Biz Orgs Flashcards

1
Q

What are the three requirements for an agency relationship?

A

1) Mutual manifestation of assent;
2) Agent acting on behalf of the Principal; and
3) Understanding that the agent is subject to control of the Principal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Does agency require consideration or a formal agreement?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Does intent matter in forming agency?

A

No, it can be proved by circumstantial evidence. Look at what level of control one had over the other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the key premise or rule of agency?

A

That the agent has the power to bind the principal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In determining agency, how is manifestation analyzed?

A

Using an objective standard of the reasonable person.
NOTE: Non verbal assent is OK (e.g., someone nods head).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the three types of principles and under which is an agent liable?

A

o Disclosed Principals: exists when a 3rd party knows that A is acting for P
o Partially disclosed/ unidentified = exists when a 3rd party knows A is an agent for someone but does not know who P is
o Undisclosed = T thinks A is dealing for him or herself

Agent is liable in both partially disclosed and undisclosed. An agent that makes a contract on behalf of a partially disclosed or undisclosed principal is a party to the contact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the two types of agency authority?

A

Actual (express or implied) and Apparent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is implied actual authority?

A

What agent reasonably believes from the circumstances including authority to do acts that are implied through the words, defined by custom, defined by past conduct, or are reasonably necessary [incidental] to accomplish it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is apparent authority?

A

Where the Principal (not the agent) has caused the third party to reasonably believe the Agent has actual authority

NOTE: Marital status does not prove an agency relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When is the principle liable for the acts of the agent?

A

Under actual authority, and under apparent authority (e.g., disclosed or partially disclosed Principal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In the case of an agent’s fraud (e.g., wearing a fake badge for Home Depot) is Home Depot bound?

A

No, this would be the agent’s fraud.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is ratification?

A

When someone affirms a prior act done by a purported agent where the act is given affirmance by the now principle as if the agent had actual authority.

NOTE: Ratification is a means by which the P can say “my agent did NOT have the right to enter into this K, but I am glad she did so. Accordingly, I’ll affirm the transaction and agree to be bound by the K”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the two elements of ratification?

A

1) The person accepts the results with the intent to ratify; AND
2) The person has an understanding of the material facts.

NOTE: The person here is the principle.

NOTE: Mere acceptance of benefits, without more, does not prove ratification of an agreement.

NOTE: You can ratify by silence if facts show you had intent to ratify and knew all the facts (called ratification by acquiescence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Under ratification, what is the effective date of the agency relationship?

A

Date of contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Can you ratify part of a transaction?

A

No. It is all or nothing.

NOTE: Under old rule, an undisclosed P could not ratify a transaction. Under the new rule, an undisclosed P can be bound by a ratification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the material circumstances principle in ratification?

A

That the third party cannot be bound by ratification if the circumstances have materially changed in a way that hurts the third party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is agency by estoppel?

A

An equitable principle that the principal is estopped (legally prevented) from denying that the third party was their agent if they were complicit in giving the third party the impression that they were a valid and officially authorized agent of the principal.
NOTE: This includes a company not exercising reasonable care in preventing the occurrence of the incident.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are the three elements to agency by estoppel?

A
  1. Defendant principal intentionally or negligently creates an appearance of authority in the purported Agent
    (2) The third party reasonably, and in good faith, acts in reliance on that appearance of authority; AND
    (3) The third party detrimentally changes their position in reliance on the appearance of authority.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What duties does an agent owe to his principal?

A

Duty of care and
Duty of loyalty and
Duty of disclosure (to disclose all matters pertinent to the principals business)

E.g, Agent has duty not to make secret profits in connection with their work for P. If A does so, A must give profits to P.
E.g., cannot take customer lists (keep confidential info lasts forever)

NOTE: Special skills acquired on the job, agent can take with them
NOTE: Exception to all duties is Principal’s consent and Agent discloses all material facts
NOTE: On damages, P does not need to have suffered any loss. Can recoup lost profits (discouragement)
NOTE: Cashing in on fame is not a breach of duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the main difference between having the right and the power in agency law?

A

Having the right to do something means you necessarily have the power.
Having the power to do something does not mean you have the right; you could be acting outside of scope and breaching fiduciary duties but you had the power to carry it out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

The general rule is that an agent or principal can terminate an agency relationship at any time. What is the exception?

A

Detrimental Reliance
When the principal or agent has changed their position upon reliance of the relationship CANNOT terminate (even in a gratuitous relationship).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What happens with actual and apparent authority when an agency relationship is terminated?

A
  • Actual authority ends
  • Apparent authority may end (depends on what third party would reasonably believe)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What happens when an agent or principal dies, goes bankrupt or is declared mentally incapacitated?

A

Relationship immediately terminated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Does fiduciary duty survive termination of an agency relationship?

A

Yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Which law defines partnership?

A

The Uniform Partnership Act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

How does the Uniform Partnership Act define partnership?

A

The Uniform Partnership Act defines partnership as “An association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a business for profit.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What are the two things present in every partnership case?

A

Shared control, and shared profits and losses. When both are present, a partnership is likely; however, other factors should also be assessed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What are the 9 factors for determining a partnership and what is the opening sentence to use? What is the mnemonic?

A

Someone I Loved Can’t Return
A determination of whether a partnership exists requires an examination and balancing test of the totality of the circumstances in a given case. These include nine factors:

The mnemonic is S cubed, I, L squared, C squared, R

  1. Share in profits (law assumes split equally unless specified otherwise in agreement)
  2. Share in losses (law assumes split equally unless specified otherwise in agreement. Thus, if one party indemnifies a other, this weighs toward no partnership
  3. Share in ownership and control of the partnership property and the business (law assumes shared equally unless otherwise specified. Who owned the capital that went in? who controls the business?)
  4. Intent (determined from statements and conduct)
  5. Language of the agreement (is agreement called “Partnership Agreement” or just “Agreement”?
  6. Length of agreement (partnership agreements typically run for indefinite terms. Thus, the more finite the term, the less likely there is a partnership.
  7. Conduct toward third parties (did parties file partnership income tax returns? Did only one party file partnership income tax returns?)
  8. Community of Power in Administration
  9. Rights of the parties upon dissolution (did one party not have the rights to share in capital upon dissolution)?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What does sharing in the profits do under the law? And what are the 7 instances under which the prima facia presumption does not apply?

