Biostats Flashcards
How to interpret AUC
Larger AUC= better diagnostic accuracy
What does AUC of 1.0 mea?
100% sensitivity and specificity
What does odds ratio of >1 vs <1 mean?
OR > 1 means exposure is associated with higher odds of an outcome
How to interpret CI of odds ratios
If it runs over 1.0, its not significant
What is non-response bias and how does it affect study results?
In questionaires, people who don’t respond may be very different from those that do respond. (i.e. people with more severe disease may not be able to respond to the questionaire, thus skewing your results)
How does stratifying help determine if a variable is confounding your results?
If there appears to be a significant difference between 2 groups, if you stratify the groups by one of their common a different variable and there is no signiicant difference, then the variable that you stratified is the confounding variable
“stroke is higher in obese than non obese, but when participants are separated into diabetes vs no diabetes, there isn’t a significant difference in rates of stroke in obese/non obese people”
Define Study power
The ability for a study to detect a true difference between two groups
2 ways to increase the power of a study
Increase the sample size
Increase the precision of measurement (more likely to detect a true difference)
What is the benefit of using Liklihood Ratios?
They are completely independent of a diseases prevalence
Susceptibility bias
The test and control groups have different prognosis based on some unforseen variable (i.e. confounding variables)
What is verification bias and when does it happen?
Happens in studies that use the gold standard treatment method as the control, and test against a new method. SO, to reduce this, you have to use the gold standard method on a small random group of people from the new group to VERIFY that the new method is better/worse than gold standard
Factorial study design
Study with >2 interventions and all the combinations of those interventions
Vit D alone
Calcium alone
Vit + calcium
Neither Vit or Cal
Crossover study
Participants are exposed to different treatments as the study progresses…essentially, they CROSSover to a different study arm mid way through to assess how the other intervention works for them
What is a pragmatic study
A study that aims to determine if an intervention works under real world conditions
i.e. NOT a randomized controlled trial, because in real life, people aren’t randomized and nothing is controlled
What is net clinical benefit, and how do you measure it?
Basically, weighing the risks and benefits of an intervention and determine if there is net benefit
NCB = (greatest possible benefit - greatest possible risk)
What is intention to treat analysis
Every participant is analyzed based on the group they were randomized to…regardless of whether they actually adhered to the treatment plan
What are the 3 pillars of designing a randomized controlled trial
Randomization
Blinding
Intention to treat analysis
How does power of a study affect confidence intervals?
The higher the power, the narrower the confidence interval
So, if a study as a really wide CI, it tells you the power of the study is poor (beause power means the study’s ability to detect a difference between 2 groups. If you have a wide CI, your ability to identify the difference isn’t very good since you have a huge range)