Book 4: Equity Flashcards
What are some different definitions of value?
Intrinsic value: valuation with complete understanding of characteristics of asset or issuing firm. Most relevant metric.
IV = actual mispricing + valuation error
IV_analyst - price = (IV_actual - price) + (IV_analyst - IV_actual)
Liquidation value: estimate of what assets would be worth if sold separately, net of company’s liabilities. (versus going concern value, which assumes going concern).
Fair market value: price at which willing, informed and able seller would trade asset to willing, informed and able buyer. Market price should reflect fair market value over time.
Investment value: value of a stock to a specific buyer, taking into account his synergies and expectations.
What’s the difference between an absolute valuation and relative valuation model?
Absolute: estimates asset’s intrinsic value, without regard to value of other firms. Eg FCF approach, dividend discount model, residual income approach, asset-based models (sum of market value of assets).
Relative: determine value of asset in relation to other assets. Eg comparing multiples (P/E).
- pairs trading: 2 similar stocks, buy undervalued one and short overvalued one.
What is sum-of-parts valuation?
Adding up individual parts of firm to determine value of whole. aka breakup value or private market value.
Conglomerate discount: investors apply markdown to value of company operating in multiple unrelated industries, compared to one with a single industry focus. This market value under-represents sum-of-parts value. Due to:
- Internal capital inefficiency
- Endogenous (internal) factors
- Research measurement errors
What is the holding period return (HPR)?
HPR is the increase in price of an asset + any CF received, divided by initial price of the asset.
HPR = (P1 - P0 + CF1) / P0
HPR = [(P1 + CF1) / P0] - 1
HPR = CF1 / P0 + [(P1 - P0) / P0]
HPR = dividend yield + price appreciation return (aka capital gains yield)
If CF is received before end of period, then CF1 should be cash received plus any interest on reinvestment of the CF.
HPR = (end of period value / beginning of period value) - 1
HPR = (Price at end of period + Dividend over period / Price at beginning of period) - 1
Expected alpha = Expected return - required return
Realised alpha = Actual HPR - Contemporaneous required return
What is price convergence to intrinsic value?
If expected return != required return, there can be a “return from convergence of price to intrinsic value”.
expected return = required return + [(V0 - P0) / P0]
V0 = intrinsic value
What is equity risk premium (ERP) and how is it used to get required RoR?
ERP is the return in excess of the RFR that investors require.
Equity risk premium = require return on equity index - RFR
Required RoR = RFR + Beta*equity risk premium
Beta provides adjustment for systematic risk inherent in stock. If systematic risk is > than market, then B > 1.
Required RoR = RFR + equity risk premium + other risk premia/discounts
What are historical vs. forward-looking estimates of the equity risk premium?
Historical: Consist of difference b/w historical mean return for a broad-based equity index and a RFR over a time period. Objective and simple. However, assumes mean and variance of returns are constant over time, which is not always realistic. Historical estimates can also be upward bias due to survivorship bias (only firms that have survived are included in sample). Also take care whether determining with geometric mean or arithmetic mean. Geometric mean increasingly preferred for historical estimates. And if yield curve slopes upward, whether using LT or ST bonds to estimate RFR. LT generally preferred.
Forward-looking (ex ante): Use current info an expectations concerning economic and financial variables. Does not rely on assumption of stationary and is less subject to problems like survivorship bias. Includes Gordon growth model, supply-side models, and estimates from surveys (use consensus of opinions from survey of experts).
What is the Gordon growth model (aka constant growth model)?
Forward-looking estimate of ERP.
GGM ERP = expected dividend yield + expected LT growth rate - current LT govt bond yield.
GGM ERP = (1-year forecasted dividend yield on market index) + (consensus LT earnings growth rate) - (LT govt bond yield)
GGM ERP = (D1 / P) + g - rLTg0
Weakness: assumes stable dividend and growth rate. If growth rate is too variable could use:
equity index price = PV of projected CFs during rapid growth stage + …transitional growth stage + …mature growth stage
Also can be used to determine stock price:
P0 = D1 / (ke - g)
ke = RoR on equity (not the expected return for market, don’t be fooled, solve it by CAPM)
g = dividend growth
What are supply-side (macroeconomic) models (ie Ibbotson-Chen) for estimating ERP?
Forward-looking estimate of ERP based on relationships b/w macroeconomic and financial variables. Uses proven models and current info. Weakness: estimates only appropriate for developed countries where equity represents large share of economy.
