Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Social Science Methodology > Block 1: Introduction to X-centered research designs (Lesson 1) > Flashcards

Block 1: Introduction to X-centered research designs (Lesson 1) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Biology 101 flashcards Sociology 101 flashcards
1
Q

Method

A

Specific procedure for gathering and analyzing data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Methodology

A

Tasks, strategies and criteria governing scientific inquiry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Research design

A

Plan for carrying out a given study, commonly involving a sequence of research steps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

X-centred methodology

A

Population / variable oriented research Main book: Gerring Main article: Ross (2006): “Is democracy good for the poor?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Y-centred methodology

A

Case oriented research Main book: Blatter & Haverland Main article: Beland & Hacker (2004): “Ideas, private institutions and American welfare state ‘exceptionalism’: the case of health and old-age insurance, 1915–1965

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Between X and Y-centered methodologies

A

Interpretive (critical) research Main book: Schwartz-Shea & Yanow Main article: Best (2010): “The IMF’s Constructivist Strategy in Critical Perspective”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the difference between the social and natural sciences?

A

Focus of social sciences is mankind, not as part of nature, but as creator and product of history

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the difference between social science and the humanities?

A

Social science studies human actions in a systematic and falsifiable way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Experiments

A

Focus on the treatment effect (x-centered/ variable) Extrapolate to a bigger polulation than the analyzed sampe (population-oriented reserach, not case, not interpretive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Issues with experiments

A

How representative is the sample of the overall population? Was the correct methodology used?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Gerring’s conceptualization of a case study

A

Study of a single unit for the purpose of understanding a class of similar units (Gerring’s conceptualization).

This is actually a sample!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Definition of a unit (case study)

A

A spatially limited phenomenon (e.g. nation- state) observed at a single point in time or over some limited time period.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Population in a case study, definition and what does it consist of?

A

The empirical boundaries of the set of cases relevant to an investigation A population is comprised of a sample as well as unstudied cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sample in a case study

A

The sample is all the studied cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does a case consist of?

A

Variables (relevant dimensions), built on observation(s)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Definition of a variable

A

Unidimensional factor that can have various values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Data cell (table)

A

[Image]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Variable (table)

A

[Image]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Observation (table)

A

[Image]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Case (table)

A

[Image]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Case study/ sample (table)

A

[Image]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Comparative study sample (table)

A

[Image]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Population (table)

A

[Image]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Single-outcome study

A

Case which does not belong to a larger category of cases Note: Case selection is NOT a problem Example: The French Revolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Aim of a single-outcome (case) study

A

Investigate a bounded unit in an attempt to explain a single outcome within that unit

26
Q

Critique of single-outcome (case) studies

A

Population-oriented researchers say you cannot learn much from such studies

27
Q

Why is the choice of population important in population-oriented research?

A

Due to missing negative cases (cases which don’t show the outcome of interest)

28
Q

What does the research question determine (in population-oriented research)

A

Size of population and which variables/ observations are included

29
Q

Scope conditions

A

Criteria specifying the appropriate range of cases based on theory OR scope conditions = define the population Based on a condition/ variable, BUT can also be both a causal effect (causal condition)

30
Q

Causal condition

A

Causal effect put on the population

31
Q

Should a defined population be changed?

A

King, Keohane & Verba: No, too easy to omit unfavorable cases Ragin, Yes, but only with very good reasons

32
Q

Ragin’s reasons for changing a defined population

A

Unrecognized heterogeneity = There are sub-groups in the population Inflexibility = Never changing the population means that you assume “causal homogeneity” (same causal relationship for all cases) without checking for appropriateness

33
Q

Why is case selection important in x-centered research?

A

Affects the answers you get

34
Q

Main problems of case selection (x-centered)

A

1) Defining the population (stretching vs relevance) 2) How to select the case which is worth analyzing

35
Q

What is the goal of sampling? (x-centered)

A

Make a representative sample for the population so that you can make an (unbiased) inference from the sample to the population

36
Q

Definition of sampling bias

A

Distortion in the representativeness of the sample, where some members of the population have a lower chance of being selected for inclusion in the sample

37
Q

Main distinction in sampling strategies

A

Random and non-random selection

38
Q

Random selection sampling strategies

A

SSSM

  • Simple random sample: Complete randomization
  • Systematic sample: First pick randomly and then follow a selection rule
  • Stratified random sampling: Independent sampling in each level
  • Multi-stage cluster sampling: Hierarchical structure of data, with sampling at each level
39
Q

Non-random selection sampling strategies

A

Convenient Snow Quotas

  • Convenience sampling
  • Snowball sampling (ask interviewees to create a contact or to forward survey)
  • Quota sampling (interviewer needs to satisfy quotas, determined by research design)
40
Q

Why do we use random sampling?

