Block 2 - Quality Management Flashcards

1
Q

Quality control

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Proactive leadership

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Compliance checklist

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Firm varieties

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Benchmark

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Public trust

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Flexible approach

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Policies for firms

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Big firms, complex, more resources, QM becomes complex

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ISQM 1: Audit and Reviews of Financial Statements

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ISQM 2: Engagement Quality Review

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Reviewer

A

As a control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

System of quality management

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Eight components

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Devise, implement, revise

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Firm risk assessment process

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Identify and mitigate risk to ensure quality

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Process

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Tailor

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Firm’s size and complexity

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Partners sit down

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Process of audit

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Each stage has quality management implemented

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Competent, well trained individuals

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Process of audit

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Quality objectives

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Detection risk reduced

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Credibility is high

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Detection risk is high (identity and mitigate)

A

Accept bad client, not good planning, delegate wrongly, not identify risks well, now review papers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Junior

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Risky, complex areas

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Governance and leadership

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Tone of the top

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Group auditors intimidation

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Compromise opinion

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Rewards commitment to skepticism rather then income generation

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Ethical requirements

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Own policies beyond IESBA

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Acceptance

A

First time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Continuance

A

Years later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Client relationship

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Assess client integrity

A
43
Q

Client screening

A
44
Q

Firms financial and operational priorities

A
45
Q

Inappropriate judgements

A
46
Q

Resources not there

A

Client should not accept, and not accept just because of money

47
Q

Existing business relationships

A
48
Q

New year

A
49
Q

New identity checks

A

Start of new engagements

50
Q

Evaluate conflicts of interest and reassess competence

A
51
Q

Engagement performance

A
52
Q

Issues - lack of direction, supervision, junior doing complex work

A
53
Q

Team responsibility understanding to gather sufficient, appropriate evidence

A

What is responsibility and how to do it

54
Q

Less experienced

A
55
Q

Supervised and reviewed

A

Given guidance, checks and balances

56
Q

Supervised and reviewed

A

Given guidance, checks and balances

57
Q

Engagement partner appropriately involved in engagement

A

Planning, involvement in acceptance, review, finalization

58
Q

Not doing fieldwork

A
59
Q

Manager updates on issues and problems, consults engagement partner regularly, critical areas especially

A

Completion, communication with audit committees, discussing issues

60
Q

Partner signs report

A
61
Q

Partner signs report

A
62
Q

Professional scepticism and judgement - proper review and supervision.

A
63
Q

Time panic rush

A

Reduce procedures, reduce sample = raise detection risk and quality management will be compromised

64
Q

Inadequate supervision

A
65
Q

Teams consult on difficult issues raised by enagement quality reviewer

A
66
Q

Brought to attention by

A
67
Q

Management and team difference of opinion

A

Management aggression and not give enough information - resolve issues because it will affect audit opinion.

68
Q

Perform opinion so rightly issued

A
69
Q

Resources

A
70
Q

Assignment of tram

A
71
Q

Appropriate resources

A
72
Q

Timely manner

A
73
Q

Competence

A
74
Q

Tailored Training

A
75
Q

Capabilities

A
76
Q

Up to date

A
77
Q

Criticize

A
78
Q

Consequences

A
79
Q

Complex nature

A
80
Q

Senior members of the

A
81
Q

Experts

A

E.g. fair value

82
Q

Information and communication

A

Obtaining, generating, using information

83
Q

Consultations between team and manager, team and previous auditor, etc.

A
84
Q

Other components operate

A
85
Q

Consultations

A
86
Q

Knowledge of the business

A
87
Q

Communication policies, procedures, money laundering breach, NOCLAR breach

A
88
Q

Within team, partners, audit committee, TCWG, regulator, group and component auditor

A
89
Q

Timely, to implement right thing

A
90
Q

Documented

A
91
Q

Criticise

A
92
Q

Firm communicates: firm policies on ethics, trading materials for ethics manuals, declaration by every team member that no conflicts of interest, register evidence of training (attendance register and topic)

A
93
Q

Communication documentation

A

Client acceptance, risk assessment documentation, client identity documents, engagement letter issued, audit programmed procedures, role assignments and delegation, client information obtained from working papers and digital automated tools, conclusions, reports to management and TCWG on audit issues.

94
Q

Monitoring

A
95
Q

Whether quality management policies are followed and whether system works rightly

A
96
Q

Monitoring and remediation

A
97
Q

Effectiveness and identify deficiencies

A
98
Q

Communicate and rectify in timely manner

A
99
Q

Engagement quality reviewer

A
100
Q

Lower detection risk to publish credible and right audit report.

A
101
Q

Competence equals better judgements

A
102
Q

Negative implications/repercussions

A
103
Q

Public interest is greater then self-interest

A
104
Q

Public interest is greater then self-interest

A