Bottom Up Approach Flashcards

1
Q

Define the bottom up approach

A

Profiler work up from evidence collected from crime scene→ develop hypotheses about likely characteristics,motivations & social background of offender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define investigative psychology

A

Form bottom up profiling that matches details from crime scene with statistical analysis of typical offender behaviour pattern based on psychological theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  • Define geographical profiling
A

Form bottom up profiling based on principle of spatial consistency= Offender operational base & possible future offences revealed by geographical location of previous crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the aim of BUA

A

Generate picture of offender→ their likely characteristics, routine behaviour and social background

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What method is used to investigate BUAS aim

A

though statistical analysis of evidence at crime scene

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  • Where is bu approach used
A

Britain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does bu approach differ from the top down (2)

A
  • Does not begin with fix typologies→ profile is ‘data driven’ + emerges as investigator engages in deeper and more rigorous scrutiny of details of offence
    • Much more grounded in psychological theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain investigative psychology (3)

A

Attempt to apply statistical procedures alongside psychological theory→ To analysis of crime scene evidence

Establish patterns of behaviour that likely to occur or co exist across crime scenes⇒ to develop statistical ‘database’ which then acts as baseline for comparison 

Specific details of offence or related offences can be matched against this database→ reveal important details about offender, their personal history, family background, etc. + whether series of offences are linked in that they’re likely to have been committed by same person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is interpersonal coherence

A

Central to this approach

Watt that’s offender behaves at crime scene, including how they ‘intersect’ with victim⇒ may reflect their everyday behaviour→ eg while some rapists want to maintain max control and humiliate their victims, others more apologetic (Dwyer)⇒ tell police how offender relates to women more generally
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is forensic awareness

A

Describes individuals who have been subject of police interrogation before→ behaviour may denote how mindful they’re at covering tracks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who first described geographical profiling

A

Rossmo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain what this person explained about geographical profiling (4)

A

Uses info to do with location of linked crime scenes to make inferences about likely home or operational base of offender= crime mapping

Can also be used in conjunction with psychological theory→ to create hypotheses about how offender is thinking as well as their modus operandi (signature way of working) 

Assumption is that serial offenders will restrict their ‘work’ to geographical areas they’re familiar with→ so understanding spatial pattern of their behaviour provides investigation with ‘central gravity’ which likely include offenders base (often in middle) 

Help investigator to make educated guess where offender likely to strike= jeopardy surface
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the two models proposed by canters circle theory

A
  • Marauder: who operates in cose proximity to their home base
    • Commuter: who likely have travelled distance away from their usual residence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does canter’s circle theory suggest (2)

A

Pattern of offending likely to form circle astound their usual residence→ becomes more apparent the more offences there are

Such spatial decision making can offer investigative team insight into nature of offence→ eg were planned or opportunistic + reveal other important factors about offender such as ‘mental maps’, mode of transport, employment, status, approximate age etc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

evaluate the evidence for investigative psychology (+ve) (4)

A

Canter & Heritage

conducted content analysis of 66 sexual assault cases→ using smallest space analysis= computer program that identifies correlation across patterns of behaviour 

Several characteristics identified as common in most cases eg interpersonal language & lack of reaction to victim 

These characteristics occur in diff pattern in diff individuals→ can lead to understanding of how offenders behaviour may change over series of offences or establish whether 1 or more offences were committed by same person 

Sees how statistical technique can be applied
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluate evidence for geographical profiling (+ve) (3)

A

Lundrigan & Canter

Collated info from 120 murder cases involving serial killers in USA

Smallest space analysis revealed: spatial consistency in behaviour of killers⇒ location of body disposal site was in diff direction from previous→ create ‘centre of gravity’ → offenders base was invariably located in centre of pattern 

Effect more noticeable for marauders
17
Q

Evaluate wider application of the bua (+ve) (2)

A

Applies to wider range of offences

Techniques such as smallest space analysis & principle of spatial consistency⇒ investigate crime such as burglary & theft + murder & rape
18
Q

Evaluate mixed results for profiling case using bua (-ve)

A

Despite many successes in BU profiling→ has had some significant failures

Rachel nickels case: Rachel nickell raped and stabbed→ only witness was 2 yr old son→ wrongfully convicted stagg→ individual that was walking his dogs in area & fitted offenders profile→ year later new evidence reviewed finding Napper was offender→ was ruled out on earlier stages of profiling bc didn’t meet profiling of offenders height