Biz Law Flashcards
Define partnership (traditional)
Relationship between persons carrying on a biz in common with a view to make a profit
Formation of a traditional and criteria of partnership
- no need for intention
e.g. profit sharing, all indv taking part in decision making - sufficient - The receipt by a person of a share of the profits of a business is primâ facie evidence that he is a partner in the business
advantages of traditional partnership x4 and disadvantages x1
ADV
1. low cost
2. no formalities
3. no filing / disclosure requirement -> high degree of confidentiality
4. biz can start trading immediately
DISADV:
1. unlimited liability
fiduciary duties of partners to one another x4
- duty of good faith - to act honestly towards each other and to act for the benefit of the partners as a whole
- honest and full disclosure
- unauthorised personal profit
- conflict of duty and interest
contractual liability of partners
every partner is liable jointly with other partner for debts and obligations of the firm whilst they are a partner
tortious liability of partners
joint and several
liability of new partners
will not be liable to debt incurred before they joined
liability of former partners and how to relieve + 2 types of notice
may still be liable for debts incurred whilst they were still partner
- can be relieved by novating the agreement and with creditor’s consent
- Need to notify change to 3P:
a) actual notice - for those who have had dealings with the partner before departure
b) constructive notice - publication of departure in London Gazette - for those who have not had dealings with partner before departure
No liability for debts to 3P who did not know they were partner before they left
Liability for non-partners than hold themselves out as a partner (3 elements)
may be liable IF
1. representation made to 3P
2. 3P’s action in response
3. 3P’s state of mind (believing the representation)
Determining whether a partnership is bound by a contract an indv has made on its behald depends on whether they are …. or ….? and what rules apply to each?
A. Partner
- statutory rule of agency
- common law of agency may apply
B. Non-partner
- common law only
Deciding whether a particular contract binds a firm where an agent has made it on the firm’s behalf -> where partners is CONTENT with agent’s act and the agent is either a partner/ non-partner
An indv acting as a firm’s agent (partner/ non-partner) treated as giving effect to the wishes of the partnership as whole
if all parties give express or implied authority to bind firm -> firm will be bound
Even if agent had no authority at time contract was made
Deciding whether a particular contract binds a firm where an agent has made it on the firm’s behalf -> where partners is NOT content with agent’s act and the agent is a partner
and the agent’s liability to other partners
may be binding provided that on an objective view:
1. the contract is the kind of business carried on by the firm
2. the contract is for carrying on such business in the usual way - i.e. the kind of contract that a partner alone would make on firm’s behalf OR contract an outsider would expect all partners to sign individually
BUT will not be bound if:
1. 3P knew that partner in Q was not authorised to enter into contract on behalf of the firm
2. 3P did not know/ believe that the partner was a partner
A partner who binds their firm w/o actual authority may be liable to other partners for breach of contract
Deciding whether a particular contract binds a firm where an agent has made it on the firm’s behalf -> where partners is NOT content with agent’s act and the agent is a NON-partner
an agent with no actual authority may bind firm if he has apparent authority to enter into a contract
apparent authority arises when the firm (principal) represents (holding out) or permits a representation to be made to a 3P that the non-partner has authority to bind the firm
(e.g. employing someone under title ‘marketing manager’ confers apparent authority to bind firm on marketing decisions)
What does ‘holding out’ a person to be a partner mean
making representations that a person is a partner
e.g. a firm still using old letterhead of an ex-partner’s name after they retire
Do partners within partnerships have to pay tax
Partnerships are tax transparent
each partner is liable to tax 1. as an individual on their share of the income (income tax); and
2. gains of the partnership (capital gains tax on their share of profits and gains)
Is a partnership a separate legal entity from the partners?
NO - partnership and firm refer to all partners collectively
How many people to form a partnership
minimum 2 (a company could be a partner)
How does a partner in a partnership pay capital gains tax
Capital gains tax principles apply on disposal of a capital asset
Each partner treated as owning a fractional share of the asset
The fractional share based upon
a. agreed profit sharing ratio, OR
b. if no agreed PSR - shared equally
How to override statute (Partnership Act 1980)
By partnership agreement
How to vary partner rights and obligations under an agreement or under PA 1980?