A

To ensure that the sample average represents the population

41
Q

Strategies to use if there are too few cases?

A
  • Select all cases (sample = population) - Convenience sampling (e.g. data availability) - Deliberate (theory-driven) selection
42
Q

Deliberate (theory-driven) selection methods

A

“PC Teddy” PC TEDDI

pathway,

crucial (least likely and most likely),

typical,

extreme,

deviant,

diverse,

influential

43
Q

Typical selection method

A
  • Goal:* How want to study the mechanism linking X to Y / hypothesis testing
  • Case selection*: A low-residual case (on-lier)
  • Desired outcome:* Your cross-case argument can be observed also within-case
44
Q

Diverse cases selection method

A
  • Goal:* Analysis of variation of X and Y (hypothesis generating)
  • Case selection:* Combine values of X and Y
  • Desired outcome*: Improve understanding of how X and Y are connected
45
Q

Extreme case selection method

A
  • Goal:* (Explorative) study by looking at extreme examples
  • Case selection:* (Very) high scores on X and Y
  • Desired outcome:* Hypothesis generation
46
Q

Deviant case selection method

A
  • Goal:* Identify the missing element of a valid X-Y relationship
  • Case selection:* Find an outlier
  • Desired outcome:* Complements the X-Y relationship and does not disprove it
47
Q

Influential case selection method

A
  • Goal:* Check robustness of X-Y relationship by studying cases that heavily influence the relationship (shifts it)
  • Case selection*: Statistical
  • Desired outcome*: X-Y relationship holds
48
Q

Least likely case selection method

A
  • Goal:* You want to show that a theory is correct
  • Case selection:* You pick the case where your theory is least likely to hold
  • Desired outcome*: Your theory holds even in the least likely case
49
Q

Most likely case selection method

A
  • Goal:* You want to show that an (established) theory is wrong
  • Case selection:* You pick the case for which the theory is most likely to hold
  • Desired outcome*: The theory does not even work in the most likely case
50
Q

Pathway case selection method

A
  • Goal:* You know that X causes Y, but you are not sure about the causal mechanism linking them together
  • Case selection:* You pick a case in which X and Y are present, but all other potential causes of Y are absent
  • Desired outcome:* You can find the mechanism linking X to Y
51
Q

On what do you base selection on for necessary conditions?

A

The dependent variable (y)

52
Q

When using deliberate (theory-driven) selection, what do you base the selection on?

A

The independent variable (x), unless you have used random sampling

53
Q

Describe Gerring’s criterial approach

A

Based on hypothetical ideal types and not real world features. Stress certain elements to further understanding. Ideational constructs that help us better understand the world

54
Q

Implications of Gerring’s criterial approach

A

Criteria are true, under ceteris paribus conditions Tradoffs are necessary Experimental template is the ideal

55
Q

Goals of causal inference in social science

A
  • CAD*
  • Causality: To say that a factor, X, is a cause of an outcome, Y
  • Appraisal: Is it falsifiable?
  • Discovery: Is it new?
56
Q

Gerring’s criteria for a good argument (general, NOT causal)

A

BCCG PPRT

Boundedness: Scope conditions?

Coherence: How consistence is it?

Commensurability: How well does it cumulate with other theories?

Generality: How broad is its scope?

Parsimony: How concise is it? Number of assumptions?

Precise: Is it specific?

Relevance: Everyday importance?

Truth: Is it true?

57
Q

Gerring’s criteria for a good analysis

A

CAST Cumulation Accuracy Sampling Theoretical fit

58
Q

Criteria for a good analysis: Accuracy

A

Are the results (a) valid, (b) Reliable and ( c) accompanied by an estimate of uncertainty with respect to (d) internal validity and (e) external validity

59
Q

Criteria for a good analysis: Sampling

A

Are the chosen observations (a) representative of the population, (b) sufficiently large in number and (c) at the principal level of analysis?

60
Q

Criteria for a good analysis: Cumulation

A

(a) Is the research design standardized with other research? (b) Does it replicate current findings? (c) Is it transparent?

61
Q

Criteria for a good analysis: Theoretical fit

A

(a) Does the research design provide an appropriate test for the inference (construct validity)? (b) Is the test hard (severity)? (c) Is the test segregated from the argument under investigation (partition)?

Social Science Methodology (4 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions