Board committees Flashcards
Which companies does Regulation 43 of the Companies Act apply?
listed public companies
state-owned companies
any other company that has a ‘public interest’ score of above 500 points in two of the previous 5 years
Section 72 (8) of the Companies Act provides that the social and ethics committee is entitled to .... .... .... .... ....
- require from any director or prescribed officer of the company any information or explanation necessary for the performance of the committee’s functions
- request from any employee of the company any information or explanation necessary for the performance of the committee’s functions
- attend any general shareholders’ meeting
- receive all notices of and other communication relating to any general shareholders’ meeting
- be heard at any general shareholders’ meeting on any part of the business of the meeting that concerns the committee’s functions
Companies calculate their public interest score by awarding one point for each .... .... .... ....
- average number of employees during the year
- number of millions of rands of liabilities at the financial year end
- number of millions of rands of turnover during the financial year
- number of individuals with an interest in a profit company’s securities, or of members of non-profit company at the financial year end
The functions of the social and ethics committee as given under Regulation 43(5) of the Companies Act
To monitor the company’s activities, having regard to any relevant legislation, other legal requirements or prevailing codes of best practice, with regard to matters relating to:
a) Social and economic development, including the company’s standing in terms of the purposes and goals of:
i. the 10 principles set out in the United Nations Global Compact Principles
ii. the OECD recommendations regarding corruption
iii. The Employment Equity Act
iv. The Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act
b) Good corporate citizenship, including the company’s
i. Promotion of equality, prevention of unfair discrimination and reduction of corruption
ii. Contribution to the development of the communities in which its activities are predominantly conducted, or within which its products or services are predominantly marketed
iii. Record of sponsorship, donations and charitable giving
c) The environment, health and public safety including the impact of the company’s activities and of its products or services
d) Consumer relationships, including the company’s advertising, public relations and compliance with consumer protection laws
e) Labour and employment, including
i. The company’s standing in terms of the International Labour Organization Protocol on decent work and working conditions
ii. The company’s employment relationships, and its contribution towards the educational development of its employees
To draw matters within its mandate to the attention of the board, as occasion requires
To report, through one of its members, to the shareholders at the company’s annual general meeting, on the matters within its mandate
What is the purpose of the audit committee?
it is to provide additional focus on financial issues that are vital to the company but which often cannot be fully examined by the main board because of the shortage of time available to the board
Statutory duties of the audit committee
To nominate, for appointment as auditor of the company under Section 90, a registered auditor who, in the opinion of the audit committee, is independent of the company
To determine the fees to be paid to the auditor and the auditor’s terms of engagement
To ensure that the appointment of the auditor complies with the provisions of the Companies Act and any other legislation relating to the appointment of auditors
To determine, subject to the provisions of this Chapter, the nature and extent of any non-audit services that the auditor may provide to the company, or that the auditor must not provide to the company, or a related company
To pre-approve any proposed agreement with the auditor for the provision of non-audit services to the company
To prepare a report, to be included in the annual financial statements for that financial year
- describing how the audit committee carried out its duties
- stating whether the audit committee is satisfied that the external auditor was independent of the company
- commenting in any way the committee considers appropriate on the financial statements, the accounting practices and the internal financial control of the company
To receive and deal appropriately with any concerns or complaints whether from within or outside the company, or on its own initiative relating to:
- the accounting practices and internal audit of the company
- the content or auditing of the company’s financial statements
- the internal financial controls of the company
- any related matter
To make submissions to the board on any matter concerning the company’s accounting policies, financial control, records and reporting
To perform such other oversight functions determined by the board
State section 72 (1) to (4) of the Companies Act with regards to board committees
Except to the extent that the Memorandum of Incorporation of a company provides otherwise, the board of a company may:
- appoint any number of committees of directors, and
- may delegate to any committee any of the authority of the board
Except to the extent that the Memorandum of Incorporation of a company, or a resolution establishing a committee, provides otherwise, the committee:
- may include persons who are not directors of the company, but
- any such person must not be ineligible or disqualified to be a director, in terms of section 69, and
- no such person has a vote on a matter to be decided by the committee
The creation of a committee, delegation of any power to a committee, or action taken by a committee, does not alone satisfy or constitute compliance by a director with the required duty of a director to the company, as set out in section 76
The Minister may, by regulation, prescribe that a company or categories of companies, must appoint a social and ethics committee, if it is desirable in the public interest, having regard to:
- its annual turnover
- the size of its workforce, or
- the nature and extent of its activities
What does King IV require the boards to consider with respect to the composition of committees?
Effective collaboration between committees through appropriate cross-membership
A balanced distribution of power, so that no individual has the ability to dominate decision-making
Each committee, as a whole, should have the necessary knowledge, skills, experience and capacity to execute its duties effectively
Each committee should have a minimum of 3 members, subject to applicable legal provisions
Members of the executive and senior management should be invited to attend committee meetings either by a standing invitation or on an ad hoc basis to provide pertinent information and insights in their areas of responsibility
The chair of the board should not be a member of the audit committee
State the recommended terms of reference and powers of each committee
The terms of reference and powers of each committee should be in writing and approved by the board, and they should, at a minimum, deal with the following:
- the composition of the committee and, if applicable, the process and criteria for the appointment of any committee members who are not members of the governing body
- the committee’s overall role and associated responsibilities
- delegated authority with respect to decision-making
- the tenure of the committee
- when and how the committee should report to the board and others
- the committee’s access to resources and information
- the meeting procedures to be followed, and
- the arrangements for evaluation of the committee’s performance
Comment on the King IV Code’s recommendations regarding the risk committee
King IV recommends that the governing body should consider allocating the oversight of risk governance to a dedicated committee, or adding it to the responsibilities of another committee (often the audit committee), as is appropriate for the organisation
There are two reasons why the risk management function should not report to the audit committee, but should be monitored by a separate risk committee, and these are:
- Firstly, as a consequence of the composition of the (audit) committee, the function will often have financial focus when risk management should correctly extend far beyond the finances of a company
- Secondly, the audit committee should act as an independent oversight body
The role of the committee is to perform an oversight function. In doing so, it should consider the risk policy and plan, determine the company’s risk appetite and risk tolerance, ensure that risk assessments are performed regularly, monitor the whole risk management process, and receive assurance from internal and external assurance providers regarding the effectiveness of the risk management process.
