoA to ignore its previous decisions?

A

Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co. Ltd. [1944]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In what case did the CoA try to challenge a SC decision by claiming it was reached ‘per incuriam’?

A

Cassell and Co ltd. v Broome [1972]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What broke the High Court into three divisions?

A

Administration of Justice Act 1970

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What four acts currently govern the High Court?

A
  • Senior Courts Act 1991
  • Courts and Legal Services Act 1990
  • Civil Procedure Act 1997
  • Civil Procedure Rules 1998
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the titles of the heads of the High Court divisions?

A
  • Queen’s Bench: President
  • Family Division: President
  • Chancery Divions: Chancellor of the High Court
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Give an example case that demonstrates how a long line of High Court decision are persuasive

A

Rylands v Fletcher [1866]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What authority governs leapfrogging cases?

A

Adminstration of Justice Act [1969]

17
Q

What authority determined what matters are too serious to be hear in the county court?

A

the Practice Direction [1991]

18
Q

Who is the LCJ? What is he head of? Where does he sit?

A

Lord Chief Justice - the Head of the Judiciary and the Head of Criminal Justice. Also the President of the Courts of England and Wales. He sits in the Court of Appeal (Criminal)

19
Q

Is the Court of Appeal (Crim) bound by its own decisions? What authority controls this?

A

Usually, unless the court believes that following the previous decision would unfairly convict someone. R v Taylor [1950]

20
Q

What determines whether a case can go to the SC from the CoA (Crim)? What authority?

A

Due to Criminal Appeal Act 1968

  • CA Crim must certify that a point of law of public importance has been raised
  • CA Crim or SC must be satisfied that the point of law is one which should be considered in the SC
21
Q

What allows the CA to quash the acquittal of anyone convicted of a ‘serious offence’?

A

Criminal Justice Act 2003

22
Q

Give an example of an important Privy Council case

A

Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936]

23
Q

Which Privy Council decision was preferred to which HL decision? In which case?

A

In R v James; R v Karimi [2006]:

Her Majesty’s Attorney General for Jersey v Holley [2005] was preferred to R v Smith (Morgan) [2001]