A

Under the Uniform Partnership Act, sharing of profits creates a prima facie presumption of partnership UNLESS the profits were received for:
- a joint tenancy/property
- a debt
- compensation
- rent
- annuity or other retirement benefit
- interest on a loan
- sale of goodwill on a business…
in which case no prima facie presumption is established and one must look at other factors.

NOTE: This means that even if you get compensation money, or rent money, you can STILL be a partner, it just kills the presumption of partnership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Why do creditors not want to be partners with the company they made a loan to?

A

Because if they are a partner they are liable for all of the partnership’s debts.

NOTE: Veto power only gives creditors option to protect against bad investments but no authority to make good ones. Creditors have no authority to initiate transactions on behalf of the partnership nor do their actions bind the partnership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What is the case on creditors not considered partners?

A

Martin v. Peyton (partnership was not created)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What is partnership by estoppel?

A

An equitable doctrine in which a partnership is created by law when a person holds him or herself out as a partner and a third party detrimentally relies on the representation. The Defendant is estopped or precluded from denying the partnership.

c. Elements of Partnership by Estoppel
i. A representation of partnership with one or more persons who are not partners in fact; AND
ii. Plaintiff’s reliance on the representation of partnership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What is the fiduciary duty owed to joint venturers?

A

Joint adventures, like copartners, owe to one another the duty of the finest loyalty. In other words, share with your fellow joint venturer the opportunities you come across so long as the opportunity arises from the joint venture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What are the four elements for a business to constitute a joint venture?

A

An Agreement Considers Partners

  1. Express or implied agreement to form a JV;
  2. Express or implied agreement for the sharing of profits and (usually but not necessary), losses.
  3. Contribution by each party (though not necessarily in equal parts) of financial resources, property, time, skills, etc., in a common undertaking;
  4. A proprietary interest and right of mutual control over the property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What is the case on duty of joint venturers to each other?

A

Meinhard v. Salmon where Salmon should have shared the opportunity with Meinhard as if a partner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

How is a joint venture defined?

A

A limited purpose partnership that is shorter in duration than a partnership and has a more narrow purpose than a partnership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What is the quote to include if a joint venture question is given and who said it and in which case?

A

In Meinhard v. Salmon, Justice Cardozo concluded that, “Joint adventures, like copartners, owe to one another, while the enterprise continues, the duty of the finest loyalty . . . Not honesty alone, but the punctilio of an honor the most sensitive, is the standard of behavior.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Under the Uniform Partnership Act, what provisions cannot be changed?

A

[[INSERT FROM 105 c and 105 d]]

  • Rules that affect third party rights cannot be changed
    (e.g., a rule on payment of debts cannot be changed because this would impact a third party)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What are the three equal rights in partnership unless otherwise specified in the agreement?

A

Equal share in profits
Equal share in losses
Equal share in control rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What loyalties do partners in a partnership owe each other?

A
  • Not competing with the firm
  • Duty of disclosure

Case is Meehan v. Shaughnessy - where lawyers took customer lists and employees with them to the new firm

NOTE: Associates of a law firm are agents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What are the three ways to identify property as partnership property?

A

1) Purchased with partnership assets
2) Transferred to a person with indication of their capacity as a partner
3) The existence of a partnership (but without the name of the partnership)

NOTE: Property acquired in the name of a partner, without any indication of the partnership or that the person is a partner, and without use of partnership assets, is presumed to be individual/separate property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What are the two consequences of a partner filing for bankruptcy?

A

1) Creation of a bankruptcy estate; and
2) Dissolution of the partnership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Assume 3 partners, A, B, and C. A puts in 90% of capital, and B and C put in 5% each. They all work equal amounts. They make $100K in profit. How do they split the profits?

A

All profits split equally (unless agreement states otherwise) irrespective of how much work or capital someone put in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Under the UPA, upon dissolution of a partnership, partnership property is used to pay off liabilities in what order?

A
  1. Outside/third party creditors
  2. Partners for contributions that are not capital or profits related
  3. Partners for capital contributions
  4. Partners for profit-related debts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

How are decisions on ordinary matters (usual course of business) decided?

A

By a majority vote of partner (e.g., hiring or firing an employee related to the business)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

How are decisions extraordinary matters (outside usual course of business) decided?

A

By a unanimous vote of partners.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

What is the rule regarding the partners binding each other to contracts?

A

In a general partnership with two partners, each party has the power to bind the partnership in matters pertaining to the ordinary course of the partnership’s business.
However, if a contract is entered into by a partner who lacks authority and the third party knows the partner lacks authority, then the contract does NOT bind the partnership. [like as if vendor had notice of dissolution]

NOTE: One partner cannot restrict the powers of another partner for a matter in the course of ordinary business (e.g., write letter to vendor saying don’t sell bread to my fellow partner and they run a grocery store).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Define breach of fiduciary duty and what are the fiduciary duties of a partnership?

A

A breach of fiduciary duty occurs when one partner advantages himself at the expense of the firm.

Fiduciary duties include the duty to:

Act honestly toward other partners and for the benefit of the other partners.

Not compete nor make any unauthorized profit

Disclose material information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

When does a third party lose its ability to bind you to a contract?

A

For two years after dissolution unless partnership files a notice of dissolution with the Secretary of State which will then put the third party on constructive notice after the passing of 90 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

What is the old and new UPA rule on what happens to a partnership when a partner dissociates?

A

Under the old UPA, if a partner dissociated from the partnership, the partnership dissolved.
Under the new UPA, if a partner dissociates, the partnership is NOT automatically dissolved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

What should a partner do when he dissociates?

A

Optionally file a statement of dissociation with the Secretary of State. This document limits the power to bind the dissociated partner and the personal liability following potential dissolution. The filing serves as constructive notice. After 90 days it becomes constructive notice of the facts it contains
-For the first 90 days there is no protection so reach out and notify vendors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

What are the 7 ways in which a partner dissociates from a partnership?

A
  1. Notice of partner’s express will to quit
  2. Event in partnership agreement specified as to trigger dissociation occurs.
  3. Expulsion of partner.
  4. Unanimous vote + unlawful to carry out business with partner, transfer of partner’s interest, entity was partner and dissolved, or person was an unincorporated entity that dissolved
  5. Partner expelled by judicial notice (e.g., wrongful conduct, willful breach of agreement)
  6. Partner bankrupt
  7. Partner dies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

When is dissociation wrongful?

