Blackstone's Police Operational Hanbook Flashcards
What is the legislation/ offence for use of force?
Section 3 Criminal Law Act
What is the definition for use of force?
A person can use such force as in reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in effecting or assisting the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders or of persons unlawfully at large.
What is the legislation/ offence for arrest without a warrant?
Section 24 Police and Criminal Evidence Act
What is the definition for arrest without a warrant?
A constable may arrest without a warrant:-
(a) anyone who is about to commit an offence;
(b) anyone who is in fact committing an offence;
(c) anyone whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be about to commit an offence;
(d) anyone whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be committing an offence.
What is the legislation for impersonating a police officer?
Section 90 Police Act
What is the definition for impersonating a police officer?
Any person who with intent to deceive impersonates a member of a police force or special constable, or makes any statement or does any act calculated falsely to suggest that he is such a member or constable, shall be guilty of an offence.
What are the points to prove for impersonating a police officer?
- With intent to deceive a person
- Impersonates, or
- Makes a statement or does any act calculated falsely to suggest that they are
- A member of a police force, or
- A special constable
What is the legislation for poisoning - maliciously administering poison, with intent to injure, aggrieve, or annoy any other person?
Section 24 Offences Against the Persons Act 1861
What is the definition for poisoning - maliciously administering poison, with intent to injure, aggrieve, or annoy any other person?
Whoever shall unlawfully and maliciously administer to or cause to be administered to or taken by any other person any poison or other destructive or noxious thing, with intent to injure, aggrieve, or annoy such person, shall be guilty of an offence.
What are the points to prove for poisoning - maliciously administering poison, with intent to injure, aggrieve, or annoy any other person?
- A person
- unlawfully and Maliciously
- Administer to or cause to be administered to or
- Taken by any other person
- Any poison or other destructive or noxious thing
- With intent
- To injure, aggrieve, or annoy
What is the legislation for child neglect?
Section 1 Children and Young Persons Act 1933
What is the definition for child neglect?
If any person who has attained the age of sixteen years and has responsibility for any child or young person under that age, wilfully assaults, ill-treats, neglects, abandons, or exposes him, or causes or produces him to be assaulted, ill-treated, neglected, abandoned, or exposed, in a manner likely to cause him unnecessary suffering or injury to health, that person shall be guilty of an offence.
What are the points to prove for child neglect?
- Being a person 16 years or over
- Had responsibility
- For a child under 14/ young person under 16
- Wilfully
- Assaulted/ ill-treated/ neglected/ abandoned/ exposed the child/ young person or caused/ procured the child/ young person to be assaulted/ ill-treated
- In a manner likely to
- Cause unnecessary suffering/ injury to health
What is the legislation for threats to kill?
Section 16 Offences Against the Persons Act 1861
What is the definition for threats to kill?
A person who without lawful excuse makes to another a threat intending that the other would fear it would be carried out to kill that other or a third person shall be guilty of an offence.
What are the points to prove for threats to kill?
- Without lawful excuse
- Made threats to kill
- Intending to cause fear threat would be carried out
What is the legislation for blackmail?
Section 21 Theft Act 1968
What is the definition for blackmail?
A person is guilty of blackmail if, with a view to gain for himself or another or with intent to cause loss to another, he makes any unwarranted demand with menaces; and for this purpose a demand with menaces is unwarranted unless the person making it does so in belief -
(a) that he has reasonable grounds for making the demands
(b) that the use of the menaces is a proper means of reinforcing the demand.
(2) The nature of the act or omission demanded is immaterial, and it is also immaterial whether the menaces relate to action to be taken by the person making the demand.
What are the points to prove for blackmail?
- With a view to gain for themselves or another or with intent to cause loss to another,
- Makes any unwarranted demand with menaces
What is the legislation for arson?
Section 1 (3) Criminal Damage Act 1971
What is the definition for arson?
An offence is committed under this section by destroying or damaging property by fire shall be guilty of an offence.
What are the points to prove for arson?
- Without lawful excuse
- Destroyed/ damaged
- By fire
- Property with intent to destroy/ damage it
OR
-Being reckless as to whether such property was damaged/ destroyed
What is the legislation for threats to damage property?
Section 2 Criminal Damage Act 1971
What is the definition for threats to damage property?
A person who without lawful excuse makes to another a threat intending that the other would fear it would be carried out -
(a) to destroy or damage any property belonging to that other or a third party
(b) to destroy or damage his own property in a way which he knows is likely to endanger the life of that other or a third person is guilty of an offence.