It is important to note that these responsibilities are performed by the risk committee on behalf of the board. Ultimately the board remains responsible for the final approval of the risk policy and risk management.
The purpose of the committee is to enable the board to give risk management the attention it deserves by providing a forum for the detailed consideration of risks facing the company and the measures adopted to avoid or manage those risks
If the committees for audit and risk are separate, the governing body should consider for one or more members to have joint membership of both committees for more effective functioning
The committee for risk governance should have executive and non-executive members, with a majority being non-executive members of the governing body
The chairperson of the committee should be a non-executive director. The chair of the board may chair this committee.
The purpose, composition and responsibilities of the remuneration committee
The purpose of the remuneration committee is to ensure that directors are appropriately rewarded for their work in a manner that will ensure, as far as possible, the recruitment, retention and appropriate motivation of people with the skills that the company needs
It is essential that management’s remuneration is structured to ensure that their actions are directed towards the long-term benefit of stakeholders
The remuneration committee should (only) consist of non-executive directors of whom a majority, including the chair, should be independent
The remuneration committee members should be completely independent from the organisation’s management, and they should not have any personal interest in the outcome of the remuneration committee’s decision
The main requirement is that the members of the committee should have a broad business experience and a good knowledge of the company, its executives and business strategy
One of the most important responsibilities of the members of the committee is to be up to date with appropriate levels, structuring methods and types of remuneration offered in the environment that the organisation operates
Sound financial acumen is extremely important for members of the committee to be able to appreciate what the likely impact on the company will be of the committee’s remuneration decisions, particularly with respect to long-term performance-based remuneration
As the remuneration committee consists of non-executive directors, it is inappropriate for it to recommend the basis of remuneration of non-executive directors. This should be a matter for the board as a whole and ultimately requires approval by special resolution of shareholders in a general meeting
The committee should consider all aspects, including both fixed and variable pay, as well as pension arrangements and benefits in kind
State section 94(2) of the Companies Act in relation to the appointment of an audit committee
a) At each annual general meeting, a public company or state-owned company, or other company that has voluntarily determined to have an audit committee as contemplated in section 34(2), must elect an audit committee comprising at least three members, unless—
i. the company is a subsidiary of another company that has an audit committee; and
ii. the audit committee of that other company will perform the functions required under this section on behalf of that subsidiary company.
b) The first members of the audit committee may be appointed by—
i. the incorporators of a company; or
ii. the board, within 40 business days after the incorporation of the company
State section 94(4) of the Companies Act in relation to the membership of the audit committee
Each member of the audit committee of a company must:
a) be a director of the company, who satisfies any applicable requirements prescribed in terms of subsection (5);
b) not be—
i. involved in the day-to-day management of the company’s business or have been so involved at any time during the previous financial year;
ii. a prescribed officer, or full-time employee, of the company or another related or inter-related company, or have been such an officer or employee at any time during the previous three financial years; or
iii. a material supplier or customer of the company, such that a reasonable and informed third party would conclude in the circumstances that the integrity, impartiality or objectivity of that director is compromised by that relationship; and
c) not be related to any person who falls within any of the criteria set out in paragraph (b).
What is the Combined Assurance Model
A combined assurance model incorporates and optimizes all assurance services and functions so that, taken as a whole, these enable an effective control environment, support the integrity of information used for internal decision-making by management, the governing body and its committees, and supports the integrity of the organization’s external reports
State the recommended practices for assurance set out in the King IV Code
The governing body should assume responsibility for assurance by setting the direction concerning the arrangements for assurance services and functions. The governing body should delegate to the audit committee, if in place, the responsibility for overseeing that those arrangements are effective in achieving the following objectives:
a. Enabling an effective control environment
b. Supporting the integrity of information used for internal decision-making by management, the governing body and its committees
c. Supporting the integrity of external reports
• The governing body should satisfy itself that a combined assurance model is applied which incorporates and optimizes the various assurance services and functions so that, taken as a whole, these support the objectives for assurance
• The governing body should oversee that the combined assurance model is designed and implemented to cover effectively the organization’s significant risks and material matters, through a combination of the following assurance service providers and functions, as is appropriate for the organization:
a. The organisation’s line functions that own and manage risks
b. The organisation’s specialist functions that facilitate and oversee risk management and compliance
c. Internal auditors, internal forensic fraud examiners and auditors, safety and process assessors and statutory actuaries
d. Independent external assurance service providers such as external auditors
e. Regulatory inspectors
• The governing body and its committees should assess the output of the organisation’s combined assurance with objectivity and professional scepticism, and by applying an enquiring mind, form their own opinion on the integrity of information and reports, and the degree to which an effective control environment has been achieved