A
  • Breach of partnership agreement
  • In a partnership for specific undertaking or term, if partner dissociates prior to completion of term or undertaking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

What are the two consequences of wrongful dissociation?

A
  • Liable to the other partners for damages
  • Liable for existing debts of the partnership even though they wrongfully “bailed out”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

What are the 9 ways a partnership is dissolved?

A
  1. Death of partner + w/i90 days consent/vote of at least half of remaining partners to dissolve business
  2. Fixed term partnership or goal specific partnership where complete
  3. Fixed term partnership where partners decide to wind it up
  4. Fixed term partnership with a wrongful dissociation and half of remaining partners or more vote to dissolve
  5. Received notice under partnership at will for partner rightful dissociation
  6. Inability to carry out obligations created by the partnership agreement
  7. Court order (e.g., unlawful business, not reasonable to carry on partnership, partnership does not have at least two partners)
  8. Only able to carry business at a loss
  9. Insanity of a partner (?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

What happens when the partnership dissolves? Is the partnership terminated?

A

The winding up of the business during which partners pay off creditors and wind and partners share in profits and losses. The partnership is not terminated until after the winding up of the partnership is complete.

NOTE: Judicial dissolution terminates the partnership immediately.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

What is the order of priority in paying liabilities upon dissolution of a general partnership?

A
  • Pay creditors (inside and outside creditors)
  • Return capital
  • Share profits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

What are the three occasions in which judicial dissolution may occur?

A

On application by a partner by a judicial decree that:

  1. The economic purpose of the partnership is likely to be reasonably frustrated
  2. Another partner has engaged in conduct relating to the partnership business that makes it not reasonably practicable to carry on the business with that partner
  3. It is not otherwise reasonably practicable to carry on the partnership business in conformity with the partnership agreement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

What is the rule on losses when one partner contributes only capital and the other partner contributes only labor?

A

The general rule on partnerships is that losses are to be shared equally unless otherwise specified in the partnership agreement. However, in the situation described above, where one partner or joint adventurer contributes the money capital and the other contributes the skill and labor, neither party is liable to the other for contribution for any loss sustained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

What are three advantages to a general partnership (GP)?

A
  1. No registration requirements
  2. Tax advantage in that partnership is not taxed just your income as a partner is taxed
  3. Flexibility in that you can define agreement as you would like so long as it is not an immutable rule (e.g., adversely impacting third party rights)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

What is the biggest disadvantage to a general partnership (GP)?

A

The partners are all individually and jointly liable for the debts of the partnership performed in furtherance of the business.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

What is the solution to the unlimited liability associated with a general partnership?

A

A LP - limited partnership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

Did partnerships or LPs exist in the Common Law?

A

General partnerships did exist in the Common Law. LPs did not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

What are the two different kinds of partners in a limited partnership?

A

A general partner and a limited partner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

How is a general partner characterized in a limited partnership?

A

General partners in a limited partnership
1) Run and manage the business
2) Have unlimited personal liability for the organization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

How is a limited partner characterized in a limited partnership?

A

Typically do NOT partake in managing the company.
Are not personally liable for acts of partnership.
Risk is only that of losing their investment in the LP.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

What was the policy rationale in creating Limited Partnerships?

A

Encourage people to invest by removing their personal liability to a partnerships liabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

What is a limited liability partnership or a LLP?

A

Like a LP but the general partner AND the limited partner BOTH do NOT face personal liability for the debts of the LLP.

NOTE: It is like a magical solution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

What professions typically form LLPs?

A

Anyone can form an LLP, however some states only people in certain professions can file for an LLP

CA rule: ONLY lawyers, accountants and architects can become LLPs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

What is the hurdle to forming a limited liability partnership?

A

May need to establish financial security by:
o Insurance
o a bond or
o meeting a net worth requirement (CA has a net worth requirement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

When is registration required?

A

For forming a limited partnership or a limited liability partnership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

What is the registration drawback to the LLP?

A

Must renew LLP registration every year in states OTHER THAN LLP
If forget, lose LLP shield and have formed a general partnership on default

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

What is the one difference in the Limited liability limited partnership (LLLP)?

A

LLLP is the ultimate extension of all the liability limiting exceptions.

No liability for general and limited partners (same as LLP) but NOT restricted to only some professions

NOTE: Some states do not recognize LLLPs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

What does LLC stand for?

A

limited liability company

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
75
Q

What is a LLC?

A

An LLC is an unincorporated business association who provides its owners/members with limited liability and allows them to participate in managing the enterprise without risking any loss of that limited liability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
76
Q

What is the difference between a LLC and a partnership?

A

Unlike partnerships LLCs have limited liability for all their members.

Also, several corporate laws apply to LLCs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
77
Q

What is an advantage to the LLC?

A

There is no double taxation. LLCs can choose between being taxed as a partnership or as a company.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
78
Q

How is a corporation defined?

A

A business that is a legal entity and shares in the profits of the business but whose owners are not personally liable for any debts or losses of the business.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
79
Q

What are four benefits to forming a corporation?

A
  1. Limited liability (e.g., in tort cases, P can only sue corporate entity unless they can pierce the corporate veil)
  2. Tax benefit: Corporations do not have to distribute all of their income; income can be reinvested in the business; however business taxes have to be paid on earnings and income is taxed against at personal income tax level
  3. Benefits: Employees receive benefit plans (partnerships cannot do this)
  4. Safe (Board meetings, a lot of governance, organization)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
80
Q

What are the three steps to forming a corporation?

A
  1. Draft articles of incorporation that include requirement components
  2. Deliver articles of incorporation to the Secretary of State and receive copy
  3. Secretary of State accepts articles and this is point at time at which corporation is born.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
81
Q

What must the articles of incorporation contain?

A
  • The corporation’s name
    (and some word indicating business is incorporated (ie. “inc.).
  • The max # of shares the corporation is authorized to issue
  • Names of corporation’s registered agent
  • Address of registered office (must be located within the state of incorporation)
  • Name and address of each incorporator
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
82
Q

What MAY the articles of incorporation include?

A
  • Purpose of business
  • Classes and number of shares of different classes of stock
83
Q

What is the three step process to amend the Articles of Incorporation?

A

(1) Board must recommend the amendment to the shareholders.
(2) Shareholders MUST VOTE TO APPROVE the amendment.
(3) Amendment must be filed with Secretary of State’s office

84
Q

What are bylaws?

A

The rules that a corporation adopts to govern its internal affairs.

85
Q

What do bylaws typically deal with?

A

Board committees, qualifications of directors, notice requirements for shareholder meetings

86
Q

Who can amend the bylaws?

A

Incorporators or directors can amend or change bylaws but once shareholders pay stock, only shareholders can amend/change the bylaws.

NOTE: Bylaws are not filed with the state government, they are not public record and are more easy to amend than articles of incorporation

87
Q

What is the hierarchy of statute, articles of incorporation and bylaws?

A

Statute trumps articles of incorporation which trumps bylaws.

88
Q

What is the most influential body of business law in the United States?

A

Delaware is the most influential business body of law in the USA

89
Q

What is the Internal Affairs Doctrine?

A

The law of the state of incorporation governs a corporation’s internal decisions and actions. Does not matter where the corporation does business or is HQ–Court will apply Delaware law IF the corporation is incorporated in Delaware or CA law if incorporated in CA.

90
Q

What is the benefit to owning a corporation?

A

Protection by the corporate veil.

91
Q

What are the rules that apply to Board members?

A
  • They are collectively the Principal of the organization
  • They are not agents
  • They are elected by the shareholders
  • Their duty is to the corporation
  • They are not subjected to the corporation’s control, rather the corporation is subject to the Board’s control
  • Acting as a GROUP, the members can bind the corporation. Acting individually they have less power aka they cannot demand documents from the offices.
92
Q

What is the rule on officers and a corporation?

A

They are agents of the corporation.

93
Q

How do companies handle the duty of care?

A

Delaware allows corps to limit the liability of directors for a breach of duty of care
BUT this must be in Certificate of Incorporation.

94
Q

What are the policy rationales for limited liability?

A
  • Encourages Investment (if investors liable, would deter investment)
  • Encourage Management (managers would be less willing to manage if they were liable)
  • Makes Economy More Efficient (corporations controls investment with its expertise, can diversify investments which reduces risk on investment; separation of function where some people have the money and others have the expertise
95
Q

What is a promoter?

A

Someone who purports to act as an agent of the business prior to its incorporation (e.g., sign contracts in name of corp when there is no corp)

96
Q

If a promoter cannot successfully argue for a corporation’s existence what is the default?

A

Promoter is liable.

97
Q

If a purported officer cannot successfully argue for a corporation by estoppel or for a de facto corporation, what happens?

A

They are held to the standard of a general partnership in which all partners personally liable.

98
Q

What are the two legal issues in promoter liability?

A
  1. Is the promoter liable on the contract?
  2. Is the corporation liable on the contract?
99
Q

When is a promoter personally liable?

A

All persons purporting to act as or on behalf of a corp, knowing there was no incorporation are liable.

NOTE: Delaware imposes a presumption that the promoter is liable.

100
Q

How does a promoter rebut the presumption of their liability under Delaware common law? What are the three elements?

A

Show that the third party:
i. Knew the corporation does not yet exist, AND
ii. Agreed to look solely to the corporation (when and if formed) for performance, AND
iii. All of this must be unambiguous.

101
Q

For legal issue #2, does the corporation become liable under the contract?

A

Yes, but not automatically. The corp must “adopt” the contract.

Adoption can be
a. Express (typically by a novation); or
b. Implied (e.g., ratification by acceptance of benefits)

NOTE: Even if corporation adopts the contract, the promoter remains liable as a guarantor unless the third party releases the promoter. Thus, if you sign contract for company when it is not in existence, there is a lifetime guarantee on that contract.

102
Q

How can one make themselves personally liable when attempting to sign a corporation’s documents?

A

i. The “right” way for a corporation to sign a document is:
1. XYZ Corporation,
a. By: Mona (agent’s signature and printed)
b. Title:
c. Date:
ii. Wrong way is to handwrite without a signature and not using the word “By” or putting your name down twice (might make it seem you are trying to guarantee it personally)
1. This makes you personally liable
iii. Bottom line – do not deviate from the standard form

103
Q

If a company is not correctly incorporated, limited liability will not apply (and default is general partnership). Thus, what two defenses can the defendant raise to ensure limited liability protection under the cloak of an incorporation?

A

First, de facto corporation.
Second, corporation by estoppel.

NOTE: You can raise BOTH of these defenses in a contract case. But in a tort case, you can only raise de facto.

104
Q

What are the four elements for a Corporation by Estoppel?

A

i. An entity acted like a corporation;
ii. Does business under a corporate name;
iii. A third party reasonably believes she was dealing with a corporation; and
iv. Unjust to let third party recover from owners of a firm individually (basic fairness/equity requirement)

NOTE: a. Argument for Defendant
b. Defendant may be a promoter and does NOT want to be liable so raises corporation defense – either corporation by estoppel or de facto if true efforts to organize
c. Precludes the Plaintiff for going after individual liability; D raises this as a defense to protect his assets; there was reasonable reliance on a corporation
d. You never want your incorporation to be defective because you are personally liable if things go wrong, so defendant argues corporation by estoppel – they thought they were dealing with a company and it would be unfair to hold differently

105
Q

What are the three elements to a de facto corporation?

A

i. Valid incorporation statute;
ii. Good faith effort to incorporate; and
iii. Evidence that organizers acted as a corporation.

a. Argument for Defendant – plead it along with a defense of corporation by estoppel so that you can protect your individual assets
b. Defendant may be a promoter
c. Looks at actions of incorporator
d. For example, D does not want to be thought of as in a general partnership which is the default for ineffective incorporation (!!) b/c personally liable, so argues for de facto corporation
e. Defined: corporation by fact but not necessarily by law
f. Implication – D is not liable, only company is liable
g. NOTE: If the above factors are fulfilled, a corporation (or LLC) instantly comes into being (even before government has filed papers)
h. Thus, entity must be treated like a corporation by everyone except the State

106
Q

What is the case on the rationale for the Doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil?

A

This is differentiated from In re: International Cab Company, where the court found that the corporate veil could not be pierced to add the company’s CEO and his other company (National) to the list of Defendants, because the plaintiff did not successfully establish the elements of the alter ego doctrine.