What are the points to prove for threats to damage property?
Belonging to other/ third party
- Without lawful excuse
- Threatened to destroy/ damage property to a person
- Intending
- A person would fear that the threat would be carried out
Damage own property to endanger life
- Without lawful excuse
- Threatened to destroy/ damage
- Own property
- In a way you knew
- Was likely to endanger life of another
- Intending a person would fear threat would be carried out.
What is the legislation for perverting the course of justice?
Common Law
What is the definition for perverting the course of justice?
This offense is committed where a person or persons -
(a) does an act (positive act or series of acts); mere inaction is insufficient
(b) which has a tendency to pervert; and
(c) which is intended to pervert, and
(d) which is intended to pervert the course of public justice
What are the points to prove for perverting the course of justice?
- Does an act (positive act or series of acts); mere inaction is insufficient
- Which has a tendency to pervert; and
- Which is intended to pervert, and
- Which is intended to pervert the course of public justice
What is the legislation for the cultivation of cannabis?
Section 6 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971
What is the definition for the cultivation of cannabis?
A person shall be guilty of an offence if they shall not lawfully cultivate cannabis.
What is the legislation for a constable to search a person for drugs?
Section 23 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971
What is the definition for a constable to search a person for drugs?
If a constable has reasonable grounds to suspect that a person is in possession of a controlled drug, the constable may:
- Search that person and detain them for the purpose of the search
- Search any vehicle or vessel
- Seize and detain anything found which appears to be evidence in relation to the offence.
A person also commits an offence if he -
A) Intentionally obstructs
B) Conceals
What are the points to prove for a constable to search a person for drugs?
- Conceals from constable/ authorised person
- Without lawful authority or reasonable excuse
- Failed to produce book/ document
- Relating to dealings in production/ supply
- Of controlled drug
- When so demanded by
- A constable/ authorised person or
- Intentionally obstructed a person in the exercise of their powers under this section.
What is the legislation for assault by penetration of a person aged 13 or over?
Section 2 Sexual Offences Act 2003
What is the definition for assault by penetration of a person aged 13 or over?
A person commits an offence is -
(a) he intentionally penetrates the anus or vagina of another person with a part of his body or anything else,
(b) the penetration is sexual,
(c) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(d) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
What are the points to prove for assault by penetration of a person aged 13 or over?
- intentionally
- sexually penetrated
- anus/ vagina of a girl aged 13/ 14/ 15/ a woman
OR
- the anus of a boy aged 13/ 14/ 15/ a man
- with a part of the body and/ or a thing
- without consent
AND
-and reasonably believing the she/ he consented.
What is the legislation for assault by penetration of a child under 13?
Section 6 Sexual Offences Act 2003
What is the definition for assault by penetration of a child under 13?
A person commits an offence is -
(a) he intentionally penetrates the anus or vagina of another person with a part of his body or anything else,
(b) the penetration is sexual, and
(c) the other person is under 13
What are the points to prove for assault by penetration of a child under 13?
- intentionally
- sexually penetrates
- vagina/ anus
- part of his body/ anything else
- person under 13
What is the legislation for cause/ incite a child under 16 to engage in a sexual activity?
Section 10 Sexual Offences Act
What is the legislation for cause/ incite a child under 13 to engage in a sexual activity?
Section 8 Sexual Offences Act
What is the legislation for meeting a child following sexual grooming?
Section 15 Sexual Offences Act
What is the definition for meeting a child following sexual grooming?
A person aged 18 or over (A) commits an offence if:
(i) intentionally meets B, or
(ii) travels with the intention of meeting B in any part of the world,
(b) at the time, he intends to do anything to or in respect of B, during or after the meeting and in any part of the world, which if done will involve the commission by A of a relevant offence,
(c) B is under 16, and
(d) A does not reasonably believe that B is 16 or over.
What are the points to prove for meeting a child following sexual grooming?
- defendant aged 18 or over
- having on at least two earlier occasions
- met/ communicated with a girl/ boy aged under 16
- did not reasonably believe was 16 years or over
- intentionally met her/ him or
- travelled with the intention of meeting her/ him or
- arranged to meet him/ her
- she/ he travels to meet defendant
- and at any time intended to do anything/ to/ in respect of him/ her
- during/ after the meeting and in any part of the world
- which if done would have involved the commission by the defendant of a relevant offence.