Unanimous consent
express or inferred from a course of dealing
Commencement and duration of partnership -> default statutory provisions and how to amend by partnership agreement
commence when criteria in s1(1) satisfied but useful to set out date that partners agree on
-> before commencement date, default provisions of PA1980 will apply
Duration: Can have fixed term/ continue until terminated
- If fixed term but partners continue after expiration - presumed to be partners on same term as before
Partnership property in (partner’s rights to property and what asset is partnership property?) of partnership -> default statutory provisions and how to amend by partnership agreement
each partner deemed to own share in property belonging to partnership, but does NOT have right to any particular partnership asset
whether particular asset is partnership property:
1. depends on partner’s intention at time acquired -
- all property brought into partnership on account of firm/ for purpose and in course of partnership biz = partnership property
- all property bought with money belonging to partnership = partnership asset
Can amend by partners agreeing on which assets count
partners shares in income and capital and profits and losses of partnership -> default statutory provisions and how to amend by partnership agreement
ALL partners entitled to EQUAL share in capital and profits of biz and contribute EQUALLY toward losses
- useful to amend to add a profit sharing ratio
partners drawing/ salary of partnership -> default statutory provisions and how to amend by partnership agreement
All partners entitled to share (‘draw’) income profits EQUALLY
-> can amend to set out specific amount
Without an agreement partner is not entitled to salary
-> can also amend so partners receive salary in addition to income profit share
Limits on authority of partners of partnership -> default statutory provisions and how to amend by partnership agreement
every partner MAY take part in management of the partnership business
-> can amend by setting out requirements for each partner
decision making of partnership -> default statutory provisions and how to amend by partnership agreement
decisions arise during ordinary course of the biz are decided by a majority,
except for the following > require unanimity
1. changes to nature of biz
2. introducing new partner
3. changing rights and duties of partners
-> can amend by expressly dealing with decision making and management
incoming (new) partners in partnership -> default statutory provisions and how to amend by partnership agreement
unanimous consent needed
-> can amend by e.g adding written consent
expulsion of partner out of a partnership -> default statutory provisions and how to amend by partnership agreement
cannot be expelled by majority vote unless ALL partners have previously agreed they can do so
KEY to agree to expulsion provisions in advance if not impossible to remove partner without dissolving partnership
Partner leaving a partnership -> default statutory provisions and how to amend by partnership agreement
Effect of partner leaving = dissolved partnership (automatic dissolution but a new partnership formed by remaining partners who continue (‘technical dissolution’)
BUT open to any partners to apply to court to have old partnership wound up (i.e. sale of assets for repayment of partnership debt and distribution of assets/ liabilities)
-> amendable by partnership agreement stating partnership will continue + details on how partner can leave w/o being wound up - mechanism to buy out departing partner’s share
Non-compete clauses in partnership -> default statutory provisions and how to amend by partnership agreement
If partner without consent of other partners competes with the firm, they must account to firm for all profits made by them in that biz
Should add express clause preventing current partners from competing with firm
Restrictions on outgoing partners > default statutory provisions and how to amend by partnership agreement
No default clauses to limit powers of outgoing partners to compete with partnership after leaving
Amendable in partnership agreement
1. add non-compete clause (prevent former partners competing with biz)
2. add non-solicit clauses (prevent former partners from soliciting biz from partnership’s clients)
3. non-dealing clauses (prevent former partners from entering into contract with clients/ former clients/ employees of partnership)
–> Only reasonable duration and scope for protection of a legitimate biz interest
7 ways to dissolve (terminate) a partnership
- automatic dissolution (subject to contrary agreement)
- expiry of fixed term
- completion of specific venture
- death/ bankruptcy of any partner
- by notice from any partner
- if partnership biz becomes unlawful
- by court as last resort
Collecting in and distributing assets on the dissolution of a partnership -> default provisions + amended partnership agreement
when partnership wound up, once all debts and liabilities paid, any money/ assets left will be distributed so each partner paid their original capital first
If any surplus asset -> shared equally
a. or if partnership agreement has specific asset surplus ratio
Is LLP a separate legal entity from its members
YES
Formation of LLP 3 steps
- registration at Companies House (LLIN01) - name, registered office’s address, designated members
- certificate of incorporation - given company no
- obliged to continue filing new information with Companies House
- change of name/ office/ membership
- creation of charge
- annual confirmation statement and accounts
and maintain in-house records (registers of members and people with significant control (PSCs) with >25% interest or sig control)
Requirements for members of LLP - how many?
at least 2 persons, not just indv
no limit on maximum
at least 2 members must be designated members e.g. those that make filings at companies house
when does a member cease to be a member of LLP (x4)
- death (indv)/ dissolution (company)
- agreement with other members
- giving notice
What governs LLP’s procedures and arrangements agreed by members? (statute x11 + ??)