107
Q

Does the Piercing the Corporate Veil Doctrine apply to public or a close corporation?

A

It does NOT apply to a public corporation and has never been done.

108
Q

How many prongs are in the Doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil and what are they?

A

Two prongs - both must be fulfilled in order to pierce the corporate veil.

The first prong is the Unity of Interest prong where there is such unity of interest and ownership that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individual no longer exist.

The second prong is the Prevention of Fraud and Misjustice prong where adherence to the fiction of separate corporate existence would sanction a fraud or promote injustice.

109
Q

Under the Unity of Interest prong, what 6 factors do the courts assess under a balancing test?

A
  1. Domination & Control
    (appears that 1 or 2 shareholders are calling all the shots to where the corporation is the alter ego of the individual because corporation does everything the individual wants).
  2. Disregard of Corporate Formalities
    (none or few meetings, no minutes, no shareholder meetings, etc.)
  3. Disregard of Economic Separateness
    (comingling of funds, using company funds for your own)
  4. Inadequate Capitalization
    (little assets and outstanding loans)
  5. Insolvency at the time of the Transaction
    (corporation was on the ropes at time of transaction)
  6. Siphoning of funds
    (corporation pays $30K to an officer who does $20K of work) (NOTE: That paying excess to a vendor is just a a bad deal not siphoning)
110
Q

What is the prevention of fraud and misjustice prong?

A

To prevail, a plaintiff must prove that respecting the corporate form will lead to an inequitable result.

Note: that a plaintiff does not have to prove all the elements of fraud. A showing of bad faith is enough.

111
Q

What is reverse piercing?

A

As stated, normal veil piercing occurs when the court decides to hold an individual shareholder liable for the debts of their company.

Reverse piercing is the opposite. There, the court allows a third-party creditor to reach corporate assets to satisfy claims against the individual shareholder.

NOTE:
Reverse piercing aims to first establish the liability of the individual shareholder, THEN reach inside to the assets of the corporation
- Usual case is an individual who owns 17 corporations and one of the corporations enters into a K with a CREDITOR and defaults

NOTE: The board owes a duty to the corporation’s creditors because it is a Delaware corporation and when it is nearing insolvency.

112
Q

What are the three theories of liability for a corporation?

A
  • Enterprise liability where all of the subsidiaries can be liable for the actions of one of them (e.g., impossible to know which subsidiary had asbestos that made P sick)
  • Respondeat Superior (agency law) where company is liable if the agent was acting in furtherance of the business
  • Disregard of the Corporate Entity (Piercing the Corporate Veil) where the defendant disregarded the separateness between himself and the corporation
113
Q

What is a partnership de jure?

A

A partnership by law.

NOTE: You do not need to intend to form a partnership but the court can find one.

114
Q

On corporate donations, does a statute created after the charter is put in place which does not authorize donations valid?

A

Yes, a state statute permitting corporate charitable donations applies retroactively to corporations whose charters were filed before the effective date of the statute.

115
Q

What is instrumental justification for corporate donations?

A

That is benefits the business in some way. This is not required. Note the other theory is morality per se where you donate because it is the moral/right thing to do.

Today, per New York business law, corporations have the power to make donations irrespective of corporate benefit.

NOTE that in Dodge v. Ford Motor, the reason why Ford was found liable is that in order to help humanity he stopped paying his shareholders dividend so he was actually causing them harm.

116
Q

What is the Duty of Care rule for corporations?

A

The duty of care is the Director’s obligation to act in good faith, for the corporation’s interests, and with the degree of care a reasonable director would exercise.

The duty of care focuses on the process–not the outcome. The process must be reasonable.

Even if in breach, both factual and proximate causation must be proved.

The Business Judgment rule protects Directors in offering its rebuttable presumption that the Directors acted with reasonable care.

Most directors are protected by breach of the duty of care claims given corporation’s charters contain an exculpation clause under 102(b)(7).

117
Q

Will courts entertain whether or not a Board should declare a dividend?

A

No. Unless fraud or bad faith is alleged, courts will not interfere with decisions on dividend payouts.

118
Q

Is negligence enough for the standard of a duty to care?

A

NO. Gross negligence is the standard.

119
Q

For a merger, who must approve?

A

Board and shareholders of BOTH companies

120
Q

What is the difference between the market price and the intrinsic value?

A
  • Market value is the share price times the number of shares outstanding
  • Intrinsic value is the value of assets minus liabilities
121
Q

Can a company opt out of the duty of care?

A

Yes so long as the company puts it in the charter up front.

122
Q

Can failure to act constitute a negligence claim? What is the catch?

A

Yes. However, in nonfeasance of a Director (failure to act), BJR does not apply because no decision was made by the Board, thus the standard is negligence for non feasance and stays at gross negligence for BJR.

123
Q

Who does the BJR apply to?

A

Board of Directors
Officers

124
Q

Who owes the duty of loyalty?

A

Directors and officers of the company.

125
Q

Who is the duty of loyalty and care owed to?

A

Only the corporation - NOT the shareholders.

126
Q

What are the three main ways one can breach the duty of loyalty?

A
  1. Self dealing
  2. Depriving the corporation of an opportunity that rightfully belonged to it
  3. Waste
127
Q

What is the Doctrine of Waste?

A

When a director or officer takes advantage of their position to overpay themselves or one of their friends.

128
Q

When does self-dealing occur?

A

When a director or officer makes a personal deal with the corporation (e.g., director or officer is on both sides of a transaction)
E.g., Director sells their property to company; Director would vote for company to buy his personal property and is now on both sides of the transaction
E.g., Director on 2 different boards which engage in transactions with one another

129
Q

Who are disinterested directors?

A

Directors who do NOT have a conflict.

130
Q

What are three ways to apply the Safe Harbor and prevent a self-dealing/interested director transaction from being void?

A
  1. Disclosure of all material facts and majority vote of disinterested directors; OR
  2. Disclosure of all material facts and vote of stockholders; OR
  3. Transaction is fair to the corporation at the time it was made.
131
Q

What remedy is available for self-dealing?

A

Equitable remedy - Corporation has a right to void transaction if they would like.
NO money damages available other than the D returning any gain they realized on the transaction

132
Q

Does the BJR protect against breach of loyalty?