What is the legislation for take, make, distribute, publish, indecent photographs of a person under 18?
Section 1 Protection of Children’s Act 1978
What is the definition for take, make, distribute, publish, indecent photographs of a person under 18?
Subject to sections 1A and 1B (defences), it is an offence for a person -
(a) to take, or permit to be taken, or to make, any indecent photograph or pseudo-photograph of a child; or
(b) to distribute or show such indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs; or
(c) to have in his possession such indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs, with a view to their being distributed or shown by himself or others; or
(d) to publish or cause to be published any advertisement likely to be understood as conveying that the advertiser distributes or show such indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs or intends to do so.
What are the points to prove for take, make, distribute, publish, indecent photographs of a person under 18?
- took/ permitted to be taken or
- distributed/ showed or
- had in his possession with a view to their being distributed or shown by himself or others or
- Indecent photo(s)/ pseudo-photograph(s)
- of a child/ children (person under age of 18)
OR
-Published/ caused to be published any advertisement likely to be understood as conveying that the advertiser distributes or shows such indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs, or intends to do so.
What is the legislation for voyeurism?
Section 67 Sexual Offences Act 2003
What is the definition for voyeurism?
(1) A person commits an offence if -
(a) for the purpose of sexual gratification, he observes another person doing a private act, and
(b) he knows that the other person does not consent to being observed for his sexual gratification.
(2) A person commits an offence if -
(a) he operates equipment beneath with intention of enabling another person to observe, for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification, a third (B) doing a private act, and
(b) he knows that B does not consent to his operating equipment with that intention.
(3) A person commits an offence if -
(a) he records another person (B) doing a private act,
(b) he does so with the intention that he or a third person will, for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification, look at an image of B doing the act, and
(c) he knows that B does not consent to his recording the act with that intention.
(4) A person commits an offence if he installs equipment or constructs or adapts a structure or part of a structure, with the intention of enabling himself or another person to commit and offence under subsection (1).
What are the points to prove for voyeurism?
Observing (S 67 (1))
- for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification
- observed another person
- doing a private act
- knowing that the person
- does not consent to being observed
- for the defendants sexual gratification
Operating equipment to observe (S 67 (2))
- operated equipment
- with the intention of enabling another person
- for the purpose of sexual gratification
- observing a third person doing a private act
- knowing that person does not consent
- to defendant operating equipment with that intention
Recording a private act (S 67 (3))
- recording another person doing a private act
- with the intention that
- defendant or third party
- would for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification
- look at an image of that person doing the act
- knowing that the other person does not consent
- to the defendant recording the act with that intention
Install equipment/ construct/ adapt a structure (S 67 (4))
- installed equipment or
- constructed/ adapted a structure/ part of a structure
- with intent
- to enable defendant or third person
- to commit an offence under S 67 (1)
What is the legislation for sexual activity in a public lavatory?
Section 71 Sexual Offences Act 2003
What is the definition for
A person commits an offence if -
(a) he is in a lavatory to which the public or a section of the public has or is permitted to have access, whether on a payment or otherwise,
(b) he intentionally engages in a sexual activity, and,
(c) the activity is sexual.
What are the points to prove for
- being in a lavatory
- to which the public/ a section of the public
- have/ are permitted to have access
- whether on a payment/ otherwise
- intentionally
- engaged in a sexual activity
What is the legislation for administer substance intending to commit a sexual offence?
Section 61 (1) Sexual Offences Act 2003
What is the definition for administer substance intending to commit a sexual offence?
A person commits an offence if he intentionally administers a substance to, or cause a substance to be taken by, another person (B) -
(a) knowing that B does not consent, and
(b) with the intention of stupefying or overpowering B, so as to enable any person to engage in a sexual activity that involves B.
What are the points to prove for administer substance intending to commit a sexual offence?
- intentionally
- administered a substance to or
- caused a substance to be taken by
- another person
- knowing that s/he did not consent
- with intention of stupefying/ overpowering
- so as to enable any person
- to engage in a sexual activity involving victim.
What is the legislation for use of words/ behaviours or display of written material (racial)?
Section 18 Public Order Act 1986
What is the definition for use of words/ behaviours or display of written material (racial)?
A person who uses threatening, abusive, insulting words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, abusive, insulting, is guilty of an offence if -
(a) he intends thereby to stir up racial hatred, or
(b) having regard to all the circumstances racial hatred is likely to be stirred up thereby.