ERP = {[(1 + i) * (1 + rEg) * (1 + PEg) - 1] + Y} - RFR
i = expected inflation (eg difference in YTM of 20 year T-bond vs 20 -year TIPS)
rEg = expected real growth in real earnings per share (eg expected growth in corporate earnings, estimated as GDP growth, or labor productivity growth rate + labor supply growth rate, or)
PEg = expected changes in P/E ratio (depends whether analyst thinks market is overvalued (P/E ratios would tend to decrease))
Y = expected (dividend) yield on the index
RFR = expected (LT) RFR
Estimating required return via CAPM?
Required RoR on stock j = RFR + Bj*(ERP)
E(Ra) = Rf + Ba[E(Rmkt) - Rf]
The relationship between beta and expected return. In equilibrium, the expected return on risky asset E(Ra) is the RFR (Rf) plus a beta-adjusted market risk premium, Ba[E(Rmkt) - Rf].
Strength is it’s simple and uses only one factor. Weakness is choosing appropriate factor and low explanatory power in some cases.
Estimating required return via multifactor model?
CAPM is a single factor model.
required return = RFR + (risk premium_1) + risk premium_2) + …
risk premium_i = factor sensitivity_i * factor risk premium_i
Factor sensitivity: factor beta; asset’s sensitivity to a particular factor
Factor risk premium: expected return above RFR from a unit sensitivity to the factor and zero sensitivity to all other factors.
Strength: high explanatory power. Weakness: more complex and expensive.
Estimating required return via the Fama-French model?
Fama-French is a multifactor model that attempts to account for higher returns associated with small-cap stocks. Incorporates market, size, and value risk (eg financial distress) factors.
Required return of j = RFR + Bmkt,j * (Rmkt - RFR) + Bsmb,j * (Rsmall - Rbig) + Bhml,j * (Rhbm - Rlbm)
(Rmkt - RFR): return on value-weighted market index less 1-month T-bill RFR
(Rsmall - Rbig): small-cap return on premium, equal to avg return on 3 small-cap portfolio less avg return on 3 large-cap portfolio
(Rhbm - Rlbm): value return on premium, equal to avg return on 2 high book-to-market portfolios less avg return on 2 low book-to-market portfolios
Baseline value for Bmkt,j is 1, baseline value for Bsmb,j and Bhml,j is 0. We expect a positive size beta if entity’s market cap is small.
Estimating required return via the Pastor-Stambaugh model?
Adds a liquidity factor to the Fama-French model. Baseline for liquidity factor is zero. Less liquid assets should have positive beta, while more liquid assets should have negative beta.
Required return of j = RFR + Bmkt,j * (Rmkt - RFR) + Bsmb,j * (Rsmall - Rbig) + Bhml,j * (Rhbm - Rlbm) + [Bliquidity,j * liquidity premium]
(Rmkt - RFR): return on value-weighted market index less RFR
(Rsmall - Rbig): small-cap return on premium, equal to avg return on small-cap portfolio less avg return on large-cap portfolios
(Rhbm - Rlbm): value return on premium, equal to avg return on high book-to-market portfolios less avg return on low book-to-market portfolios
Estimating required return via macroeconomic multifactor models?
Burmeister, Roll and Ross model incorporates 5 factors:
- Confidence risk: unexpected change in difference b/w return of risky corporate bonds and govt bonds
- Time horizon risk: unexpected change in difference b/w return of LT govt bonds and treasury bills
- Inflation risk: unexpected changes due to inflation
- Business cycle risk: unexpected change in level of real business activity
- Market timing risk: equity market return not explained by other four factors
In a problem:
required return = RFR + (different risks * their respective sensitivity facotrs)
Estimating required return via build-up method?
Similar to risk premium approach. Usually applied to closely held companies where betas are not readily obtainable.
Required return = RFR + ERP + size premium + specific-company premium
Size premium depends on size of company, larger premium for smaller companies.
Strength: simple and can apply to closely held companies. Weakness: use historical values as estimates that may or may not be relevant to current market conditions.
Estimating required return via bond-yield plus risk premium method?
A build-up method that is appropriate if company has publicly traded debt.
Adds a risk premium to the YTM of company’s LT debt.
BYPRP cost of equity = YTM on company’s LT debt + ERP
YTM of bonds includes effects of inflation, leverage and sensitivity to business cycle. Because these are taken into account already, can simply add premium for added risk arising from equity.
Explain beta estimation for public companies?
Can compute beta for public company by regressing returns of company’s stock on returns of overall market.
When forecasting ERP, may adjust beta for beta drift (tendency of an estimated beta to revert to a value of 1 over time).
adjusted beta = (2/3 * regression beta) + (1/3 * 1)