A

No. Never. Only duty of care.

133
Q

Can both the duty of care and duty of loyalty be violated?

A

Yes. Board member is disloyal and engaging self-dealing while Board failed to act reasonably to put the company’s best interests first.

134
Q

What can a Board committee NOT do?

A
  • Approve a merger
  • Adopt, amend, or appeal a bylaw
135
Q

What is a stock?

A

A basic unit of ownership which entitles the owner of the stock to receive a share of profits

136
Q

What are three advantages to preferred (over common) stock?

A

Preferred stock holders enjoy a dividend preference (receive their dividend before holders of common stock do)

Preferred stock holders enjoy a liquidation preference in that they receive money from a liquidation before common stock holders do

Preferred stock holders enjoy better voting rights.

137
Q

What are preemptive rights?

A

Existing stockholders can buy stocks before those who are not shareholders

138
Q

What is a holding company and what is the benefit to setting one up?

A

A company which owns shares of different subsidiary businesses.

The benefit is to protect the assets of the parent/holding company; holding company/parent cannot be sued directly unless veil pierced through lack of separateness of subsidiary

NOTE: Each subsidiary is referred to as an operating company.

139
Q

What is leverage and what are the types of bonds?

A

Leverage is the debt of the corporation including debt owed to a bond holder

  • High yield bonds
  • Junk bonds – likely never see the money again, only collect interest
  • Convertible bonds – convertible into common stock
140
Q

What is an interested director transaction and what case demonstrates the theory?

A

a. Interested transactions involve a corporate insider being on both sides of a deal. Under the Common Law, such transactions were absolutely forbidden. However, courts will now permit interested transactions in two situations. The first is when the transaction was objectively fair to the corporation at the time it was entered into. The second is when the transaction was approved or ratified by a sufficient number of disinterested directors or the shareholders, provided that there was a full disclosure of material facts.
b. This is analogous to Benihana Tokyo, Inc., versus Benihana, Inc, in which the parent company sued the directors of the subsidiary under an interested director transaction theory (breach of duty of loyalty) because the Benihana, Inc., director was on both sides of the deal (on the Board of Benihana, Inc., and a director for BFC which purchased the preferred stock). The court found the directors were not liable under a safe harbor provision because a majority of the disinterested directors reasonably reviewed and approved.

141
Q

What is the policy rationale for the Corporate Opportunity Doctrine?

A

To deter misappropriation of new business that should rightfully belong to the corporation.

142
Q

What is the Corporate Opportunity Doctrine?

A

An officer or director breaches the duty of loyalty when:
1. Director of officer “usurps”/ wrongfully takes the opportunity for herself; AND
2. The opportunity should have been available to the corporation.

143
Q

When should the opportunity been available to the corporation? How many factors are in the balancing test?

A

Under the Delaware balancing test, the following four factors should be considered:

  1. First, did the corporation have the resources to take the opportunity?
  2. Second, was the opportunity within the corporation’s line of business? (e.g., scope)
  3. Third, did the corporation have an interest (e.g., legal right like an option or letter of intent) or expectancy (ordinary course of business) in the opportunity?
  4. Did/would the opportunity create a conflict of interest between the insider and the corporation? (e.g., if the opportunity is presented to the director in his individual capacity less indicative of a conflict of interest)

NOTE: No single factor is dispositive of a violation, court must balance all 4 factors

144
Q

What is the next step after the balancing test for whether the opportunity belonged to the corporation?

A

Determining whether the taking was wrongful.

145
Q

How do you determine whether the taking was wrongful?

A

A presumption applies that the if the opportunity belonged to the corporation then the taking WAS wrongful.
Up to D to rebut the presumption.
Only path to effective rebuttal is showing that the transaction was cleansed through a Safe Harbor

146
Q

What are the three ways to show a Safe Harbor applies?

A

Full disclose of all material factors plus that a majority of Disinterested directors either:
1. Approved the insider’s taking the opportunity; OR
2. Rejected the opportunity for the corporation; OR
3.Fairness - taking the opportunity was fair to the corporation at the time the insider took it

147
Q

What is the available remedy under the Corporate Opportunity Doctrine?

A

Director or officer has to give up their profit/ill-gotten gains and hold the funds in a trust for the corporation

148
Q

What is a tender offer?

A

A company wants another company’s shares and lines up the money to make the offer to the shareholders.

149
Q

What is an IPO?

A

An initial public offering in which the first sale of stock by a company is made to the public

150
Q

What is spinning?

A

Allocating hot IPOs to the personal brokerage accounts of your clients (when you are an investment banker, in order to get better deals / aka a bribe)

151
Q

Does a parent owe a fiduciary duty to its subsidiary?

A

Yes when there are parent-subsidiary dealings.

152
Q

How is self dealing defined in cases involving the parent self dealing at the detriment of the subsidiary?

A

Self-dealing occurs when the parent, by virtue of its domination of the subsidiary, causes the subsidiary to act in such a way that the parent receives something from the subsidiary to the exclusion of, and detriment to, the minority stockholders of the subsidiary (e.g., parent forces subsidiary to pay out so much in dividends and almost dissolves subsidiary and the parent gets a lot of cash from it and the minority stakeholders of subsidiary get nothing)

NOTE: Must assess improper motive (this is duty of loyalty case) and waste

TEST to use is INTRINSIC FAIRNESS test - was the transaction fair to the minority stakeholders of the subsidiary business

153
Q

What are three characteristics of a Close Corporation and describe each.

A
  1. Stockholders
    - Small in number
    - Active in day-to-day affairs
    - Directors ARE also shareholders (so directors are not independent guardians as usual corp structure)
  2. Jobs vs. dividends
    - Corp is often the main source of income for each stockholder
    - But payout is in the form of salary, not dividends
  3. Shares
    - Not liquid—no ready market to buy/sell shares
    - Shareholders are stuck where they are
154
Q

What are two issues in Close Corps and describe each.