11 Statutory default provisions (2001 Regulations)
- share capital and profits EQUALLY
- LLP must indemnity its members for payments/ personal liabilities incurred in ordinary and proper conduct of biz
- every member may take part in management
- no member entitled to remuneration
- no person can become member/ assign their memberships without unanimous consent
- ordinary decisions by majority, changes to nature of biz by unanimity
- members must give true accounts and full info of things affecting LLP
- books and records must be available for inspection by members at registered office
- if member (w/o consent) carries on biz of same nature and competes with LLP, must account for and pay LLP all profits made in that biz
- members have duty to account for benefits derived from transactions with LLP and its biz or property
- no implied power of expulsion of member by majority unless expressly provided in members’ agreement
Or creating the LLP Agreement (but not obliged to do so)
No memorandum/ articles of association
Taxation of LLP
Tax transparent (the LLP is not taxed, but the partners are)
1. members not LLP pay income tax and capital gains tax
2. LLPA gives relief from stamp duty
3. LLP may register for VAT, not members
advantages of LLP x4 Disadvantage of LLP x3
ADV
1. limited liability for its members
- company is a separate legal entity – it can enter into contracts and own property, sue and be sued.
- Tax transparent - the LLP is not taxed, but the partners are
- credibility - due to disclosure and regulatory requirements, creditors and lenders sometimes have more confidence dealing with a company
DISADV
1. have to file accounts at Companies House on much the same basis as companies, leading to a loss of financial privacy + cost + time
- Ongoing formalities
- subject to the ‘clawback’ rule - in certain circumstances money taken out of the LLP by members up to two years before winding up of the LLP can be clawed back into the pool of assets available to repay LLP’s creditors
A company’s constitutional documents under CA 2006
Articles of Association
Not memorandum anymore (previous CA1985 req)
A company’s constitutional documents under CA 1985
Articles of Association AND memorandum to include objects clause setting out purpose company formed
Purpose of Articles
regulate relationships between shareholders, directors and company -> i.e. company’s rules
Relationship between CA 2006 and the Articles
Legality Test: The Articles must comply with the minimum provisions of CA 2006
A company may provide a more onerous procedure in its Articles than contained in CA 2006
(e.g. CA2006 requires min 1 director, can amend in Articles to require 3)
BUT, there are some CA2006 provisions which override anything in company’s Articles
(right to demand poll vote at GM cannot be removed or varied)
Unamendable CA 2006 provision
The right to demand poll vote at GM cannot be removed/ varied by Articles
How to amend Articles and entrenched provisions
By special resolution and file at Companies House
Basic rule: any amendment must be made bona fide in the interests of the company as a whole
Entrenched provisions (those can only be amended/ repealed if specific conditions met) can be amended by unanimous agreement of all members or by court order
Legal effect of Articles
BINDING on both company and its members
contract…
a. between members themselves and
- members only able to enforce provisions contained in Articles through the company itself and not enforce rights against other members
b. also between company and its members
- courts can prevent company from infringing members rights by granting injunction
- member obliged to comply with articles as far as they are relevant to his capacity as a member
- e.g. right to vote or right to receive final dividend once approved by resolution
2 ways to form a company
- incorporate new company from scratch
- purchase and convert existing shelf company
What to deliver to Companies House to incorporate new company from scratch x4
- memorandum
- Articles (if not using MA)
- fee
- Form IN01
What does certificate of incorporations set out and its effect
- Name of company - can be changed later
- registered no. -> never change
- date of incorporation
Company becomes legal entity from date certificate of incorporation is issued by Companies House
Until certificate issued, it is not a legal person and has no capacity to enter into contracts AT ALL.
How to change a company’s name - 3 steps
- special resolution by shareholders (unless provided by Articles)
- Form NM01 filed at Companies House
- effective once Registrar of Companies issue new certificate of incorporation
Changing members, directors and company secretary of a shelf company - 4 steps
- shares held by first members (subscribers) transferred using stock transfer form - usually board meeting to approve transfer
- the client becomes the shareholder once entered on the register of members
- the client’s representatives appointed as director and secretary forms filed at Companies House
4, the first director and secretary resign and forms filed at Companies House
Note: appoint first then resign -> company will always need at least one director to be compliant
Appointing new directors - what resolution?
Board resolution by directors OR ordinary resolution by shareholders
Appointment of secretary - what resolution?
By directors - usually board resolution (no specific req, private company not required to have secretary)
Resignation of existing directors - - what resolution?
- send letter of resignation
- effective from date set out in letter
- no board/ shareholder resolutions needed
Appointment of new Chairperson - resolution needed ?
Outgoing director who was chairman ceases to be chairman automatically upon his resignation
Board resolution
Change of registered office - what resolution?
Board gives notice to register
Board resolution to instruct secretary to fill in form