A
  1. Planning for control where founders want to predetermine important parts of the deal among them such as sharing of power and compensation rights
  2. Abuse of control where the structure permits oppression of minority stockholders such as “freezing out” minority stockholders from participating in the firm and the rewards of the firm
155
Q

Describe the Donahue v. Rodd case in close corp (first case studied)

A
  • Context: P shareholder was not given the same option to sell at a certain price as that given to the Founder
  • Holding: Shareholders in a close corp have the same fiduciary duties toward each other as do partners in a partnership (quoting Meinard v. Salmon)
  • Remedy: Either Founder returns the money and takes back his shares or close corp must buy P’s shares at same price
156
Q

Describe the Smith v. Atlantic Properties (second case studied in close corps)

A
  • Context: 4 people each owned 25% of the shares in a close corp, and a bylaw states important decisions require a 80% vote. This makes it has to be unanimous vote. Three of fourth sued the fourth guy for refusing to vote to pay dividends out.
  • Ruling: Fourth guy determined to have breached his fiduciary duty to the other three shareholders and is liable to them for damages
  • Held: The fiduciary duties owed one another by shareholders in a close corp apply not only to majority shareholders but to anyone who exercises control over the firm (including MINORITY shareholders)
    iv. Veto power must be exercised in a manner consistent with the best interests of the corporation
    v. Lesson – this is deadlock
157
Q

What are six tools for shareholders to prevent abuse?

A
  1. Shareholder voting agreements
  2. Voting Trusts
  3. Voting Proxies
  4. Stock Transfer Restrictions
  5. Using Different Classes of Stock
  6. Sterilizing the Board
158
Q

Describe shareholder voting agreements.

A
  1. Contracts to vote shares in a specific way
  2. Because they only apply to shareholders, effective only to matters property before the shareholders (e.g.,
    election of directors, amendment of the certificate of incorporation, major organic changes (e.g., mergers))

NOTE: You cannot sell your vote aka pay me and I’ll vote this way

159
Q

Describe voting trusts.

A
  1. Require legal transfer of ownership to the trustee (unlike a voting agreement, a trust requires legal transfer).
  • Trust is the legal owner
  • Trustee owes fiduciary relationship
  • Stockholder has “equitable title” which includes all the economic benefits of ownership
  • Shareholders tell the trustee how to vote
  • Trusts specifically enforceable
  • Trustee will vote the shares as directed (not however they want)
160
Q

Describe voting proxies.

A
  • Very common in public corps
  • A contractual grant of the right to vote the voter’s shares
  • An agency relationship: I appoint you to vote my share of the election of the directors
  • Proxy is revocable
  • UNLESS it is a proxy coupled with an interest (e.g., give bank your votes in collateral for a loan. can’t revoke the proxy while the lean is outstanding)
161
Q

Describe stock transfer restrictions.

A
162
Q

Describe class sharing.

A
  1. I have more business expertise so I want control of the business but you have the money that you’re putting up so you want the larger share of the profits/dividends piece of cake do that using share classes.
  2. To create a class of stock you just put in the charter that each class A share has 10 votes and each class A share constitutes one fifth of a class B share

E.G.
a. Two people (A and B) form a corporation
i. A gets 10 shares of Class A stock
1. Each Class A share has
a. 10 votes (100 votes total)
b. 1/5 share for dividends (equal to 2 shares)
ii. B gets 10 shares of Class B stock
1. Each Class B share has
a. 1 vote (10 votes total)
b. A Full dividend (equal to 10 shares)
c. Class B shares get five times the dividends that Class A shares get – pay back for B putting in money

163
Q

What are THREE planning techniques used by Close Corporations?

A
  1. Sterilizing the Board
  2. Supermajority requirement
  3. Transfer Restrictions
    (Right of First Offer, Consent, Buy-Sell Agreements)
164
Q

What is “sterilizing the Board”?

A

A technique used by Close Corporations in which Board issues are decided by an agreement among the stockholders.

NOTE: Such corporations in effect do not have boards—the stockholders decide everything
NOTE: Some States require a formal filing to do so, other States do not.

165
Q

What is the supermajority requirement?

A

Requires more than a majority vote.

NOTE - Two key concepts
1) What is the voting base? (Is it of all outstanding shares, or outstanding plus present at meeting. Remember - it is shares votes that count not number of stockholders b/c some have more than one vote.

NOTE: In Smith case: The 80% requirement gave each shareholder a veto over any item before the shareholders OR the board

NOTE: Downside is deadlock where no one can agree given requirement of approval so high

166
Q

What are the three types of transfer restrictions?

A
  1. Right of first offer
  2. Consent
  3. Buy-sell agreements
167
Q

What is the caveat on transfer restrictions?

A

They must be noted on the certificate otherwise an innocent buyer does not know they exist and is not bound by them. Also, does not bind people who purchased before restriction put in place

168
Q

What is the rationale for transfer restrictions?

A

You want to have control over who you go into business with. In a partnership, every partner has to agree who can be a partner but this does not exist in corporation/shareholders. You don’t want your shareholder to be in the drug cartel.

169
Q

What is the Right of First Offer?

A

You must first offer the corporation the chance to buy the shares. If corp declines, can sell to another person at same price and same terms.

170
Q

What is Consent and how does the law treat them?

A

The most restrictive kind of provision.

Would-be seller cannot sell unless the holder of the right gives permission

Used to be prohibited as unreasonable restraints on alienation (of personal property)

Today, statutes usually authorize them (Model Act unless “manifestly unreasonable”)

171
Q

What are Buy-Sell Agreements?

A
  1. Contractual provision that obligates shareholder to sell back to corporation or to other shareholders
    a. Usually applies on retirement or termination
    b. AKA we open this business together; if I Die, company buys my stock from my estate for $500K and every shareholder signs an identical agreement
  2. Often used as a planning device in a close corporation
    a. In case company does not have $500K, the corporation takes out life insurance on that shareholder to finance the purchase on the shareholder’s death
    b. Provides helpful liquidity for the estate
172
Q

What are the three types of remedies available to Closed Corporations?

A
  1. Specific performance of agreements – make them honor the shareholder agreement

2.Damages – if you can prove them (very hard to prove)

3.Dissolution – courts extremely reluctant to shut down a closed corporation – unemployment, deterring business, etc.

173
Q

What are two examples where damages may be awarded?

A

Back pay for a shareholder fired wrongfully or damages suffered by a corporation as the result of a shareholder’s wrongful veto

174
Q

Where are three examples where dissolution of a Close Corporation is requested?

A
  1. When a shareholder simply wants to cash out (going to court is a threat)
  2. Requested when there is demonstrable deadlock (could also be a power play)
  3. Requested for oppression of minority shareholders (oppression is conduct that defeats the reasonable expectation of the minority shareholders)
175
Q

What are the two ways shareholders get involved in litigation?

A
  1. Direct lawsuits
  2. Derivative lawsuits
176
Q

What is a direct lawsuit?

A

A lawsuit that belongs to the shareholder to assert.

177
Q

What three characteristics describe a direct lawsuit?

A
  1. Brought by the shareholder in his or her own name
  2. Cause of action belonging to the shareholder in their individual capacity
  3. Arises from an injury directly to the shareholder
178
Q

What is a derivative lawsuit?

A

A lawsuit that belongs to the corporation to assert.

179
Q

What three characteristics describe a derivative lawsuit?

A
  1. Brought by a shareholder on corporation’s behalf
  2. Cause of action belongs to the corporation as an entity
  3. Arises out of an injury done to the corporation as an entity
180
Q

What two questions should be asked in deciding between whether a lawsuit should be direct or derivative?

A
  1. To whom did D’s duty run?
    (e.g., if corporation, suit is derivative)
  2. Who suffered the most direct injury?
    (if corporation, suit is derivative)
181
Q

If the only alleged injury is reduced stock price - is this a derivative or direct lawsuit?

A

Derivative - Every stockholder was in the same boat. Harm was done to entire corporation.

NOTE: If a shareholder’s rights are affected, harm is done to the shareholder, so claim is direct.

NOTE: If both corporation and shareholder rights impacted, claim is both derivative and direct.

182
Q

If the corporation and a vendor get into a contract and the vendor breaches the contract, may a shareholder bring a direct suit against the corporation?

A

No. This must be a derivative suit. No contract with the shareholder was breached here. Jones breach did not injure shareholder directly. Recovery would go to the corporation.

183
Q

If the corporation’s CFO embezzles all its money and absconds and the shareholders’ stock is now worthless, is this a derivative or direct lawsuit? May a shareholder of the corporation sue directly?

A

No. Not enough for a shareholder to allege that challenged conduct resulted in a drop in the corporation’s stock market price. Because your loss is derivative of corporation’s loss, only the corporation can sue.

184
Q

How did the Supreme Court refer to shareholder derivative suits?

A

“A remedy born of stockholder helplessness”

185
Q

What is indemnification?

A

Corporations have the power to indemnify defendants in a shareholder derivative suit so long as the director (a) acted in good faith, and (b) the decision was in the best interest of the corporation.

NOTE: If these elements met, the corporation must indemnify the defendant.

186
Q

What is the rule on what standing a plaintiff must have to file a derivative suit?

A

Contemporaneous ownership

187
Q

What is the rule on contemporaneous ownership?

A

To have standing, a would be plaintiff must have owned stock at the time of the wrong in order to sue.

188
Q

If the plaintiff makes a demand of the board, what rule is applied?

A

Courts will apply the business judgement rule which will almost certainly have the case thrown out.

189
Q

What if the shareholder makes the demand and the Board agrees?

A

The shareholder’s role is over, and the case proceeds as an ordinary matter under the Board’s control.
NOTE: This never happens.

190
Q

What is more likely to happen?

A

Shareholder makes the demand, then the corporation refuses to sue, and the corporation files a 12b6 motion to dismiss the case. The lawsuit will be over because the Board is given the benefit of the Business Judgement Rule.

191
Q

What must the plaintiff do if they want the court to excuse the demand requirement?

A

For every derivative suit, the plaintiff must file a complaint and must state with particularity (a) what the plaintiff did to try and get the Board to sue, OR (b) the reasons for not making the effort.

192
Q

When is there good reason for demand to be excused?

A

When a majority of the directors are interested, through application of the Zuckerberg test. The court will apply the following test to each Board member
1) Does the Board member stand to gain a personal benefit from the challenged transaction?
2) Does the Board member face a substantial likelihood of liability on the claim?
3) Does the Board member lack independence from a director described in one of the two above scenarios?
Should a majority of the members not pass the test above, demand will be excused, which is the only way for a derivative suit to succeed.

193
Q

Why is it hard for the plaintiff to make this showing?

A

Because the plaintiff must plead the facts with particularity–with specific facts to show the director failed the Zuckerberg test.
As well, the plaintiff is not afforded the benefit of discovery since the activity is taking place before a judge’s decision on the motion to dismiss.

194
Q

What sources does the plaintiff have at their disposal?

A

Media sources
Government documents
Corporate records that a stockholder is allowed to inspect
Or a mole among the board - sometimes considered the best source of information

195
Q

What happens if the plaintiff fails to plead with particularity that a majority of the directors failed the Zuckerberg test?

A

The case is dismissed for failure to make a demand
(defendant files 12b6 for failure to make a demand and the court grants the motion)

196
Q

What happens after the case is dismissed for failure to make a demand?

A

The plaintiff can make a demand to the Board however it will only succeed if the plaintiff can show demand was wrongfully excused

197
Q

What typically occurs while a court is reviewing a plaintiff’s request for a court to excuse demand?

A

The corporation puts in place a Special Litigation Committee (SLC)

198
Q

How is the SLC composed?

A

The SLC is composed of NEW directors who had no role in the challenged transaction.

199
Q

What does the SLC do?

A

They investigate the matter and decide whether the lawsuit should proceed.
NOTE: It will decide the lawsuit should not proceed.

200
Q

What does the SLC do next?

A

They file a motion to dismiss the case.

201
Q

What standard does the court apply to the SLC’s decision?

A

The Zapata standard of review.

202
Q

What is the Zapata standard of review and what are the four elements to the review and who carries the burden?

A

The burden is on the corporation to prove the SLC (a) is disinterested, (b) is independent, (c) acted in good faith, and (d) conducted a reasonable investigation.

203
Q

If the court decides the SLC does not uphold the Zapata standard, what happens?

A

The court denies the motion to dismiss and the litigation proceeds.

204
Q

What happens if the SLC decides the corporation does uphold the Zapata standard?

A

The court may review the reasonableness of the SLC’s substantive decision and this review is not afforded the leniency/protection of the Business Judgement Rule; the court reviews it using its own judgement.
NOTE: Even if the SLC did a good job, the case may STILL go forward if the judge does not agree with the substantive decision.